From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38866A0542; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 19:38:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E43400D5; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 19:38:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B3C40042 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 19:38:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7C732007F1; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:38:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 09 Oct 2022 13:38:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1665337092; x= 1665423492; bh=nO8W228lXjqeBfWRy2l8VeTN5UEbZvyPFjN1I3hFcOA=; b=y 247XPdw2KWMQILX8ho/BPKEozUSJseMi83MmuxCLYdMzjGthieHdMQHETQLLfarA hjQOCaKBNQeiK3t6neHjp+3YYAg5q47DTGyXCY0bfmkA5xwVY85/wb10ipvxF4ft B8RB2FNvEPc1SovQ9enhrNj9XiCoyCz53qMS/63GoEKemIB975ZUpjhtrkQf5+I/ OobYyitGLuEIBsttvob9rRfEXz7teBIpjK038Ln8AS40y2cdRmeJgt0Ls4ky8qVB whDEHZKSNeoQYKRRQQ/q0o09XwnlCGPzs9y325X3neJUAp3x7hS7xvjz1+iCokWM jzbA/j841gi3RM3WG+w0w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1665337092; x= 1665423492; bh=nO8W228lXjqeBfWRy2l8VeTN5UEbZvyPFjN1I3hFcOA=; b=u A7dty1bnGMTD9e30SQQrrkmjU+jmYE1wICLHsEgWqjmRvKzc1cH34W/MOTrLRE+u +sEuk24xIS8hOaPH+clCO9wEM9IkZ7p354g+iLg7W0Cu2lXvajaonYC3+83p3+12 nI6IhTjfDx6RIazdWdsbhN2spJTQlfBTGckRHxdm7bNMqoMIiyeWGD+QktBahbbI PHnHNOjCimjUVWihsqb8+JnQOwDzk8zamXWA31jyWXXpycVS6D+iluUaq872dk+6 jzuuP4lhgchpJh6AO/jkkrWYqu696G6XadPBTeUZZJi6i6TtaUBGxyLWE5DsEsjb zyQyoM5tZEdNjpk81Ui5Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeejuddgudduiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddt ieekgfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:38:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ivan Malov Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Yuying Zhang , Beilei Xing , Qiming Yang , Wenjun Wu , Jiawen Wu , Jian Wang , Qi Zhang , Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar K , Sunil Kumar Kori , Satha Rao , Ajit Khaparde , Somnath Kotur , Andrew Rybchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: clarify deprecation status for flow actions PF and VF Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 19:38:09 +0200 Message-ID: <1697331.yIU609i1g2@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20221005113221.3433890-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> References: <20221005113221.3433890-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 05/10/2022 13:32, Ivan Malov: > These actions have been deprecated since DPDK 21.11 as > ambiguous and hard-to-use, but their removal might not > be popular because net drivers i40e, ixgbe and txgbe > employ these actions in complicated "PF/VF + QUEUE" > tunnel rule support. Maintainers of these drivers > should voice their attitude to the said problem. > > For now, document the status in deprecation notes. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov > Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko Applied, thanks for the clarification. Hope we can resolve it during 22.11-rc2.