From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EAF1B949 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:25:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484FA22101; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:25:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:25:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=BN682Jy/mAW79ysusvgWcwEiFqsk5ANl4Yppw6mueBQ=; b=ou8hNSYrRmZE KhVfIysjPswZniLDfw/lJ1lWHmamNhKc79ToNTbJeb9GtL5Hn0BY+2ZZVqdp7UsJ S0Om86moez1OgFxSbJI01f2DEAWaUEozHhb6skoA0viFd9pATwnlf+T2LLWG66Sg bVcu37QgGA04dVAhJpQSaX9lxInHSNs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=BN682Jy/mAW79ysusvgWcwEiFqsk5ANl4Yppw6mue BQ=; b=hV1J1Zm3KDoObByZRT6XFRcHj/J1AmBLEmlMwg9QT7ay0neM9edW52mvH f8Rh3oXA/9WtunHQTp1JIzfAMw5gVFLPAcci8tpIGeKU4LcbloFqr2TL+AklpSB0 F5B5UDuqP+Uet0YytubbQfYYVnT5Bg/QEgTwH5SILNzM9XRR0Gzggd/Nawfk9Fj6 /gDdVNoEfhYJjV8BdgxREwmZwGNnRCDVW0NaKTOWNj2cU4cysp+TiiiVMNAThqU3 q1H6q0vCVEsoMAjdBW2z21PLsRdvG0xx8tarviOKcSv1wjpwVBqDpL6BKci0njZM SvLrv7+b43EtMDZ62WmO1Wkp3Nj9Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrfeehgdduiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt tdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfh gggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceo thhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfe drudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D84FB100E4; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:25:26 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: Yongseok Koh , Olivier Matz , Shahaf Shuler , dev@dpdk.org, roszenrami@gmail.com Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:25:25 +0100 Message-ID: <17192067.ZgxDWLu8L7@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20190109085426.39965-1-yskoh@mellanox.com> <20190110224030.2671-1-yskoh@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] mbuf: add function returning default buffer address X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:25:29 -0000 11/01/2019 09:11, David Marchand: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:40 PM Yongseok Koh wrote: > > + * @warning > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: This API may change without prior notice. > > + * This will be used by rte_mbuf_to_baddr() which has redundant code once > > + * experimental tag is removed. > > Good point. > I wonder if we have a "todolist" for release n+2 so that we don't forget > about such things to do. > Thomas ? If code comment is not enough, we can use Bugzilla.