From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5FD728B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:47:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D1220F30;
 Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:47:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:47:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ZeLJY6aOWJGMq96eVUZjT0p4H6
 +e3ZHwVqZLOdNwoE8=; b=gtqty/oVcpCis6wI+KH0RF0JC/oOW/yS+Vg0accP3I
 sNmJ4WHJpOSLT4aOmzVP+/nO8MiUk0CCnBKStq532jpcULRNtNECiRupEoroxT5F
 ZKOWoO1v/JvRmjw/4x1WaYqvnIqBjuPRJ04NcQLU63JiVCE3ovLTDlhPcbS2owSe
 Q=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ZeLJY6
 aOWJGMq96eVUZjT0p4H6+e3ZHwVqZLOdNwoE8=; b=PP6BKfgEviGl94m6d0SgLs
 JGPsnfSPHXEUvaF0HPePyMx+XrO/mZU9YmPfS5EDlvKYAGdE2cjxfjGdeUdCWHbu
 SATc4sMMbuj5MAsUL4Mm5/xlVuE0l7uXE1xRQ+Bky3xAmN5CFIbmw6c1aSEMXHvT
 D2dB3FdGQKMmj/Kf9w3NYzjJaqdjUYm82XEA1ZquE736c4/Hv7W6P2db550vpbTf
 HOY/16bH8LCQec+2bGTJ9e2yJik/F552ZJWMVhIkCuL/xII+ycBQhgKB5C4Hnyly
 kav1YjAeiHqDuJYhGeGaenPIqOgcftF8andBZqM1T3NpgY3Q9Rz2/IXA+fJu4rWQ
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:-lu-WtfS40pPVDfn1IDuV93TpyLu9-asWhIkkK47jgwfxT5nIaYsnw>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 584F810255;
 Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:47:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
 Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Shijith Thotton <shijith.thotton@cavium.com>,
 Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>,
 John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>, Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
 Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
 Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
 Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
 Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>,
 Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
 Tomasz Duszynski <tdu@semihalf.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@arm.com>,
 Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>,
 Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
 Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>,
 Harish Patil <harish.patil@cavium.com>,
 Rasesh Mody <rasesh.mody@cavium.com>,
 Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
 Allain Legacy <allain.legacy@windriver.com>,
 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>,
 Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:46:48 +0200
Message-ID: <1644846.U24NRPAHE1@xps>
In-Reply-To: <93ee347b-3474-30c5-d35e-cd2766dcb34a@solarflare.com>
References: <2759953.P7QpFFSjiU@xps>
 <93ee347b-3474-30c5-d35e-cd2766dcb34a@solarflare.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Survey for final decision about per-port offload API
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:47:07 -0000

30/03/2018 17:13, Andrew Rybchenko:
> On 03/30/2018 04:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > There is the same kind of confusion in the offload capabilities:
> > 	rte_eth_dev_info.[rt]x_offload_capa
> > 	rte_eth_dev_info.[rt]x_queue_offload_capa
> > The queue capabilities must be a subset of port capabilities,
> > i.e. every queue capabilities must be reported as port capabilities.
> > But the port capabilities should be reported at queue level
> > only if it can be applied to a specific queue.
> >
> > 4/ Do you agree with above statement (to be added in the doc)?
> 
> Yes, may be it would be good to be more precise what "can be applied" mean.
> As I understand it is "can be enabled on queue when it is disabled on 
> port level".

Yes, "can be applied to a specific queue" means
"can be enabled on queue when it is disabled on port level".

Thanks for answering the survey.