From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C6DA04A4; Mon, 25 May 2020 01:44:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBCF1D5E5; Mon, 25 May 2020 01:44:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47821D5E0 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 01:44:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39946A5A; Sun, 24 May 2020 19:44:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 May 2020 19:44:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= yCroa8igYGdmnRIyn5Kx2flCKbk5RX/ZYOsXsSj1/QQ=; b=oCLtcs1U3cPS+qgY ymcWqDQ98Jps7LyL5fH/RlAx3SGGcqMF5q7k/XB/CXONPRw4dwzAW6OvY2u5mWEh p1ckcOMzkCBSqmw6iPZ5numfKZWdL7n1+m8/A9XoUF/iRGF/YHkYpjegDkErFCVb Ek60e5Phf69Yf4pAvMTyxW8euL+IreU6Mb4T5WENn76Y5woFJXMYa8n49CoP7llk c0RmuqnrTRLsfXlDzq4AeH5qg2rgq76VW43cMeJ88vMuighxKEoS9ixI+r6L6Pte K6vbs0wk+zZ1+sddiJq1Cy+3xhJ0IeNzpQoL2gm6FZddc6BOjhs94D8cY6Me+yFV xFxtzQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=yCroa8igYGdmnRIyn5Kx2flCKbk5RX/ZYOsXsSj1/ QQ=; b=3ZF7TSmDl6h/Xpu4velLgL66ch6q7+dPMBUn+wT4M3BbcmrOtGj2AdW/Z ge7zE7GsWgYndvtYQ8ECOcmByPLJEJugMyivF1w7BkMzerry6dMuepyHP+VDY9jj ZJS4X0VO2GMIDa6JdWU9NVsKn+Rc7/Cu0F6ZKeVBpdffhT+aUB6gz1lvL9M2qqzg MIA5wC8QmXchnoRHhDNoClrddC3Bnnw27dVwnVEV1gnGkqrA9G6K/MvjgnCIHoxL UspergYUnDVokh+7rdzrjlnj7pjgId299Sjjt9G7gaCyT+DoqUS06G17lE0DQOdk CnR4edsz18RzeFtkvwBbnJnF6mcPA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudduledgvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdvffejueetleefieeludduuefgteejleevfeekjeefieegheet ffdvkeefgedunecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrd dvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 97056328005A; Sun, 24 May 2020 19:44:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ray Kinsella , Neil Horman , John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 01:44:00 +0200 Message-ID: <1673507.n9d9JF5DbN@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200523140750.3967959-1-jerinj@marvell.com> References: <20200523140750.3967959-1-jerinj@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce the deprecation of legacy virtio support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 23/05/2020 16:07, jerinj@marvell.com: > From: Jerin Jacob > > The legacy virtio is not architecture agnostics. > It relies on x86 IO port scheme support for its working. > The legacy virtio is only the consumer of RTE_KDRV_NONE in the DPDK > PCI subsystem. Legacy virtio deprecation will also optimize DPDK PCI > enumeration management as it does not need to probe RTE_KDRV_NONE based > devices anymore. > > Deprecation is planned for v20.08 release. > > More details at http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69351/ > > Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com > Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob > --- > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > +* virtio: The legacy virtio is not architecture agnostics. > + It relies on x86 IO port scheme support for its working. > + The legacy virtio is only the consumer of RTE_KDRV_NONE in DPDK PCI subsystem. > + Legacy virtio deprecation will also optimize DPDK PCI enumeration management as > + it does not need to probe RTE_KDRV_NONE based devices anymore. > + Deprecation is planned for v20.08 release. What means deprecation exactly? When the feature is going to be removed? > + More details at http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69351/