DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaoyong He <chaoyong.he@corigine.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: oss-drivers@corigine.com, niklas.soderlund@corigine.com,
	Chaoyong He <chaoyong.he@corigine.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 12/12] net/nfp: add flower PF rxtx logic
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 18:22:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1660299750-10668-13-git-send-email-chaoyong.he@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1660299750-10668-1-git-send-email-chaoyong.he@corigine.com>

Implements the flower Rx logic. Fallback packets are multiplexed to the
correct representor port based on the prepended metadata. The Rx poll
is set to run on the existing service infrastructure.

For Tx the existing NFP Tx logic is duplicated to keep the Tx two paths
distinct. Flower fallback also adds 8 bytes of metadata to the start of
the packet that has to be adjusted for in the Tx descriptor.

Signed-off-by: Chaoyong He <chaoyong.he@corigine.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>
---
 drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c | 424 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.h |   1 +
 2 files changed, 425 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c
index 8af18d0..bfcf65b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include "nfp_flower_ovs_compat.h"
 #include "nfp_flower_ctrl.h"
 #include "nfp_flower_representor.h"
+#include "nfp_flower_cmsg.h"
 
 #define MAX_PKT_BURST 32
 #define MEMPOOL_CACHE_SIZE 512
@@ -214,6 +215,44 @@
 	.dev_configure          = nfp_net_configure,
 };
 
+static void
+nfp_flower_pf_vnic_poll(struct nfp_app_flower *app_flower)
+{
+	uint16_t i;
+	uint16_t count;
+	uint16_t n_rxq;
+	uint16_t port_id;
+	struct nfp_net_hw *pf_hw;
+	struct rte_mbuf *pkts_burst[MAX_PKT_BURST];
+
+	pf_hw = app_flower->pf_hw;
+
+	n_rxq = pf_hw->eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues;
+	port_id = pf_hw->eth_dev->data->port_id;
+
+	/* Add ability to run Rx queues on multiple service cores? */
+	for (i = 0; i < n_rxq; i++) {
+		count = rte_eth_rx_burst(port_id, i, pkts_burst, MAX_PKT_BURST);
+
+		/*
+		 * Don't expect packets here but free them in case they have
+		 * not been multiplexed to a representor
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(count > 0))
+			rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(pkts_burst, count);
+	}
+}
+
+static int
+nfp_flower_pf_vnic_service(void *arg)
+{
+	struct nfp_app_flower *app_flower = arg;
+
+	nfp_flower_pf_vnic_poll(app_flower);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int
 nfp_flower_ctrl_vnic_service(void *arg)
 {
@@ -225,6 +264,10 @@
 }
 
 static struct rte_service_spec flower_services[NFP_FLOWER_SERVICE_MAX] = {
+	[NFP_FLOWER_SERVICE_PF] = {
+		.name         = "flower_pf_vnic_service",
+		.callback     = nfp_flower_pf_vnic_service,
+	},
 	[NFP_FLOWER_SERVICE_CTRL] = {
 		.name         = "flower_ctrl_vnic_service",
 		.callback     = nfp_flower_ctrl_vnic_service,
@@ -261,6 +304,383 @@
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static inline void
+nfp_flower_parse_metadata(struct nfp_net_rxq *rxq,
+		struct nfp_net_rx_desc *rxd,
+		struct rte_mbuf *mbuf,
+		uint32_t *portid)
+{
+	uint32_t meta_info;
+	uint8_t *meta_offset;
+	struct nfp_net_hw *hw;
+
+	hw = rxq->hw;
+	if (!((hw->ctrl & NFP_NET_CFG_CTRL_RSS) ||
+			(hw->ctrl & NFP_NET_CFG_CTRL_RSS2)))
+		return;
+
+	meta_offset = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, uint8_t *);
+	meta_offset -= NFP_DESC_META_LEN(rxd);
+	meta_info = rte_be_to_cpu_32(*(uint32_t *)meta_offset);
+	meta_offset += 4;
+
+	while (meta_info) {
+		switch (meta_info & NFP_NET_META_FIELD_MASK) {
+		/* Expect flower firmware to only send packets with META_PORTID */
+		case NFP_NET_META_PORTID:
+			*portid = rte_be_to_cpu_32(*(uint32_t *)meta_offset);
+			meta_offset += 4;
+			meta_info >>= NFP_NET_META_FIELD_SIZE;
+			break;
+		default:
+			/* Unsupported metadata can be a performance issue */
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+static inline struct nfp_flower_representor *
+nfp_flower_get_repr(struct nfp_net_hw *hw,
+		uint32_t port_id)
+{
+	uint8_t port;
+	struct nfp_app_flower *app_flower;
+
+	/* Obtain handle to app_flower here */
+	app_flower = nfp_app_flower_priv_get(hw->pf_dev);
+
+	switch (NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_PORT_TYPE(port_id)) {
+	case NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_PORT_TYPE_PHYS_PORT:
+		port =  NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_PORT_PHYS_PORT_NUM(port_id);
+		return app_flower->phy_reprs[port];
+	case NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_PORT_TYPE_PCIE_PORT:
+		port = NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_PORT_VNIC(port_id);
+		return app_flower->vf_reprs[port];
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static uint16_t
+nfp_flower_pf_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue,
+		struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
+		uint16_t nb_pkts)
+{
+	/*
+	 * We need different counters for packets given to the caller
+	 * and packets sent to representors
+	 */
+	int avail = 0;
+	int avail_multiplexed = 0;
+	uint64_t dma_addr;
+	uint32_t meta_portid;
+	uint16_t nb_hold = 0;
+	struct rte_mbuf *mb;
+	struct nfp_net_hw *hw;
+	struct rte_mbuf *new_mb;
+	struct nfp_net_rxq *rxq;
+	struct nfp_net_rx_buff *rxb;
+	struct nfp_net_rx_desc *rxds;
+	struct nfp_flower_representor *repr;
+
+	rxq = rx_queue;
+	if (unlikely(rxq == NULL)) {
+		/*
+		 * DPDK just checks the queue is lower than max queues
+		 * enabled. But the queue needs to be configured
+		 */
+		RTE_LOG_DP(ERR, PMD, "RX Bad queue\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	hw = rxq->hw;
+
+	/*
+	 * This is tunable as we could allow to receive more packets than
+	 * requested if most are multiplexed.
+	 */
+	while (avail + avail_multiplexed < nb_pkts) {
+		rxb = &rxq->rxbufs[rxq->rd_p];
+		if (unlikely(rxb == NULL)) {
+			RTE_LOG_DP(ERR, PMD, "rxb does not exist!\n");
+			break;
+		}
+
+		rxds = &rxq->rxds[rxq->rd_p];
+		if ((rxds->rxd.meta_len_dd & PCIE_DESC_RX_DD) == 0)
+			break;
+
+		/*
+		 * Memory barrier to ensure that we won't do other
+		 * reads before the DD bit.
+		 */
+		rte_rmb();
+
+		/*
+		 * We got a packet. Let's alloc a new mbuf for refilling the
+		 * free descriptor ring as soon as possible
+		 */
+		new_mb = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(rxq->mem_pool);
+		if (unlikely(new_mb == NULL)) {
+			RTE_LOG_DP(DEBUG, PMD,
+			"RX mbuf alloc failed port_id=%u queue_id=%d\n",
+				rxq->port_id, rxq->qidx);
+			nfp_net_mbuf_alloc_failed(rxq);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		nb_hold++;
+
+		/*
+		 * Grab the mbuf and refill the descriptor with the
+		 * previously allocated mbuf
+		 */
+		mb = rxb->mbuf;
+		rxb->mbuf = new_mb;
+
+		PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "Packet len: %u, mbuf_size: %u",
+				rxds->rxd.data_len, rxq->mbuf_size);
+
+		/* Size of this segment */
+		mb->data_len = rxds->rxd.data_len - NFP_DESC_META_LEN(rxds);
+		/* Size of the whole packet. We just support 1 segment */
+		mb->pkt_len = rxds->rxd.data_len - NFP_DESC_META_LEN(rxds);
+
+		if (unlikely((mb->data_len + hw->rx_offset) > rxq->mbuf_size)) {
+			rte_pktmbuf_free(mb);
+			/*
+			 * This should not happen and the user has the
+			 * responsibility of avoiding it. But we have
+			 * to give some info about the error
+			 */
+			RTE_LOG_DP(ERR, PMD,
+				"mbuf overflow likely due to the RX offset.\n"
+				"\t\tYour mbuf size should have extra space for"
+				" RX offset=%u bytes.\n"
+				"\t\tCurrently you just have %u bytes available"
+				" but the received packet is %u bytes long",
+				hw->rx_offset,
+				rxq->mbuf_size - hw->rx_offset,
+				mb->data_len);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		/* Filling the received mbuf with packet info */
+		if (hw->rx_offset)
+			mb->data_off = RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM + hw->rx_offset;
+		else
+			mb->data_off = RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM + NFP_DESC_META_LEN(rxds);
+
+		/* No scatter mode supported */
+		mb->nb_segs = 1;
+		mb->next = NULL;
+
+		mb->port = rxq->port_id;
+		meta_portid = 0;
+
+		/* Checking the RSS flag */
+		nfp_flower_parse_metadata(rxq, rxds, mb, &meta_portid);
+		PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "Received from port %u type %u",
+				NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_PORT_VNIC(meta_portid),
+				NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_PORT_VNIC_TYPE(meta_portid));
+
+		/* Checking the checksum flag */
+		nfp_net_rx_cksum(rxq, rxds, mb);
+
+		if ((rxds->rxd.flags & PCIE_DESC_RX_VLAN) &&
+				(hw->ctrl & NFP_NET_CFG_CTRL_RXVLAN)) {
+			mb->vlan_tci = rte_cpu_to_le_32(rxds->rxd.vlan);
+			mb->ol_flags |= RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN | RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED;
+		}
+
+		repr = nfp_flower_get_repr(hw, meta_portid);
+		if (repr && repr->ring) {
+			PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "Using representor %s", repr->name);
+			rte_ring_enqueue(repr->ring, (void *)mb);
+			avail_multiplexed++;
+		} else if (repr) {
+			PMD_RX_LOG(ERR, "[%u] No ring available for repr_port %s\n",
+					hw->idx, repr->name);
+			PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "Adding the mbuf to the mbuf array passed by the app");
+			rx_pkts[avail++] = mb;
+		} else {
+			PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "Adding the mbuf to the mbuf array passed by the app");
+			rx_pkts[avail++] = mb;
+		}
+
+		/* Now resetting and updating the descriptor */
+		rxds->vals[0] = 0;
+		rxds->vals[1] = 0;
+		dma_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(RTE_MBUF_DMA_ADDR_DEFAULT(new_mb));
+		rxds->fld.dd = 0;
+		rxds->fld.dma_addr_hi = (dma_addr >> 32) & 0xff;
+		rxds->fld.dma_addr_lo = dma_addr & 0xffffffff;
+
+		rxq->rd_p++;
+		if (unlikely(rxq->rd_p == rxq->rx_count))
+			rxq->rd_p = 0;
+	}
+
+	if (nb_hold == 0)
+		return nb_hold;
+
+	PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "RX port_id=%u queue_id=%d, %d packets received",
+			rxq->port_id, rxq->qidx, nb_hold);
+
+	nb_hold += rxq->nb_rx_hold;
+
+	/*
+	 * FL descriptors needs to be written before incrementing the
+	 * FL queue WR pointer
+	 */
+	rte_wmb();
+	if (nb_hold > rxq->rx_free_thresh) {
+		PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "port=%u queue=%d nb_hold=%u avail=%d",
+				rxq->port_id, rxq->qidx, nb_hold, avail);
+		nfp_qcp_ptr_add(rxq->qcp_fl, NFP_QCP_WRITE_PTR, nb_hold);
+		nb_hold = 0;
+	}
+
+	rxq->nb_rx_hold = nb_hold;
+
+	return avail;
+}
+
+static uint16_t
+nfp_flower_pf_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue,
+		struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
+		uint16_t nb_pkts)
+{
+	int i = 0;
+	int pkt_size;
+	int dma_size;
+	uint64_t dma_addr;
+	uint16_t free_descs;
+	uint16_t issued_descs;
+	struct rte_mbuf *pkt;
+	struct nfp_net_hw *hw;
+	struct rte_mbuf **lmbuf;
+	struct nfp_net_txq *txq;
+	struct nfp_net_nfd3_tx_desc txd;
+	struct nfp_net_nfd3_tx_desc *txds;
+
+	txq = tx_queue;
+	hw = txq->hw;
+	txds = &txq->txds[txq->wr_p];
+
+	PMD_TX_LOG(DEBUG, "working for queue %d at pos %u and %u packets",
+			txq->qidx, txq->wr_p, nb_pkts);
+
+	if ((nfp_net_nfd3_free_tx_desc(txq) < nb_pkts) || (nfp_net_nfd3_txq_full(txq)))
+		nfp_net_tx_free_bufs(txq);
+
+	free_descs = (uint16_t)nfp_net_nfd3_free_tx_desc(txq);
+	if (unlikely(free_descs == 0))
+		return 0;
+
+	pkt = *tx_pkts;
+	issued_descs = 0;
+
+	/* Sending packets */
+	while ((i < nb_pkts) && free_descs) {
+		/* Grabbing the mbuf linked to the current descriptor */
+		lmbuf = &txq->txbufs[txq->wr_p].mbuf;
+		/* Warming the cache for releasing the mbuf later on */
+		RTE_MBUF_PREFETCH_TO_FREE(*lmbuf);
+
+		pkt = *(tx_pkts + i);
+
+		if (unlikely(pkt->nb_segs > 1 &&
+				!(hw->cap & NFP_NET_CFG_CTRL_GATHER))) {
+			PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "NFP_NET_CFG_CTRL_GATHER not set");
+			PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "Multisegment packet unsupported");
+			goto xmit_end;
+		}
+
+		/* Checking if we have enough descriptors */
+		if (unlikely(pkt->nb_segs > free_descs))
+			goto xmit_end;
+
+		/*
+		 * Checksum and VLAN flags just in the first descriptor for a
+		 * multisegment packet, but TSO info needs to be in all of them.
+		 */
+		txd.data_len = pkt->pkt_len;
+		nfp_net_nfd3_tx_tso(txq, &txd, pkt);
+		nfp_net_nfd3_tx_cksum(txq, &txd, pkt);
+
+		if ((pkt->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_VLAN) &&
+				(hw->cap & NFP_NET_CFG_CTRL_TXVLAN)) {
+			txd.flags |= PCIE_DESC_TX_VLAN;
+			txd.vlan = pkt->vlan_tci;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * mbuf data_len is the data in one segment and pkt_len data
+		 * in the whole packet. When the packet is just one segment,
+		 * then data_len = pkt_len
+		 */
+		pkt_size = pkt->pkt_len;
+
+		while (pkt) {
+			/* Copying TSO, VLAN and cksum info */
+			*txds = txd;
+
+			/* Releasing mbuf used by this descriptor previously*/
+			if (*lmbuf)
+				rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(*lmbuf);
+
+			/*
+			 * Linking mbuf with descriptor for being released
+			 * next time descriptor is used
+			 */
+			*lmbuf = pkt;
+
+			dma_size = pkt->data_len;
+			dma_addr = rte_mbuf_data_iova(pkt);
+
+			/* Filling descriptors fields */
+			txds->dma_len = dma_size;
+			txds->data_len = txd.data_len;
+			txds->dma_addr_hi = (dma_addr >> 32) & 0xff;
+			txds->dma_addr_lo = (dma_addr & 0xffffffff);
+			ASSERT(free_descs > 0);
+			free_descs--;
+
+			txq->wr_p++;
+			if (unlikely(txq->wr_p == txq->tx_count)) /* wrapping?*/
+				txq->wr_p = 0;
+
+			pkt_size -= dma_size;
+
+			/*
+			 * Making the EOP, packets with just one segment
+			 * the priority
+			 */
+			if (likely(!pkt_size))
+				txds->offset_eop = PCIE_DESC_TX_EOP | FLOWER_PKT_DATA_OFFSET;
+			else
+				txds->offset_eop = 0;
+
+			pkt = pkt->next;
+			/* Referencing next free TX descriptor */
+			txds = &txq->txds[txq->wr_p];
+			lmbuf = &txq->txbufs[txq->wr_p].mbuf;
+			issued_descs++;
+		}
+		i++;
+	}
+
+xmit_end:
+	/* Increment write pointers. Force memory write before we let HW know */
+	rte_wmb();
+	nfp_qcp_ptr_add(txq->qcp_q, NFP_QCP_WRITE_PTR, issued_descs);
+
+	return i;
+}
+
 static void
 nfp_flower_pf_mp_init(__rte_unused struct rte_mempool *mp,
 		__rte_unused void *opaque_arg,
@@ -466,6 +886,8 @@
 
 	/* Add Rx/Tx functions */
 	eth_dev->dev_ops = &nfp_flower_pf_vnic_ops;
+	eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = nfp_flower_pf_recv_pkts;
+	eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = nfp_flower_pf_xmit_pkts;
 
 	/* PF vNIC gets a random MAC */
 	eth_dev->data->mac_addrs = rte_zmalloc("mac_addr", RTE_ETHER_ADDR_LEN, 0);
@@ -910,6 +1332,8 @@
 
 	eth_dev->process_private = cpp;
 	eth_dev->dev_ops = &nfp_flower_pf_vnic_ops;
+	eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = nfp_flower_pf_recv_pkts;
+	eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = nfp_flower_pf_xmit_pkts;
 	rte_eth_dev_probing_finish(eth_dev);
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.h b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.h
index 24fced3..4ac89d1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.h
+++ b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #define _NFP_FLOWER_H_
 
 enum nfp_flower_service {
+	NFP_FLOWER_SERVICE_PF,
 	NFP_FLOWER_SERVICE_CTRL,
 	NFP_FLOWER_SERVICE_MAX
 };
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-12 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-12 10:22 [PATCH v7 00/12] preparation for the rte_flow offload of nfp PMD Chaoyong He
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] net/nfp: move app specific attributes to own struct Chaoyong He
2022-09-05 15:38   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-06  9:20     ` Chaoyong He
2022-09-06  9:35       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] net/nfp: simplify initialization and remove dead code Chaoyong He
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] net/nfp: move app specific init logic to own function Chaoyong He
2022-09-05 15:38   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-06  8:29     ` Chaoyong He
2022-09-06  9:47       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] net/nfp: add initial flower firmware support Chaoyong He
2022-09-05 15:39   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-07  8:22     ` Chaoyong He
2022-09-07 13:24       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] net/nfp: add flower PF setup and mempool init logic Chaoyong He
2022-09-05 15:42   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-06  8:45     ` Chaoyong He
2022-09-06 10:18       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] net/nfp: add flower PF related routines Chaoyong He
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] net/nfp: add flower ctrl VNIC related logics Chaoyong He
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] net/nfp: move common rxtx function for flower use Chaoyong He
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] net/nfp: add flower ctrl VNIC rxtx logic Chaoyong He
2022-09-05 15:42   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] net/nfp: add flower representor framework Chaoyong He
2022-08-12 10:22 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] net/nfp: move rxtx function to header file Chaoyong He
2022-08-12 10:22 ` Chaoyong He [this message]
2022-09-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v7 00/12] preparation for the rte_flow offload of nfp PMD Niklas Söderlund
2022-09-05 15:40 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1660299750-10668-13-git-send-email-chaoyong.he@corigine.com \
    --to=chaoyong.he@corigine.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund@corigine.com \
    --cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).