From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC9C239 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:46:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE67120222; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 11:46:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:46:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=1Rro6wzqQKxKPvnapuAwgVRFoMi6Igo0NUXnOTKCV4s=; b=rjBTZHwp3mvD QCcmj8zharfBnLTyxFUkQGyvzZwajsosTXxBe8X3GsB65bZtKNu+PoW4bylvVWpp y2FgDml1Vfc+P5KqA19e9YynQpKtXBDaOUdF2MMIZAyiAZAnArxGQRndLmuyhiJq J6j74t1FsNSHtOz3kyZDyZV+AlblsgQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=1Rro6wzqQKxKPvnapuAwgVRFoMi6Igo0NUXnOTKCV 4s=; b=2+RAXuYJCSuX+9T3qCkjUL0TPFLDu0Il9zyYHHzgeIbjewbWelzsRZlET fRbuTqJ2lpzxIa4cuGTZcy2YHZKO827bqHMSNk+jNw8iYsPadxau2rD2AAxcQxJK 51lhmQJ/Bvt/u3W7pcl5Yi6mZe7PYXCNWbvi1rYDbITEzUGzeS0b7T9C2tm17EKM mSKrBTy2lFdeKM5LjtuuW3QTkf7OSGOk18I1vOuINIMRwC0/bKaZBRmSZNKRWtKV 9t3CkmooOwcB0iY9wXmzNeEPX6eeVn62yQ/OR5/OYT5DCBMOP6d6BgCFwuRbKDq9 WTk+JpFgQsLQ4AnPJT7xojTE5Rnjg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrvdehgdelfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epkedurddukeehrddujedvrdeiheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhm rghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (65.172.185.81.rev.sfr.net [81.185.172.65]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C44FBE4B22; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 11:46:45 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , Luca Boccassi , Kevin Traynor , Yongseok Koh , Neil Horman Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 17:46:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1683594.zcY9JutAjD@xps> In-Reply-To: <9400e996-2f6e-d3da-9c95-06e8a42087fd@intel.com> References: <20190122162310.53613-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <3155698.1yX0fgTuye@xps> <9400e996-2f6e-d3da-9c95-06e8a42087fd@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] doc: add deprecation marker usage X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 16:46:54 -0000 01/02/2019 18:06, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/31/2019 5:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> + > >> +Reminder that new API should follow deprecation process to be able to replace old API. > > This last sentence is not clear to me. > > I think you mean the old API should follow deprecation process > > to be removed (replaced). > > Yes, we are trying to say same thing. > > Deprecation process required for replacing API. I think it is important to emphasize that the process applies to removal.