From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E4B2E83 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:36:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id p63so60117562wmp.1 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:36:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=eJaVL72XOFN4Ep1iA9E3hYN6YnmK84l6njXSPZCRxBQ=; b=GolfuFzUIyLPe2A28PZvKx9WpSo91Ff9J5q7jWw++TlDSwM2EskXUOXvzPFLA5k/Lm QfDEIZb6J0tq48BVo/sJ/3SgN2ufqL8rVSKL/S/QJotJzScujSKtIAgwaYWJz4xneAiX OFVPeBIaYNq37f0lPUcxU2Tm6s685uay7AY1Crgo5rmA6gprgMtCegH36PMhSq9oKCXP AB83cmLv1QtxkAjzt5aAhmTvOnDxb8Zcccv1HeLv1PDUDr0LPW2MEQctln+NSKXcsSE8 eA+RQHIWs0VoV58DfGENGRWVmYTAej3evkoPdkDwVJ6SyuM8MJl/KbFHog+iVOfVNHCN Ao7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=eJaVL72XOFN4Ep1iA9E3hYN6YnmK84l6njXSPZCRxBQ=; b=WtcaLGXs7jxQF8iJtEZn0wvD17psWtpLO8TZA6PH3DNuqbrbvZUz8nX5Ntj7vi/Suz IxL3r94L8Tclj7zmXCZ77zVPXr7/SUVBy7DiKAJ1K6zpavReqA+P7mx+yn3E9zLPOqHJ zfeUnCip4W6Rw837DjY3BkwxYVDcb1D5gmLKAhF22Jw7yDyWyd4/BKvihBr49kt+EmuE T3NoCCK8SW20nAiK4xrHEOo8HQeODl66Fw+pmt3av2KO1/Qqj0LhvIpvCDBa8QVrucg0 aBA7vSq1bKhTb7On/hu5474B3pR9SS0KW8JFCJm+9lsGA3xTibcvOTuyqMjVGcGacM2y WMEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSQVfpBTD2HWt7JAyP7S4+QLjh2ntLtJNoIZ8lhnS4nWBGPiIleZvRVXg+KiFaQuFGp X-Received: by 10.28.105.136 with SMTP id z8mr16023639wmh.71.1455176172482; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:36:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id js8sm6224795wjc.37.2016.02.10.23.36.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:36:11 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Luca Boccassi Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:34:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1719358.h1p3ccrXDn@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1455144896.2805.32.camel@brocade.com> References: <1455144896.2805.32.camel@brocade.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK (and rte_*alloc family) friendly Valgrind X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 07:36:12 -0000 2016-02-10 22:54, Luca Boccassi: I created a set of patches for Valgrind that add support for the > rte_*alloc family of functions. We use it for memcheck (I added support > for other all the other Valgrind tools like cachegrind as well, but it's > less tested), and find it extremely useful, since the vanilla version > cannot intercept and report leaks cause by rte_*alloc functions from > librte_malloc. Thank you Luca. I think it deserves to be visible in the DPDK doc. What about adding some explanations in http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/prog_guide/profile_app.html or http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.html#malloc ?