From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Bili Dong <qobilidop@gmail.com>
Cc: yipeng1.wang@intel.com, Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hash: add XOR32 hash function
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 18:38:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16442264.0ZKypZ73Fx@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFnY8dHZ33SwP0PF9gpxrObL-Q0HPObrDRy+JT+EAfOc7WGzKA@mail.gmail.com>
20/02/2023 18:21, Bili Dong:
> The naming is following the existing CRC32 hash:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v22.11.1/source/lib/hash/rte_hash_crc.h#L168.
> I believe all existing hash functions in DPDK are 32 bits, so "32" didn't
> appear in other hash function names. If we add "32" here, we probably
> should also rename rte_hash_crc(). I'm fine with either option.
Why all functions would be 32-bit?
I don't think we need to rename all.
We can just make the right thing when adding a new function.
What maintainers of rte_hash think?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-20 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 10:30 [PATCH] " Bili Dong
2023-02-15 10:54 ` [PATCH v2] " Bili Dong
2023-02-15 11:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Bili Dong
2023-02-15 11:39 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-15 21:39 ` Bili Dong
2023-02-16 9:49 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-20 13:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-20 17:21 ` Bili Dong
2023-02-20 17:38 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2023-02-20 17:51 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-02-20 17:54 ` Bili Dong
2023-02-20 18:19 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2023-02-20 18:50 ` Bili Dong
2023-02-20 20:10 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2023-02-20 20:17 ` Bili Dong
2023-02-20 20:19 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2023-02-20 20:44 ` Bili Dong
2023-02-20 23:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-02-21 1:38 ` Bili Dong
2023-02-21 16:47 ` [PATCH v4] " Bili Dong
2023-02-21 17:55 ` [PATCH v5] " Bili Dong
2023-02-21 19:37 ` [PATCH v6] " Bili Dong
2023-02-21 21:35 ` Bili Dong
2023-06-12 14:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-15 17:14 ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2023-06-16 17:15 ` Bili Dong
2023-06-17 20:34 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2023-06-20 19:12 ` [PATCH v7 1/1] " Bili Dong
2023-06-28 19:19 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2023-06-29 17:33 ` [PATCH v8] " Bili Dong
2023-07-06 20:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-10 22:01 ` Bili Dong
2023-07-10 21:59 ` [PATCH v9] " Bili Dong
2023-09-29 15:38 ` David Marchand
2023-10-03 16:51 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2023-10-06 8:06 ` David Marchand
2023-06-17 20:59 ` [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2023-06-20 19:27 ` Bili Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16442264.0ZKypZ73Fx@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qobilidop@gmail.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).