From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.212.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E69DC416
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:04:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so102310611wij.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=rA7rkGN6/D5706ii5ugvaat/wA/BnmXiYrPQqXthsis=;
 b=d/icNp0d98EhAZkpS+pYu4LWVUhaaMTdEH0dcR3BtgMe/aPHZlDtXfiomdfz61gkOf
 pRBNXgVgqkETIRUjx7Ut/DJa4NwK9n9Y8u8Y38g6b3iGgENV3CTICHMeAC+FTpisyWwC
 bXDR9rvEyfWLMki7WKf05SrB5mLFBEd9qopIKUPQNlbWOn3q5P2c8ql17kNauA/sOFco
 xBH+yc3K89XeBH4TgiKLK4Yq0uvlR8sVvFo+umhWux2q4FKEZfkUTByIZSFVFJZezC30
 y8Ph95paZ8Il/044BrF+sd3Z8DgD1Tzk2VCJ26GNltEPjezGJBB+09xv3ZPZdZu6Mn5s
 VbVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmq+PwvS2VqBzLG/BdiPuP7isaLTtQO7IPHhsWEv+aKnIw/01RCNLJ7HwJjh8tGOMD42441
X-Received: by 10.180.87.37 with SMTP id u5mr36148289wiz.42.1445443455159;
 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net.
 [82.239.227.177])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9sm11226459wjz.35.2015.10.21.09.04.12
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:03:08 +0200
Message-ID: <1729488.TmXe30SXlp@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAD+H993aWa1=fb2Dts9roLYwUwew-oa+x8zEg7MEy-kjcq5PmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1444992324-5504-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
 <2304404.uKjJZErY2S@xps13>
 <CAD+H993aWa1=fb2Dts9roLYwUwew-oa+x8zEg7MEy-kjcq5PmQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] nfp-uio: new uio driver for netronome
	nfp6000 card
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:04:15 -0000

2015-10-21 16:57, Alejandro Lucero:
> I understand interest for not having another UIO driver does exist. We
> could maintain an external nfp_uio by now till either we get rid of it or
> we definitely find out it is really needed. any chance to accept nfp_uio by
> now?

No, there are some work currently to get rid of igb_uio.
So there are little chances to accept nfp_uio one day.
Please take the first step of integrating your PMD without link interrupt.
Later we'll be able to discuss how to mitigate the interrupt issue.