From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983BD46079;
Tue, 14 Jan 2025 02:24:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE23402F1;
Tue, 14 Jan 2025 02:23:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D726402B5
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 02:23:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1213)
id 9A4F220591A9; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 17:23:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 9A4F220591A9
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com;
s=default; t=1736817815;
bh=CkBRYtLcDKKV/LioM/c1RLUdrGSIz/YEc1HGqh5Ec2I=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=YvIMtkWfBRnLVpxU0YZE5L9759ZpklYR212ItZD0jeo80QpiQX6NHKgAWw5Ki2V+/
4rHxG9fqyFrM/poed4OK2tpsaOY3fxRXG3jA7IFVywZx9GWmaFFkVbxIzes740VWw6
zzfqOrzT0vujaiVnEb2gLhy+Dc6ZWUkB8IqlfmBU=
From: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v15 05/60] hash: remove use of VLAs for Windows built code
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 17:22:17 -0800
Message-Id: <1736817792-24967-6-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1
In-Reply-To: <1736817792-24967-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
References: <1713397319-26135-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
<1736817792-24967-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
1) ./lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:2362:9
: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘positions’
2) ../lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:2478:9
: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘positions’
Both rte_hash_lookup_bulk_data() and
rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data() expect
@num_keys <= RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX.
So, for both cases it should be safe to replace VLA with fixed size
array.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
---
lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
index 9575e8aa0c..fc93182efe 100644
--- a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
+++ b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
@@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ rte_hash_lookup_bulk_data(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
(num_keys > RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX) ||
(hit_mask == NULL)), -EINVAL);
- int32_t positions[num_keys];
+ int32_t positions[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
__rte_hash_lookup_bulk(h, keys, num_keys, positions, hit_mask, data);
@@ -2534,7 +2534,7 @@ rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data(const struct rte_hash *h,
(num_keys > RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX) ||
(hit_mask == NULL)), -EINVAL);
- int32_t positions[num_keys];
+ int32_t positions[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
__rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk(h, keys, sig, num_keys,
positions, hit_mask, data);
--
2.47.0.vfs.0.3