From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31441A0524; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:50:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09362160EB7; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:50:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1ED160E94 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:50:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FKP3z2jMYz9ydV for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:47:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.69.192.56) by DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:49:55 +0800 From: "Min Hu (Connor)" To: CC: Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:50:01 +0800 Message-ID: <1618314611-47978-3-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1618314611-47978-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> References: <1618314611-47978-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.69.192.56] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/12] net/hns3: fix possible mismatches response of mailbox X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" From: Chengwen Feng Currently, the mailbox synchronous communication between VF and PF use the following fields to maintain communication: 1. Req_msg_data which was combined by message code and subcode, used to match request and response. 2. Head which means the number of requests successfully sent by VF. 3. Tail which means the number of responses successfully received by VF. 4. Lost which means the number of requests which are timeout. There may possible mismatches of the following situation: 1. VF sends message A with code=1 subcode=1. Then head=1, tail=0, lost=0. 2. PF was blocked about 500ms when processing the message A. 3. VF will detect message A timeout because it can't get the response within 500ms. Then head=1, tail=0, lost=1. 4. VF sends message B with code=1 subcode=1 which equal message A. Then head=2, tail=0, lost=1. 5. PF processes the first message A and send the response message to VF. 6. VF will update tail field to 1, but the lost field will remain unchanged because the code/subcode equal message B's, so driver will return success because now the head(2) equals tail(1) plus lost(1). This will lead to mismatch of request and response. To fix the above bug, we use the following scheme: 1. The message sent from VF was labelled with match_id which was a unique 16-bit non-zero value. 2. The response sent from PF will label with match_id which got from the request. 3. The VF uses the match_id to match request and response message. This scheme depends on the PF driver, if the PF driver don't support then VF will uses the original scheme. Fixes: 463e748964f5 ("net/hns3: support mailbox") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) --- drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h | 20 +++++++- 2 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c index 4326c7b..8e38649 100644 --- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c +++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c @@ -40,14 +40,32 @@ hns3_resp_to_errno(uint16_t resp_code) return -EIO; } +static void +hns3_mbx_proc_timeout(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode) +{ + if (hw->mbx_resp.matching_scheme == + HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_ORIGINAL) { + hw->mbx_resp.lost++; + hns3_err(hw, + "VF could not get mbx(%u,%u) head(%u) tail(%u) " + "lost(%u) from PF", + code, subcode, hw->mbx_resp.head, hw->mbx_resp.tail, + hw->mbx_resp.lost); + return; + } + + hns3_err(hw, "VF could not get mbx(%u,%u) from PF", code, subcode); +} + static int -hns3_get_mbx_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code0, uint16_t code1, +hns3_get_mbx_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode, uint8_t *resp_data, uint16_t resp_len) { #define HNS3_MAX_RETRY_MS 500 #define HNS3_WAIT_RESP_US 100 struct hns3_adapter *hns = HNS3_DEV_HW_TO_ADAPTER(hw); struct hns3_mbx_resp_status *mbx_resp; + bool received; uint64_t now; uint64_t end; @@ -59,8 +77,7 @@ hns3_get_mbx_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code0, uint16_t code1, now = get_timeofday_ms(); end = now + HNS3_MAX_RETRY_MS; - while ((hw->mbx_resp.head != hw->mbx_resp.tail + hw->mbx_resp.lost) && - (now < end)) { + while (now < end) { if (__atomic_load_n(&hw->reset.disable_cmd, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) { hns3_err(hw, "Don't wait for mbx respone because of " "disable_cmd"); @@ -77,16 +94,20 @@ hns3_get_mbx_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code0, uint16_t code1, hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw); rte_delay_us(HNS3_WAIT_RESP_US); + if (hw->mbx_resp.matching_scheme == + HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_ORIGINAL) + received = (hw->mbx_resp.head == + hw->mbx_resp.tail + hw->mbx_resp.lost); + else + received = hw->mbx_resp.received_match_resp; + if (received) + break; + now = get_timeofday_ms(); } hw->mbx_resp.req_msg_data = 0; if (now >= end) { - hw->mbx_resp.lost++; - hns3_err(hw, - "VF could not get mbx(%u,%u) head(%u) tail(%u) " - "lost(%u) from PF", - code0, code1, hw->mbx_resp.head, hw->mbx_resp.tail, - hw->mbx_resp.lost); + hns3_mbx_proc_timeout(hw, code, subcode); return -ETIME; } rte_io_rmb(); @@ -101,6 +122,29 @@ hns3_get_mbx_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code0, uint16_t code1, return 0; } +static void +hns3_mbx_prepare_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode) +{ + /* + * Init both matching scheme fields because we may not know the exact + * scheme will be used when in the initial phase. + * + * Also, there are OK to init both matching scheme fields even though + * we get the exact scheme which is used. + */ + hw->mbx_resp.req_msg_data = (uint32_t)code << 16 | subcode; + hw->mbx_resp.head++; + + /* Update match_id and ensure the value of match_id is not zero */ + hw->mbx_resp.match_id++; + if (hw->mbx_resp.match_id == 0) + hw->mbx_resp.match_id = 1; + hw->mbx_resp.received_match_resp = false; + + hw->mbx_resp.resp_status = 0; + memset(hw->mbx_resp.additional_info, 0, HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE); +} + int hns3_send_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode, const uint8_t *msg_data, uint8_t msg_len, bool need_resp, @@ -138,8 +182,8 @@ hns3_send_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode, if (need_resp) { req->mbx_need_resp |= HNS3_MBX_NEED_RESP_BIT; rte_spinlock_lock(&hw->mbx_resp.lock); - hw->mbx_resp.req_msg_data = (uint32_t)code << 16 | subcode; - hw->mbx_resp.head++; + hns3_mbx_prepare_resp(hw, code, subcode); + req->match_id = hw->mbx_resp.match_id; ret = hns3_cmd_send(hw, &desc, 1); if (ret) { hw->mbx_resp.head--; @@ -244,6 +288,46 @@ hns3_update_resp_position(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint32_t resp_msg) } static void +hns3_handle_mbx_response(struct hns3_hw *hw, struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req) +{ + struct hns3_mbx_resp_status *resp = &hw->mbx_resp; + uint32_t msg_data; + + if (req->match_id != 0) { + /* + * If match_id is not zero, it means PF support copy request's + * match_id to its response. So VF could use the match_id + * to match the request. + */ + if (resp->matching_scheme != + HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_MATCH_ID) { + resp->matching_scheme = + HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_MATCH_ID; + hns3_info(hw, "detect mailbox support match id!"); + } + if (req->match_id == resp->match_id) { + resp->resp_status = hns3_resp_to_errno(req->msg[3]); + memcpy(resp->additional_info, &req->msg[4], + HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE); + rte_io_wmb(); + resp->received_match_resp = true; + } + return; + } + + /* + * If the below instructions can be executed, it means PF does not + * support copy request's match_id to its response. So VF follows the + * original scheme to process. + */ + resp->resp_status = hns3_resp_to_errno(req->msg[3]); + memcpy(resp->additional_info, &req->msg[4], + HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE); + msg_data = (uint32_t)req->msg[1] << 16 | req->msg[2]; + hns3_update_resp_position(hw, msg_data); +} + +static void hns3_link_fail_parse(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint8_t link_fail_code) { switch (link_fail_code) { @@ -319,15 +403,11 @@ hns3_handle_promisc_info(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t promisc_en) void hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw) { - struct hns3_mbx_resp_status *resp = &hw->mbx_resp; struct hns3_cmq_ring *crq = &hw->cmq.crq; struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req; struct hns3_cmd_desc *desc; - uint32_t msg_data; uint8_t opcode; uint16_t flag; - uint8_t *temp; - int i; rte_spinlock_lock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock); @@ -355,15 +435,7 @@ hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw) switch (opcode) { case HNS3_MBX_PF_VF_RESP: - resp->resp_status = hns3_resp_to_errno(req->msg[3]); - - temp = (uint8_t *)&req->msg[4]; - for (i = 0; i < HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE; i++) { - resp->additional_info[i] = *temp; - temp++; - } - msg_data = (uint32_t)req->msg[1] << 16 | req->msg[2]; - hns3_update_resp_position(hw, msg_data); + hns3_handle_mbx_response(hw, req); break; case HNS3_MBX_LINK_STAT_CHANGE: hns3vf_handle_link_change_event(hw, req); diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h index 45aa4cd..0e9194d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h +++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h @@ -83,12 +83,26 @@ enum hns3_mbx_link_fail_subcode { #define HNS3_MBX_RING_MAP_BASIC_MSG_NUM 3 #define HNS3_MBX_RING_NODE_VARIABLE_NUM 3 +enum { + HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_ORIGINAL = 0, + HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_MATCH_ID +}; + struct hns3_mbx_resp_status { rte_spinlock_t lock; /* protects against contending sync cmd resp */ + + uint8_t matching_scheme; + + /* The following fields used in the matching scheme for original */ uint32_t req_msg_data; uint32_t head; uint32_t tail; uint32_t lost; + + /* The following fields used in the matching scheme for match_id */ + uint16_t match_id; + bool received_match_resp; + int resp_status; uint8_t additional_info[HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE]; }; @@ -106,7 +120,8 @@ struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd { uint8_t mbx_need_resp; uint8_t rsv1; uint8_t msg_len; - uint8_t rsv2[3]; + uint8_t rsv2; + uint16_t match_id; uint8_t msg[HNS3_MBX_MAX_MSG_SIZE]; }; @@ -114,7 +129,8 @@ struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd { uint8_t dest_vfid; uint8_t rsv[3]; uint8_t msg_len; - uint8_t rsv1[3]; + uint8_t rsv1; + uint16_t match_id; uint16_t msg[8]; }; -- 2.7.4