From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0974B271 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:35:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85AE32FB; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:35:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:35:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=60nSa3qZaAUY2vIDfdIFE4tVuCxo2DuKkTQ45/uYMp4=; b=RFAJc2VFGPFi ukWKnJRwbBuIaF6H6T3Zz0Zd+FLb41bJpmuYToTMVr0thWqeKgpzOBL78t+Sgq2+ 6Y4VcUXdUG6MJgSZWwKP00DRvsxVpgvbEg2dJY4bY45yCCbjm7p0CDF7MoPgj7WJ 13EGO3s+kueSvOvu45J9ET14kEd4o6w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=60nSa3qZaAUY2vIDfdIFE4tVuCxo2DuKkTQ45/uYM p4=; b=5ldJDuK6sJ8nHDGZtlm+xakWtJrhT9i4APpK6xgSc+4DTB5XO7QBjFbT4 61oYkRZ0B7svzNWQWo+6k5y9D3Jh55ZGXHiWSuVbssKkbXIARr5vDS9g+I9JXdBZ J587ZMxu8chpQ63RaEDgoWRXTjfBnXjbhwFbr/Wd6nuTqx6zkyPcCe9sQsR8Owls BwI8NWqqtYCkdCt7lPWM6Hryl60qY3ObUyJAc3gG7oYdVevPI+99T6TsByzBPnNb 3d2/QJpsmjZ0VBh7QVQixl3/ZzAgfm1T4Hmw8LJDGBlDXCHxJxDIuM/H83a2eWfK uXrZVLhp3CuwC1SZ/6zHmrkq8Avkg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrtdeigddukeculddtuddrgedtledrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6376410315; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:35:18 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:35:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1666755.Zq7PloHFGL@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190220093957.GA87164@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190125202642.66559-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258012413B796@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <20190220093957.GA87164@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] test/bpf: move to examples folder X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:35:21 -0000 20/02/2019 10:39, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:35:02AM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > From: Richardson, Bruce > > > > > > The bpf folder didn't actual contain a test application, but instead > > > basic examples of BPF code for use with testpmd. > > > > Might be the better to create app/test-pmf/bpf directory > > and move them into it. > > Konstantin > > > Assume "test-pmd" in the path, right? I actually think they are better in > examples, myself, but no strong opinions. Anyone else have thoughts? > [Thomas, you are generally a good man for having your say - any input > here?] Those BPF programs can be used by any app having BPF loading support, right? So I think the examples/ directory is the right place.