From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB2BA0A0C; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 00:49:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2769740E32; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 00:49:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1368B4069C for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 00:49:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C37B3200657; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:49:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Aug 2021 18:49:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= EhBsuv6Py8/Hn6pmFnu6eKQYg3DyY7eSWQBeFcYgcpA=; b=ETrQYSGFZx7Xu+gi XG8FePSnVAJdIErFdjMikwfvUTUCFSfnttDW2t1YMuuJ4K4hZg2+Ol/wWvURJApf o79YZ7GdyIPrbEpaJd4hyVerXRdFhS4wf6bK1njvifJKxygHPbW+IeYfiKLSvifS OSpVQYgj9CCdyrbRJ8ym9MMj/FiD249Rd2Eyi4Hz2Xy0VRk1it8oII0tvD8qVmA2 iKEhWcxmp9enAyZ+TLU4qWgna3NMZGFgLgXGjrQ1A1321e++OXkt3UxKDrZ+s7GR I8srZivLkyAqRltgBm3XTuXgqhyjnx9TyoXA2QRrKbLgmRACxFjYVp0S7aROW6aA dLLfTA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=EhBsuv6Py8/Hn6pmFnu6eKQYg3DyY7eSWQBeFcYgc pA=; b=XYL//MbnSr2VVr4suNxggm7wHIqubqKsVrwK3lVMSg0i7pz2B6PRW2wgf 7bOTWhREFY4RpC1VFvA9elWmJ0/S28yxljfCZhPCn+E+kyj3w2M8e8q+tyUB+cm/ vKl/4uHEpVtUSamMFDbUjT6kI+HIFcf+1djCia1E/M6P3fv4fqr7gwsN94wQj4rs coKBkLpF9q/UWQyEWj0jEju16vMkDgL3bc+n0BocJBpe0pwd/jbz1oR6dhBqIffn S0OjEQ6IfH/FlaUCXhwUz9nM/fqhx5skOlCGOO3kuisk7ACN3XjCmJ8icP9geWm0 m47lJOd205wLcbfZjwMH1MGlqXw8Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrieefgddtiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehm ohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeegle fghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeuieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgep tdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnh gvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:49:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, chenbo.xia@intel.com, ktraynor@redhat.com, Ray Kinsella Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:49:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1691015.W6E0H3eNrT@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210518073441.2749096-1-thomas@monjalon.net> References: <20210518073441.2749096-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce transition to vDPA port close function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/05/2021 09:34, Thomas Monjalon: > There is a layer violation in the vDPA API which encourages to destroy > a full device with rte_dev_remove() instead of just closing the port. > The plan is to introduce a new function in 21.08, promote in 21.11, > and deprecate rte_vdpa_get_rte_device() in 21.11. I forgot this issue. Let's hope I (or someone else) will introduce the "close" function so we can remove this layer violation from DPDK 22.11.