From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C2AA0093; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:05:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9431B41152; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:05:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from lb.pantheon.sk (lb.pantheon.sk [46.229.239.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B9F4114F for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:05:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lb.pantheon.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3382D1342BA; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:05:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at siecit.sk Received: from lb.pantheon.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lb.pantheon.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id awpbVC5p4WEP; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:05:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from service-node1.lab.pantheon.local (unknown [46.229.239.141]) by lb.pantheon.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC2113428E; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:05:09 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?q?Juraj=20Linke=C5=A1?= To: thomas@monjalon.net, david.marchand@redhat.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, jerinjacobk@gmail.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, =?UTF-8?q?Juraj=20Linke=C5=A1?= Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64 cross docs improvements/fixes Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:05:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1638875109-5544-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1637229656-21612-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> References: <1637229656-21612-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org The docs are a big outdated and in need of updates. Using CFLAGS and LDFLAGS is an artefact the old build system, Meson doesn't support those well. Numaclt can't be cross compiled with clang. The names of downloaded binaried have an extra -none- in them. And to make these changes more easily understandable, add an example cross file. Juraj Linkeš (4): doc: arm64 cross build CFLAGS/LDFLAGS alternatives doc: arm64 cross build binary names update doc: arm64 cross build numactl compilers docs: add an example arm64 cross file .../linux_gsg/cross_build_dpdk_for_arm64.rst | 69 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1