From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
To: orika@nvidia.com, thomas@monjalon.net, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, matan@nvidia.com,
viacheslavo@nvidia.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, getelson@nvidia.com,
andreyv@nvidia.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] doc: update user guide for indirect action
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:03:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1618063428-206842-4-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1618063428-206842-1-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com>
The testpmd application user guide is updated. All the "shared
action" related parts are replaced with "indirect action" to have a
correct explanation.
Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
---
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 94 ++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index 2b407a3..42d3d23 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -4049,10 +4049,10 @@ This section lists supported actions and their attributes, if any.
- ``dscp_value {unsigned}``: The new DSCP value to be set
-- ``shared``: Use shared action created via
- ``flow shared_action {port_id} create``
+- ``indirect``: Use indirect action created via
+ ``flow indirect_action {port_id} create``
- - ``shared_action_id {unsigned}``: Shared action ID to use
+ - ``indirect_action_id {unsigned}``: Indirect action ID to use
Destroying flow rules
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -4343,113 +4343,113 @@ If attach ``destroy`` parameter, the command will destroy all the list aged flow
testpmd> flow aged 0
Port 0 total aged flows: 0
-Creating shared actions
+Creating indirect actions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-``flow shared_action {port_id} create`` creates shared action with optional
-shared action ID. It is bound to ``rte_flow_shared_action_create()``::
+``flow indirect_action {port_id} create`` creates indirect action with optional
+indirect action ID. It is bound to ``rte_flow_action_handle_create()``::
- flow shared_action {port_id} create [action_id {shared_action_id}]
+ flow indirect_action {port_id} create [action_id {indirect_action_id}]
[ingress] [egress] [transfer] action {action} / end
If successful, it will show::
- Shared action #[...] created
+ Indirect action #[...] created
-Otherwise, it will complain either that shared action already exists or that
+Otherwise, it will complain either that indirect action already exists or that
some error occurred::
- Shared action #[...] is already assigned, delete it first
+ Indirect action #[...] is already assigned, delete it first
::
Caught error type [...] ([...]): [...]
-Create shared rss action with id 100 to queues 1 and 2 on port 0::
+Create indirect rss action with id 100 to queues 1 and 2 on port 0::
- testpmd> flow shared_action 0 create action_id 100 \
+ testpmd> flow indirect_action 0 create action_id 100 \
ingress action rss queues 1 2 end / end
-Create shared rss action with id assigned by testpmd to queues 1 and 2 on
+Create indirect rss action with id assigned by testpmd to queues 1 and 2 on
port 0::
- testpmd> flow shared_action 0 create action_id \
+ testpmd> flow indirect_action 0 create action_id \
ingress action rss queues 0 1 end / end
-Updating shared actions
+Updating indirect actions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-``flow shared_action {port_id} update`` updates configuration of the shared
-action from its shared action ID (as returned by
-``flow shared_action {port_id} create``). It is bound to
-``rte_flow_shared_action_update()``::
+``flow indirect_action {port_id} update`` updates configuration of the indirect
+action from its indirect action ID (as returned by
+``flow indirect_action {port_id} create``). It is bound to
+``rte_flow_action_handle_update()``::
- flow shared_action {port_id} update {shared_action_id}
+ flow indirect_action {port_id} update {indirect_action_id}
action {action} / end
If successful, it will show::
- Shared action #[...] updated
+ Indirect action #[...] updated
-Otherwise, it will complain either that shared action not found or that some
+Otherwise, it will complain either that indirect action not found or that some
error occurred::
- Failed to find shared action #[...] on port [...]
+ Failed to find indirect action #[...] on port [...]
::
Caught error type [...] ([...]): [...]
-Update shared rss action having id 100 on port 0 with rss to queues 0 and 3
+Update indirect rss action having id 100 on port 0 with rss to queues 0 and 3
(in create example above rss queues were 1 and 2)::
- testpmd> flow shared_action 0 update 100 action rss queues 0 3 end / end
+ testpmd> flow indirect_action 0 update 100 action rss queues 0 3 end / end
-Destroying shared actions
+Destroying indirect actions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-``flow shared_action {port_id} update`` destroys one or more shared actions
-from their shared action IDs (as returned by
-``flow shared_action {port_id} create``). It is bound to
-``rte_flow_shared_action_destroy()``::
+``flow indirect_action {port_id} destroy`` destroys one or more indirect actions
+from their indirect action IDs (as returned by
+``flow indirect_action {port_id} create``). It is bound to
+``rte_flow_action_handle_destroy()``::
- flow shared_action {port_id} destroy action_id {shared_action_id} [...]
+ flow indirect_action {port_id} destroy action_id {indirect_action_id} [...]
If successful, it will show::
- Shared action #[...] destroyed
+ Indirect action #[...] destroyed
-It does not report anything for shared action IDs that do not exist.
-The usual error message is shown when a shared action cannot be destroyed::
+It does not report anything for indirect action IDs that do not exist.
+The usual error message is shown when a indirect action cannot be destroyed::
Caught error type [...] ([...]): [...]
-Destroy shared actions having id 100 & 101::
+Destroy indirect actions having id 100 & 101::
- testpmd> flow shared_action 0 destroy action_id 100 action_id 101
+ testpmd> flow indirect_action 0 destroy action_id 100 action_id 101
-Query shared actions
+Query indirect actions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-``flow shared_action {port_id} query`` queries the shared action from its
-shared action ID (as returned by ``flow shared_action {port_id} create``).
-It is bound to ``rte_flow_shared_action_query()``::
+``flow indirect_action {port_id} query`` queries the indirect action from its
+indirect action ID (as returned by ``flow indirect_action {port_id} create``).
+It is bound to ``rte_flow_action_handle_query()``::
- flow shared_action {port_id} query {shared_action_id}
+ flow indirect_action {port_id} query {indirect_action_id}
-Currently only rss shared action supported. If successful, it will show::
+Currently only rss indirect action supported. If successful, it will show::
- Shared RSS action:
+ Indirect RSS action:
refs:[...]
-Otherwise, it will complain either that shared action not found or that some
+Otherwise, it will complain either that indirect action not found or that some
error occurred::
- Failed to find shared action #[...] on port [...]
+ Failed to find indirect action #[...] on port [...]
::
Caught error type [...] ([...]): [...]
-Query shared action having id 100::
+Query indirect action having id 100::
- testpmd> flow shared_action 0 query 100
+ testpmd> flow indirect_action 0 query 100
Sample QinQ flow rules
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-10 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1615967952-228321-1-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com>
2021-03-17 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce action context APIs Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-17 16:10 ` Bing Zhao
2021-03-22 14:59 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-06 9:05 ` Bing Zhao
2021-03-22 14:54 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-06 9:07 ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-06 9:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-06 11:02 ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-06 12:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-07 3:16 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-07 6:11 ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-08 14:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-09 3:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-10 14:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Change shared action API to action handle API Bing Zhao
2021-04-10 14:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-12 19:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-13 1:26 ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-13 14:00 ` Ori Kam
2021-04-13 12:36 ` Andrey Vesnovaty
2021-04-15 13:55 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-15 14:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-15 16:02 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-10 14:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] app/test-pmd: change to indirect action command Bing Zhao
2021-04-10 14:03 ` Bing Zhao [this message]
2021-04-10 14:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: adaption to indirect action API Bing Zhao
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Change shared action API to action handle API Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-13 1:22 ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-13 7:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-13 7:24 ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 15:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/1] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 15:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 15:56 ` Ori Kam
2021-04-15 17:59 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-16 6:58 ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 7:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16 15:00 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-16 17:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/1] Change shared action API to action handle API Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 12:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 15:05 ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] Change shared action API to action handle API Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/1] Change shared action API to action handle API Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/1] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 15:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1618063428-206842-4-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com \
--to=bingz@nvidia.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=andreyv@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=getelson@nvidia.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).