From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460FD1FE for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:20:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id f8so5574468wiw.0 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:24:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=y+ixmKvvlrov/hybKSr2vVqPrlKmWVFZnU0b8OHJ1Zk=; b=KJep4J/0tpoSYdFkyhfZJ07HBKD4bmMK8MExIthUv/XzjCqlvAwUrfr1FykIFHgzFj CSEdXxnS6FYK1IawTNm2hM2PUvzNk3y+xyh8moaWcZu2wyHR5d44ztou69U6Y/HvTYRz 6fwF6Sgcx0r7vISkVYoqYH15UkYaMlhM0fa+VHzsSHnkQGobGXksa4ZupR5YJQphNo2E znk+paD+EURqd+1byHMFt166xPShV2+BONbBWGHisUfbfp5bACZvI8CLTwcD13WnzLdl NRqUOvwGDV72d3lUdKG3MlEtrt2KQHxO1p+hk68HQIKqY425K5gnGE2mhCtBVPBPxNIE a6pQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkjofleWie1hCik9DXVTcdxIO1Cibs1kT22UYCP2IdltfpVsxxsQxtwaOLN3d9S9g3D0U0o X-Received: by 10.180.92.73 with SMTP id ck9mr27899158wib.54.1409135048808; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fo19sm1488724wic.1.2014.08.27.03.24.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:24:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Xie, Huawei" Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:24:03 +0200 Message-ID: <1629725.WnvXPRWkGi@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.15.8-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1409062300-17004-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 0/3] only call iopl when necessary X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:20:06 -0000 Hi Huawei, 2014-08-27 10:09, Xie, Huawei: > ok, as long as we ensure with virtio PMD, the parent DPDK process has the > iopl permission so that all child threads inherits the permission. If you think the patch serie is ok, a "Reviewed-by" would be appreciated. Also, please could you check your email settings to have cite marks (">") in text version of your email? Reminder 1: only text emails are forwared to the list Reminder 2: we should answer below the question (no top posting) Thanks -- Thomas > From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:05 PM > To: Xie, Huawei > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 0/3] only call iopl when necessary > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Xie, Huawei > wrote: > That is ok. If virtio PMD is a dynamic linked library, is it possible that virtio PMD is loaded later? > > The shared library are loaded through -d option, which are loaded just before the call to rte_eal_dev_init(). > > -- > David Marchand