From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF5D7E89 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id d1so8409183wiv.2 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:43:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=aFEBSO/ULwk5lxWJZCAqCCTTbdgThIoQ7/U9ceT4NrM=; b=TD/QhJCR4vCqKrCiqhtsjeNOf2BrROtOv+58Y5h67sxcB7Qout7KScEMI7+T00bYxF Sq4pH4DzFeKiuDmD5+cf5oZKfyW0YjXUO3C+03SUY65Uo3hJf0JTQ1P4voIReaaUkh3R fpGO6W+XVK2R+CRbMHgGuonPwr4yjefPaZo044iDMmrD8Jj8vJkcd77jI1HAoIDLKYoi v10Rk1PoaSgFjQZBgK3r/oa6M8d78pkakGL97zkGMhTkIcU3bVvjt+y2NVqTfDAF8GpY vkgMOHgA51Bt/BVUQxdk+8L9oantxIN2sBsEgLnloyEXM54fMUfzriJrVEPei2Oo6yvT EDQg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWthL96pAwVzQiVQP0GrNQbF8i4/YO06hE7J7n8f+XUxbWs1kLLJsInuLIDowvDYsRN6C1 X-Received: by 10.180.91.83 with SMTP id cc19mr23339001wib.74.1413841389400; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fm10sm10923138wib.21.2014.10.20.14.43.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:43:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:42:52 +0200 Message-ID: <1739627.QC0qiqQoyT@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-dev] community collaboration X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:34:57 -0000 Hello readers, We are currently targetting a new release (1.8.0) in few weeks. It would be good to have most of the important pending patches in. But writing and sending code is only the first part. After come the reviews. Before integration, we need to validate the design of the new features, check if improvements are really good, be sure that the code is enough commented, maintainable and that there is not (a lot of) typos. In short you can help by making reviews. Anyone is welcome, please consider that reviews are part of the developper job. Please, do not review only patches from your company. I'd prefer cross reviews. I have noticed too many loose reviews when people are from the same one. Thank you very much -- Thomas