From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Shahed Shaikh <shshaikh@marvell.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/qede: fix performance bottleneck in Rx path
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:41:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16a3812b-8a4d-ba41-d5f4-0f80dd932a4d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190118102930.27487-1-shshaikh@marvell.com>
On 1/18/2019 10:29 AM, Shahed Shaikh wrote:
> Allocating replacement buffer per received packet is expensive.
> Instead, process received packets first and allocate
> replacement buffers in bulk later.
>
> This improves performance by ~25% in terms of PPS on AMD
> platforms.
>
> Fixes: 2ea6f76aff40 ("qede: add core driver")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Shahed Shaikh <shshaikh@marvell.com>
Hi Shahed,
This patch has been sent same day of the RC3, very close to the actual release,
and updating data path of the driver, so not a trivial patch.
Although I tend to accept driver patches late in process this one was too late,
you won't have proper time to fix if any errors detected, but also I can see it
has a good amount performance effect.
I would like to explicitly ask if you are willing to take the risk. If answer is
yes, please also be sure to get Rasesh's ack.
Thanks,
ferruh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-18 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 10:29 Shahed Shaikh
2019-01-18 10:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/qede: fix prefetch from incorrect place in Tx path Shahed Shaikh
2019-01-18 16:58 ` Rasesh Mody
2019-01-18 14:41 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-01-18 14:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/qede: fix performance bottleneck in Rx path Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-18 16:57 ` Rasesh Mody
2019-01-18 23:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-18 16:13 Shahed Shaikh
2019-01-18 17:15 ` Rasesh Mody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16a3812b-8a4d-ba41-d5f4-0f80dd932a4d@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=rmody@marvell.com \
--cc=shshaikh@marvell.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).