[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/timer: fix memzone reserve failure check

["Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>]

Segmentation fault may occur without checking if memzone
reserves succeed or not.

This patch fixed it.

Fixes: 50247fe03fe0 ("test/timer: exercise new APIs in secondary process")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
---
v2:
* use TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL check "mz" instead of checking
  the test_info pointer.
---
 app/test/test_timer_secondary.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_timer_secondary.c b/app/test/test_timer_secondary.c
index 1e8f1d4..16a9f18 100644
--- a/app/test/test_timer_secondary.c
+++ b/app/test/test_timer_secondary.c
@@ -125,9 +125,9 @@ test_timer_secondary(void)
 
 		mz = rte_memzone_reserve(TEST_INFO_MZ_NAME, sizeof(*test_info),
 					 SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
-		test_info = mz->addr;
-		TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test_info, "Couldn't allocate memory for "
+		TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(mz, "Couldn't allocate memory for "
 				     "test data");
+		test_info = mz->addr;
 
 		test_info->tim_mempool = rte_mempool_create("test_timer_mp",
 				NUM_TIMERS, sizeof(struct rte_timer), 0, 0,
@@ -171,9 +171,9 @@ test_timer_secondary(void)
 		int i;
 
 		mz = rte_memzone_lookup(TEST_INFO_MZ_NAME);
-		test_info = mz->addr;
-		TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test_info, "Couldn't lookup memzone for "
+		TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(mz, "Couldn't lookup memzone for "
 				     "test info");
+		test_info = mz->addr;
 
 		for (i = 0; i < NUM_TIMERS; i++) {
 			rte_mempool_get(test_info->tim_mempool, (void **)&tim);
-- 
2.7.4