From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
 [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BCE255
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:57:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicmv11 with SMTP id mv11so74048058wic.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=6NkLKvWWlvaU53y8MIulHWCTHoDJIZutxH/939Jn7qY=;
 b=a+1zCVFL8lY3QD3DNBlh3v+PDOrtzp75QxtwF1aVVZ03XyRzVP5A37Ee2m++84lOhj
 mQR0z55pzjPtU1Yt+R+WnnaiO/hIoLtK+gKlvLKol7kTy6fZPd15DRyLySKhszgvTZxQ
 a3Y5dQ6imDPoo3Fr3SCaZrTz7Wf5NzHMurSGAtKk8BzVtUaSIGrD2w6X/L7DSAKtATlU
 E2q/hHHzbJcgFRlDM7gd3qcUrAfKlrHWFGogbkJtyr/BXN3clqgV9cJP0ejpG+6aTbpj
 MAae+TOy8AJqQDCdluukQfwmzmSDkgQuruKbzH+Iwe3+yvzomvNqIOspVnCLjQMK+Sfo
 g92Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzMX7672QvniwbH+kQMhWo9gMSYTIKbfjQ5FpiJD3tjll0ORf4ouwSsXOHXoP6EIY5pk9h
X-Received: by 10.194.95.41 with SMTP id dh9mr3364924wjb.55.1437559075129;
 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q19sm2529163wik.16.2015.07.22.02.57.53
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:56:43 +0200
Message-ID: <1630361.fQpHTpKhcF@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1437558611-11952-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
References: <1437558611-11952-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix compilation issue when
	IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC is disabled
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:57:55 -0000

2015-07-22 10:50, Pablo de Lara:
> ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro uses field rx_free_trigger
> in structure ixgbe_rx_queue, but that field is only defined
> if IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC is enabled, so even though
> that field is not used when it is disabled,
> compiler complains about it.

Why this option is still needed?