[PATCH 15/46] net/sfc: use rte stdatomic API

[Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>]

Replace the use of gcc builtin __atomic_xxx intrinsics with
corresponding rte_atomic_xxx optional rte stdatomic API.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/net/sfc/meson.build       |  5 ++---
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae_counter.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c  |  8 ++++----
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_stats.h       |  8 ++++----
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/meson.build b/drivers/net/sfc/meson.build
index 5adde68..d3603a0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/meson.build
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/meson.build
@@ -47,9 +47,8 @@ int main(void)
     __int128 a = 0;
     __int128 b;
 
-    b = __atomic_load_n(&a, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
-    __atomic_store(&b, &a, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
-    __atomic_store_n(&b, a, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+    b = rte_atomic_load_explicit(&a, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
+    rte_atomic_store_explicit(&b, a, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
     return 0;
 }
 '''
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae_counter.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae_counter.c
index ba17295..a32da84 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae_counter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae_counter.c
@@ -131,8 +131,8 @@
 	 * And it does not depend on different stores/loads in other threads.
 	 * Paired with relaxed ordering in counter increment.
 	 */
-	__atomic_store(&p->reset.pkts_bytes.int128,
-		       &p->value.pkts_bytes.int128, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&p->reset.pkts_bytes.int128,
+		       p->value.pkts_bytes.int128, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
 	p->generation_count = generation_count;
 
 	p->ft_switch_hit_counter = counterp->ft_switch_hit_counter;
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
 	 * at the beginning of delete operation. Release ordering is
 	 * paired with acquire ordering on load in counter increment operation.
 	 */
-	__atomic_store_n(&p->inuse, true, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&p->inuse, true, rte_memory_order_release);
 
 	sfc_info(sa, "enabled MAE counter 0x%x-#%u with reset pkts=%" PRIu64
 		 " bytes=%" PRIu64, counterp->type, mae_counter.id,
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@
 	 * paired with acquire ordering on load in counter increment operation.
 	 */
 	p = &counters->mae_counters[mae_counter->id];
-	__atomic_store_n(&p->inuse, false, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&p->inuse, false, rte_memory_order_release);
 
 	rc = efx_mae_counters_free_type(sa->nic, counter->type, 1, &unused,
 					mae_counter, NULL);
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
 	 * Acquire ordering is paired with release ordering in counter add
 	 * and delete operations.
 	 */
-	__atomic_load(&p->inuse, &inuse, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+	inuse = rte_atomic_load_explicit(&p->inuse, rte_memory_order_acquire);
 	if (!inuse) {
 		/*
 		 * Two possible cases include:
@@ -258,15 +258,15 @@
 	 * And it does not depend on different stores/loads in other threads.
 	 * Paired with relaxed ordering on counter reset.
 	 */
-	__atomic_store(&p->value.pkts_bytes,
-		       &cnt_val.pkts_bytes, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&p->value.pkts_bytes,
+		       cnt_val.pkts_bytes, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
 
 	if (p->ft_switch_hit_counter != NULL) {
 		uint64_t ft_switch_hit_counter;
 
 		ft_switch_hit_counter = *p->ft_switch_hit_counter + pkts;
-		__atomic_store_n(p->ft_switch_hit_counter, ft_switch_hit_counter,
-				 __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+		rte_atomic_store_explicit(p->ft_switch_hit_counter, ft_switch_hit_counter,
+				 rte_memory_order_relaxed);
 	}
 
 	sfc_info(sa, "update MAE counter 0x%x-#%u: pkts+%" PRIu64 "=%" PRIu64
@@ -498,8 +498,8 @@
 		&sa->mae.counter_registry;
 	int32_t rc;
 
-	while (__atomic_load_n(&counter_registry->polling.thread.run,
-			       __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE)) {
+	while (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&counter_registry->polling.thread.run,
+			       rte_memory_order_acquire)) {
 		rc = sfc_mae_counter_poll_packets(sa);
 		if (rc == 0) {
 			/*
@@ -684,8 +684,8 @@
 	int rc;
 
 	/* Ensure that flag is set before attempting to join thread */
-	__atomic_store_n(&counter_registry->polling.thread.run, false,
-			 __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&counter_registry->polling.thread.run, false,
+			 rte_memory_order_release);
 
 	rc = rte_thread_join(counter_registry->polling.thread.id, NULL);
 	if (rc != 0)
@@ -1024,8 +1024,8 @@
 	 * And it does not depend on different stores/loads in other threads.
 	 * Paired with relaxed ordering in counter increment.
 	 */
-	value.pkts_bytes.int128 = __atomic_load_n(&p->value.pkts_bytes.int128,
-						  __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	value.pkts_bytes.int128 = rte_atomic_load_explicit(&p->value.pkts_bytes.int128,
+						  rte_memory_order_relaxed);
 
 	data->hits_set = 1;
 	data->hits = value.pkts - p->reset.pkts;
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c
index ff13795..7275901 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
 	 * Release ordering enforces marker set after data is populated.
 	 * Paired with acquire ordering in sfc_repr_proxy_mbox_handle().
 	 */
-	__atomic_store_n(&mbox->write_marker, true, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&mbox->write_marker, true, rte_memory_order_release);
 
 	/*
 	 * Wait for the representor routine to process the request.
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
 		 * Paired with release ordering in sfc_repr_proxy_mbox_handle()
 		 * on acknowledge write.
 		 */
-		if (__atomic_load_n(&mbox->ack, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
+		if (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&mbox->ack, rte_memory_order_acquire))
 			break;
 
 		rte_delay_ms(1);
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
 	 * Paired with release ordering in sfc_repr_proxy_mbox_send()
 	 * on marker set.
 	 */
-	if (!__atomic_load_n(&mbox->write_marker, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
+	if (!rte_atomic_load_explicit(&mbox->write_marker, rte_memory_order_acquire))
 		return;
 
 	mbox->write_marker = false;
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@
 	 * Paired with acquire ordering in sfc_repr_proxy_mbox_send()
 	 * on acknowledge read.
 	 */
-	__atomic_store_n(&mbox->ack, true, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&mbox->ack, true, rte_memory_order_release);
 }
 
 static void
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_stats.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_stats.h
index 597e14d..25c2b9e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_stats.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_stats.h
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@
 	 * Store the result atomically to guarantee that the reader
 	 * core sees both counter updates together.
 	 */
-	__atomic_store_n(&st->pkts_bytes.int128, result.pkts_bytes.int128,
-			 __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&st->pkts_bytes.int128, result.pkts_bytes.int128,
+			 rte_memory_order_relaxed);
 #else
 	st->pkts += pkts;
 	st->bytes += bytes;
@@ -66,8 +66,8 @@
 sfc_pkts_bytes_get(const union sfc_pkts_bytes *st, union sfc_pkts_bytes *result)
 {
 #if SFC_SW_STATS_ATOMIC
-	result->pkts_bytes.int128 = __atomic_load_n(&st->pkts_bytes.int128,
-						    __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	result->pkts_bytes.int128 = rte_atomic_load_explicit(&st->pkts_bytes.int128,
+						    rte_memory_order_relaxed);
 #else
 	*result = *st;
 #endif
-- 
1.8.3.1