From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6646F8E5F for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:51:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n186so4618019wmn.1 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:51:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=Fp373J1IVUg4GPb7jzpsw9XAqBSGAbTeRrgUixSgO/Q=; b=hxTIuedlsSTNc0nP1PsIQh2NP/v6lz0RoSi8Qq3kupYzEqXB9NaOn5OyZP6SBpD/gj PhlKWLNH6BO6+v2zLR/Z3W3ytdlPhsBPobolTC8iIafaYnpngo8l1CGwvETOzZt/SfAv zxXX34P+cZ2wLHODwp1svwDX6RQJnQJTnhc0nH3ATMBt3usrhFXO1dQrYhV3obzP+OII v89O3YnjJVWx6i+F9J6beZ+m+QTO48XkDzjHl84j7nmGdjeniMKcOZxuKlZsCD+IA4BV 8OkN/yiVX0YATygZQ0uDyMtsX6IPr3eHmzj+bAAnETFtUKHG+Gx26tAweGyk5hyUZy9H rq/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=Fp373J1IVUg4GPb7jzpsw9XAqBSGAbTeRrgUixSgO/Q=; b=Dns62iUXYjKomWgck7/hpwgSCi6BZ/mUaH/fzow65nAjIX/BCd0YBNssbtZiKYfI9+ +3BYD+fe3aop/npFkx0SVwWFQyVCaQLDpwxSh1Bscuc5NlYxf7LWfPwVul7MLd3pHhDr zYz29OHdMdULRA+Minhh5XE9RHT+fHfzOCgwvAdTpS3uZFuViIlPGv1jZI0WQcEQoIla TAT2NveNWuQiHJVGwaVynX70w42lVPxCdpWt0OSdpFf62TvF0Rz4hk/wldxfYSepDOpy bKEdy98qyLhXd4lgdfoFl6eZo9aVy0VKhvK7bBP9es5hTUD3JGxfugZLYKlJqiIaAVOz p+1w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdnl1hDHeI3PwkQGkQr9S+2yalqbgOw4Z2/hUj+7hNNoFxk7MB25tM0VFgTxL1aysOCqILtS43zrT5DW7Yf4WkbgrIXQ== X-Received: by 10.28.91.83 with SMTP id p80mr1510889wmb.87.1449784319257; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uw6sm14216835wjc.42.2015.12.10.13.51.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:51:58 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Declan Doherty Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:50:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1630221.0CJlf5Jkii@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1449580985-2692-1-git-send-email-aber@semihalf.com> References: <1449580985-2692-1-git-send-email-aber@semihalf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bond: fix LACP mempool size X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:51:59 -0000 Please Declan, Could you check these patches from Andriy and tell how safe it is for 2.2? Thanks 2015-12-08 14:23, Andriy Berestovskyy: > The following messages might appear after some idle time: > "PMD: Failed to allocate LACP packet from pool" > > The fix ensures the mempool size is greater than the sum > of TX descriptors.