From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com (mail-lf0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F8256AB for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:31:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f49.google.com with SMTP id b75so143460608lfg.3 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:31:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PMtDXO95osZwh38FdJccvQgsOKEeKLtgno8F35YRo+E=; b=0DiIron+KLxYhtttYE9i9JWMhLut8XoLPOlEW/YmmYmEvpXiuWNroegyjRl1o8iBIu EotuiIN6tOCo1hrMCu01SSvTUDMQcODT7eA6j8yBoJwMxYSup3Dws6dIgdOQCDQYzxPv dP9x3K0lQ8va0bbY1Lmdidx3ZVfNklwxox17yfrbr86WHxAlbOnlhw8QNO4yzyRx0UQ6 PM6XpwZ2Ky105r0wxRbvOYwz1uQLUhFS3OKzvGCrnpTNV65eosDWupKMp9dHzbuGmK60 RdQLsFh57cnfNIDHZEQJfiU80mLAmq5vFUx9qpe7CVV2M3MUphWJ6wnaYk13hco0uNxz upag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PMtDXO95osZwh38FdJccvQgsOKEeKLtgno8F35YRo+E=; b=mfkG9wNChYCLgrNTH26xUESFxMvgdSsgs1E0LeokN/COtPvs/wVkaTpSsC3ZWzJb/u Ctf6I+OPtRyge+CgvGeh1TLncI1sOWt2dIHM2fapexZjBYUdmYc8yBenMtfcReW/yilq OegVnd9Wb9WKKpCgCP9+hIwVMunLEEV4aSoiuZNCqREDNVklESI5rR4HMmcUY9U7OHx4 8DssWaHruRstDHwz1t0HXN6TJAKbGVwzKB5c2AUlzv6H+4bMZ7oEZeWQlp8zakckHzzS CuI1iQgiSnpi7SJR6Qp9TDrdC/x1pnqxEeBUKg1m+Uo937I3ZRS/m0gL3G+6pCwC2Drg pcIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmGq+fVxSDyqIoDCshOsVlrwi3S2067a5vdLMnMnIKkJPWvnWxjcxswJXrTRwuW1ozK X-Received: by 10.25.74.9 with SMTP id x9mr6999603lfa.176.1476376300433; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 86sm4043574ljb.23.2016.10.13.09.31.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:31:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: John Ousterhout Cc: "Van Haaren, Harry" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:31:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1697764.L6jCD5RFoR@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20161012212917.10760-1-ouster@cs.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: avoid unnecessary conflicts over rte_config file X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:31:41 -0000 2016-10-13 09:20, John Ousterhout: > Hi Harry, > > But, given the existence of the --file-prefix option, isn't it already > unsafe for Collectd to check only for .rte_config? If it's important for > other programs to be able to find the config files, it seems to me that a > more robust mechanism is needed than the current one. +1 And the default location of the file should respect the Linux standards, e.g. .config/dpdk/...