From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f179.google.com (mail-wr0-f179.google.com [209.85.128.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760029E7 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:47:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f179.google.com with SMTP id o16so173102797wra.1 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:47:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UEJMfpih5rFcbIWAZMt10ypw1IBKxk17Gm1GGUat630=; b=zzulawN0N+zUPk2WBwkZhJHD4grx7Cr4S05owTonT5SIm2C8D9x/7DGQn9h6KoFvMN CQ1ahmxLbOMNV5YdVsmIztcqsYoFnicIRnIeS8CK5Az/MbJ97KezY3ZN00tN141zpYuF p2U3tiUYTpomi5WrvMK38HrCGPUHUK2H3n8ytieLKBKvza4xxPxXNw5GgNVZ+K6yWLlO xkWgIuP3oCURsNK6Yw2VHo9/wJlebIp3rUWSQIybVF2IViLDeqvGy6WOnQDvp5tH0AHd IRRXCl62e25uRHE8eOPCrwfLROMUn1pOTz03+EYe0tCk5IsLJuTM6LNVDWZ/c4nTG7R/ UwuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UEJMfpih5rFcbIWAZMt10ypw1IBKxk17Gm1GGUat630=; b=jMmRg0es6AMQ7Y/mSNgI4QGrWZtQs5XiylJ2EkGRys/M/XffV8J4iYmGGR4p+yLyq2 nAW8kUy67zH+HAdKfK03XCtxMykYQftZVHhoWqwstDGjprKvm1itRxAjURWPK47AysrN 1eCBnsVGmRzfLcUECKUAnrJqD5MYmJaZWo0edXmvBbwcFB9ushv+gsuaBb9PIqwDVPM2 eR9uYIEy8foC3Q8JCo9rBJpouO00Ek7/rmTK0rcFexmmR1DRbHtNUqt9tfZSJSRsNuwB j7RSoKOgFvCJDdKroiviZpELphlotU5v8ytzNXnQEblOGCKzXe74TabOwkMOOdqsjXr/ dIqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nFdnZT8TfQw6rM14RAGEO72unCj0jchhmBS0L/gnoljiY91Ke6VZygdJZD20xNfv8x X-Received: by 10.223.177.18 with SMTP id l18mr25934289wra.96.1487087267174; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:47:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v128sm3986842wmv.2.2017.02.14.07.47.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:47:46 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Doherty, Declan" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Pablo DeLara Guarch Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:47:45 +0100 Message-ID: <17300344.TzMtdF5J0D@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <18f43aad-8ae8-3549-aabb-fa7618b1c36a@intel.com> References: <1522880.cuOTJ3FilR@xps13> <1704265.GvoO55czvH@xps13> <18f43aad-8ae8-3549-aabb-fa7618b1c36a@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] crypto drivers in the API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:47:47 -0000 2017-02-14 14:46, Doherty, Declan: > On 14/02/2017 11:04 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2017-02-14 10:44, Doherty, Declan: > >> On 13/02/2017 1:25 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> In the crypto API, the drivers are listed. > >>> In my opinion, it is a wrong designed and these lists should be removed. > >>> Do we need a deprecation notice to plan this removal in 17.05, while > >>> working on bus abstraction? > >>> > >> ... > >>> > ... > > > > Yes > > If you were planning to do this, you should have sent a deprecation notice > > few weeks ago. > > Please send it now and we'll see if we have enough supporters shortly. > > > > Thomas, there are a couple of other changes we are looking at in the > cryptodev which would require API changes as well as break ABI including > adding support for a multi-device sessions, and changes to crypto > operation layout and field changes for performance but these but will > require RFCs or at least more discussion of the proposals. Given the > time constrains for the V1 deadline for 17.05 I would prefer to work on > the RFCs and get them out as soon as possible over the next few weeks > and then make all the ABI breaking changes in R17.08 in a single release. > > Otherwise we will end up breaking ABI 2 release in a row which I would > like to avoid if possible. OK, seems good. Thanks