From: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com, thomas@monjalon.net
Cc: trix@redhat.com, ray.kinsella@intel.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
mingshan.zhang@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org,
Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] doc: announce changes in bbdev related to enum extension
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:37:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1647542252-35727-2-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1647542252-35727-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
Intent to resolve in DPDK 22.11 historical usage which prevents
graceful extension of enum and API without troublesome ABI breakage
as well as extending API RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT for new operation type
in bbdev.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
index 4e5b23c..ff161c5 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
@@ -112,6 +112,14 @@ Deprecation Notices
session and the private data of session. An opaque pointer can be exposed
directly to application which can be attached to the ``rte_crypto_op``.
+* bbdev: Will fix extending some enum breaking the ABI. Notably
+ deprecating ``RTE_BBDEV_OP_TYPE_COUNT`` terminating the ``rte_bbdev_op_type``
+ and use fixed array size when required to allow for future enum extension.
+ Will also remove some of the inlining when causing ABI future-proof concerns.
+ Will extend API to support new operation type ``RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT`` as per this
+ RFC https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=22111
+ This should be updated in DPDK 22.11.
+
* security: Hide structure ``rte_security_session`` and expose an opaque
pointer for the private data to the application which can be attached
to the packet while enqueuing.
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 18:37 Nicolas Chautru
2022-03-17 18:37 ` Nicolas Chautru [this message]
2022-06-09 0:20 ` [PATCH v3] " Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-09 0:20 ` Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-09 0:34 ` [PATCH v4] " Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-09 0:34 ` Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-09 5:14 ` Hemant Agrawal
2022-06-09 7:53 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-06-17 16:13 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-06-27 20:47 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-06-30 14:52 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-07-05 15:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-07-17 9:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1647542252-35727-2-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=mingshan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ray.kinsella@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).