From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD629A0487 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:39:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921411BDF9; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:39:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2651E1BDE7 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:39:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A458921540; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 05:39:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Jul 2019 05:39:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=08awdVBM1Xt5sX0C+siOEcegLFJPGoeXyKN0Pl/QW3I=; b=B2eCwAifT+Yr kFkvzFt4czcZ/n9xiJYN4GyBDf+QG6y3mIGPHpXRGs0Jn01Xh9NgZXH0/7H90IvJ Rq79jOudKvth0Wtbihm8YpdZhDR9TQ85nHQP2XVFstSgTf7Q17ziuyp0G8d1Vbn7 0SGSxqfouQBMQVAZ6Kw3n8dbrgu4pts= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=08awdVBM1Xt5sX0C+siOEcegLFJPGoeXyKN0Pl/QW 3I=; b=U45y8SPjPsONli+EWmgePigKmpdLY5F4QTfUVGeae3bBlchNMSuVBvmER b9kwUt6RwZgXCPeX0GEkufe6WTJJGHQf5VDwyDJ8ijyo377kraQt/t/jeH3aYNRK 3KvZqENVxj48mTN58QaRGe2PudiMTLKAD9ki8WuZd7CX3jmLq/RTwFmBLB7K3Xte dSkSG6rZ4zzYiMlXgSgJPqNY/HuK2kBSRi6V33JMEJGPVQ1S6dqTi2gKbm8hyZOP o4Z0a/1A2UV8l0DJHt3/dQj7gBmEM/c2n21fKlZ1xN26S+ERZ71USrFp/hjq1mNl Ycel1u9fgRylWB1bExd9CUgM4ZLSw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrfeeggddukecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepsghuihhlthdrshhopdhthhgvrdhsohenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdef rddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghloh hnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepud X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AE78D380074; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 05:39:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, Neil Horman Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:39:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1605498.ZGlQ3oZTaz@xps> In-Reply-To: <2033098.zfnWnl858g@xps> References: <20190705093401.69913-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20190705093540.GA452@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <2033098.zfnWnl858g@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] standardize rawdev names X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 05/07/2019 11:38, Thomas Monjalon: > 05/07/2019 11:35, Bruce Richardson: > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:33:59AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > The names of the rawdev drivers and the resultant libraries they built > > > were pretty inconsistent. In terms of directory names, some had "rawdev" > > > in the name, e.g. skeleton_rawdev, ifpga_rawdev, while others didn't. > > > Also, for the built .so/.a libraries, the names were not always > > > consistent between make and meson, as, while meson enforced a consistent > > > naming scheme, make did not, leading to differences - especially for > > > those drivers with "rawdev" in the directory name. > > > > > > This patchset attempts to make things more standardized by removing > > > "rawdev" from all directory names - the drivers are in the "drivers/raw" > > > directory after all - and then standardizing the library names to > > > "librte_rawdev_" for both make and meson. > > > > > > Bruce Richardson (2): drivers/raw: remove rawdev from driver directory > > > names drivers/raw: standardize name format of rawdev drivers > > > > > Since the .so/.a files we produce are changing, would this patchset - if > > accepted - need a deprecation notice in 19.08 for a future 19.11 merge? > > I would say we can merge it in 19.08 without prior notice. > Any other opinion? Cc Neil