From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDD9A0525; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 11:07:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7151B952; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 11:07:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949791B951 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 11:07:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC255FE; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 05:07:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 16 Feb 2020 05:07:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=j7+uxdszDB5M/I++N6oPa18/SLg3eWKdltkv+vAoeXw=; b=UMPjX5IOv/PG mt7xmCZOHgUYCFY0SERGpvSTqOaCBCynbujzdk/yLYevgb+a0SZwxsar4nLfykoE MNqW4NB6+qKFvdFdQW6B2aMzFP16eR81NbKCCZLRli/T74puFflmZX6eEAarxuCe AOzWSLmVefPDob5UbGVbldvOgVF16RM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=j7+uxdszDB5M/I++N6oPa18/SLg3eWKdltkv+vAoe Xw=; b=J9B6E5KHA82mYcrAgl8Vr0SjBh/NXpAG9ZblxeRyp5DlXTEDenFxUGw72 6bu9t0kODXo+AsMNAErbgw+ZD9EseIqlmNfjJM8vW9PdbTzwdxekTYiesEizgePe doKkV4VJLpG5eVNdCVz3V594vOl4bgwS8l7xFEbkVHFw+88Qa0op5dQDCd13yc7Y VlwL5B8K/hpZy+7p3qRGAa5yMB4Dix0hAxaEY5yOOvuLj0eF+1+1Yh2HgLV/JxlQ RCDC9pkUGwDyH9mOtg04ZVGAgNyaRrE7BPVC98b1hUeoD6o0RyzkUJVO43C1TEzn v7oD8zynfHZiQ8jwiOXu8dn1NnfOw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrjeeggdduvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1A1413060BE4; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 05:07:32 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, bluca@debian.org Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 11:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: <1645292.esFFXGZ24q@xps> In-Reply-To: <20200103144613.2892178-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> References: <20200103144613.2892178-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: skip processing docs folder if docs disabled X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 03/01/2020 15:46, Bruce Richardson: > While each target is set to be ignored if the docs are disabled in the > meson build, there is little reason to process the docs folder at all. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson > --- > +if not get_option('enable_docs') > + subdir_done() > +endif Why this patch is marked as superseded in patchwork?