From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, yliu@fridaylinux.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
jianfeng.tan@intel.com
Cc: lprosek@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] vhost: destroy unused virtqueues when multiqueue not negotiated
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:40:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16059002-07f5-26b0-41eb-0808e63882bb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205083434.14292-5-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Hi Maxime,
On 12/05/17 09:34, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> QEMU sends VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_CALL requests for all queues
> declared in QEMU command line before the guest is started.
> It has the effect in DPDK vhost-user backend to allocate vrings
> for all queues declared by QEMU.
>
> If the first driver being used does not support multiqueue,
> the device never changes to VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING state as only
> the first queue pair is initialized. One driver impacted by
> this bug is virtio-net's iPXE driver which does not support
> VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ feature.
>
> It is safe to destroy unused virtqueues in SET_FEATURES request
> handler, as it is ensured the device is not in running state
> at this stage, so virtqueues aren't being processed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> index a5e1f2482..b17080215 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ vhost_user_get_features(struct virtio_net *dev)
> static int
> vhost_user_set_features(struct virtio_net *dev, uint64_t features)
> {
> + int i;
> uint64_t vhost_features = 0;
>
> rte_vhost_driver_get_features(dev->ifname, &vhost_features);
> @@ -216,6 +217,24 @@ vhost_user_set_features(struct virtio_net *dev, uint64_t features)
> (dev->features & (1 << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) ? "on" : "off",
> (dev->features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) ? "on" : "off");
>
> + if (!(dev->features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ))) {
> + /*
> + * Remove all but first queue pair if MQ hasn't been
> + * negotiated. This is safe because the device is not
> + * running at this stage.
> + */
> + for (i = dev->nr_vring; i > 1; i--) {
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = dev->virtqueue[i];
Sorry, I don't have any experience with dpdk.
But, if "dev->virtqueue" has "dev->nr_vring" elements, then this loop is
off-by one; dev->virtqueue[dev->nr_vring] should never be accessed. For
example, if you have three queues, numbered 0, 1 and 2, this loop will
access/release virtqueue[3] (bad) and virtqueue[2] (good).
Instead, I suggest:
i = dev->nr_vring;
while (i > 2) {
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
vq = dev->virtqueue[--i];
/* the rest here */
}
The loop body is entered with "i" standing for "how many queues are left
that should be freed".
Thanks
Laszlo
> +
> + if (!vq)
> + continue;
> +
> + cleanup_vq(vq, 1);
> + free_vq(vq);
> + dev->nr_vring--;
> + }
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 8:34 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Vhost: fix mq=on but VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ " Maxime Coquelin
2017-12-05 8:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] vhost: prevent features to be changed while device is running Maxime Coquelin
2017-12-05 8:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] vhost: propagate VHOST_USER_SET_FEATURES handling error Maxime Coquelin
2017-12-05 8:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] vhost: extract virtqueue cleaning and freeing functions Maxime Coquelin
2017-12-05 8:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] vhost: destroy unused virtqueues when multiqueue not negotiated Maxime Coquelin
2017-12-05 14:40 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-12-05 14:56 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16059002-07f5-26b0-41eb-0808e63882bb@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
--cc=lprosek@redhat.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).