Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 00/13] Update build system

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

Hi Sergio,

2015-01-12 16:33, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> This patch series updates the DPDK build system.

Thanks for proposing such rework.
We need discussions on that topic. So I ask some questions below.

> Following are the goals it tries to accomplish:
>  - Create a library containing core DPDK libraries (librte_eal,
>    librte_malloc, librte_mempool, librte_mbuf and librte_ring).
>    The idea of core libraries is to group those libraries that are
>    always required for any DPDK application.

How is it better? Is it only to reduce dependencies lines?

>  - Remove config option to build a combined library.

Why removing combined library? Is there people finding it helpful?

>  - For shared libraries, explicitly link against dependant
>    libraries (adding entries to DT_NEEDED).

OK, good.

>  - Update app linking flags against static/shared DPDK libs.
> 
> Note that this patch turns up being quite big because of moving lib
> directories to a new subdirectory.
> I have ommited the actual diff from the patch doing the move of librte_eal
> as it is quite big (6MB). Probably a different approach is preferred.

Why do you think moving directories is needed?

Thanks
-- 
Thomas