From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] pipeline: add statistics for librte_pipeline ports and tables
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 09:29:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1677593.4Cv3TcNdFE@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891263236A93E@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
2015-05-20 23:41, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > 2015-05-20 13:57, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > > > Thanks for the detailed explanation.
> > > >
> > > > You are raising a trade-off problem about
> > > > feature/maintenance/performance.
> > > > I think we must choose among 4 solutions:
> > > > 1/ always enabled
> > > > 2/ build-time log level
> > > > 3/ run-time option
> > > > 4/ build-time option
> > > >
> > > > It's good to have this discussion and let other contributors giving their
> > > > opinion.
> > > >
> > > > 2015-05-19 22:41, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > > > 1. What is the technical solution to avoid performance loss due to stats
> > > > > support?
> > > > > Generally, I would agree with you that config options should be avoided,
> > > > > especially those that alter the API (function prototypes, data structure
> > > > > layouts, etc). Please note this is not the case for any of our patches,
> > > > > as only the stats collection is enabled/disabled, while the data
> > > > > structures and functions are not changed by the build time option.
> > > > >
> > > > > But what can you do for statistics? We all know that collecting the stats
> > > > > sucks up CPU cycles, especially due to memory accesses, so stats always
> > > > > have a run-time cost. Traditionally, stats are typically enabled for
> > > > > debugging purposes and then turned off for the release version when
> > > > > performance is required. How can this be done if build time flags are
> > > > > not used?
> > > >
> > > > Statistics in drivers are always enabled (first solution).
> > > > If those statistics are only used for debugging, why not using the build-
> > > > time option CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL? (second solution)
> > >
> > > Can you please describe what solution 2 on your list (build-time log
> > > level) consists of?
> > >
> > > I see log level useful for printing messages when an event takes place,
> > > but this is not what these stats patches are about. We want to poll
> > > for those counters on demand: if the build-time flag is off, then the
> > > value of those counters is 0; when the build-time is on, then the stats
> > > counters have the real value. Basically, the build-time flag only
> > > enables/disables the update of the counters at run-time, which is where
> > > CPU cycles are consumed. I am not sure how the log levels can help here?
> >
> > I think that counting stats is a kind of logging.
> > Some stats are always counted (see drivers) and you want to use these ones
> > only for debugging (after rebuilding DPDK with some debug options).
> > So I suggest, as second solution, to check CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL is at
> > debug
> > level instead of having one option per module.
> > It would be implemented with "#if RTE_LOG_LEVEL == RTE_LOG_DEBUG" in
> > RTE_PIPELINE_STATS_ADD.
>
> The problem I see with this approach is that you cannot turn off debug
> messages while still having the statistics collected. We should allow
> people to collects the stats without getting the debug messages. How do
> we do this?
By setting build-time log level to debug, you would enable stats and debug
messages. Then you can adjust the log messages level with the run-time
option --log-level.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-21 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 12:15 Michal Jastrzebski
2015-05-05 15:11 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-18 11:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-19 22:41 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-20 0:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-20 13:57 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-20 14:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-20 17:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-20 22:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-20 23:56 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-20 23:41 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-21 7:29 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-05-21 13:33 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-21 14:59 ` Jay Rolette
2015-05-21 16:15 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-25 10:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1677593.4Cv3TcNdFE@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).