From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9424BA0487 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:29:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A17C3195; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:29:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2922C38 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:29:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ABB21FA7; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 12:29:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:29:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=pI9terqCOXLevpknpy6X2xzIOMvYBCiXwB6vn02BsZM=; b=so2JZGaYtFRg S/oJqJBDL8rj/gIwdGaopB+K1+vT26xhgcY7qggRtUI1ctJqPyldKKJp+yd6KEc8 Q6RNSuqlSXaCuy0m48UDbLOUj74E8QwZOIQjVchCYAqIDAgdfEc6cwuyMYpNxHAY hI+TRisKbmr3AVcM2pC4983InM68kAw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=pI9terqCOXLevpknpy6X2xzIOMvYBCiXwB6vn02Bs ZM=; b=BBKQn5fhn0rlOkXVLJd9IJ2UFnFzbAVgqh5Pu0O6E/K7PbKqXnlGeBGry 2l6mICbNpchy++QzW2/tHran8Y+60S3MTwQyrB367cX7SgV4ZpEPJg2KUQ7Eu4pI eL9lw9XsHqFieosFgnCyVomRsvT5UnA56eGTLP4UyNuP7tVE9n17Zod1QVd5+hRm Wil//ePoKK+lDl7ckvmcIystXKjTTageHjMN70r1Ay5QwQ49WUNwI0JGVwLPOjsz +DrZPZlCe8ALynJxrpvJ5d4f1mWctFAAboCAMelpDWl++HwtZwpVIgaHbqIUD1QB Nyk5VxkH7j/wZE7u2xrNAv6l5oIYA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrfedvgddutdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DA433380085; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 12:29:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "reshma.pattan@intel.com" , olivier.matz@6wind.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Harman Kalra , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 18:29:25 +0200 Message-ID: <1649425.EjAGamAeX1@xps> In-Reply-To: <1552663632-18742-1-git-send-email-hkalra@marvell.com> References: <1552663632-18742-1-git-send-email-hkalra@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/pdump: enforcing pdump to use sw mempool X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 15/03/2019 16:27, Harman Kalra: > Since pdump uses SW rings to manage packets hence > pdump should use SW ring mempool for managing its > own copy of packets. I'm not sure to understand the reasoning. Reshma, Olivier, Andrew, any opinion? Let's take a decision for this very old patch.