DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: dev@dpdk.org, Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, john.mcnamara@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: announce ring API change
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 12:16:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <172114315.O9AQeyJeYo@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190118153117.23810-1-gage.eads@intel.com>

18/01/2019 16:31, Gage Eads:
> In order to support the non-blocking ring[1], an API change (additional
> argument to rte_ring_get_memsize()) is required in librte_ring. This commit
> updates the deprecation notice to pave the way for its inclusion in
> 19.05.
> 
> [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-January/123774.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>

Nobody agreed on this change.

Gage, do you still want to push non-blocking ring in 19.05?


---

> +* ring: one change is planned for rte_ring in v19.05:
> +
> +  - rte_ring_get_memsize() will get a new ``flags`` parameter, so it can
> +    calculate the memory required for rings that require more than 8B per entry
> +    (such as the upcoming non-blocking ring).

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-01 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-15 23:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce ring ABI and API changes Gage Eads
2019-01-16  0:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-16 18:21   ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-18 15:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ring API change Gage Eads
2019-01-18 15:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Gage Eads
2019-02-01 11:16     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-02-01 14:18       ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-01 14:36     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Gage Eads
2019-05-09 23:29       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-09 23:29         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-10 14:53         ` Eads, Gage
2019-05-10 14:53           ` Eads, Gage
2019-05-10 14:58           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-10 14:58             ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-10 15:19             ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-05-10 15:19               ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-05-10 16:28               ` Eads, Gage
2019-05-10 16:28                 ` Eads, Gage
2019-05-13 11:46                 ` Olivier Matz
2019-05-13 11:46                   ` Olivier Matz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=172114315.O9AQeyJeYo@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).