DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"fiona.trahe@intel.com" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
	"techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>,
	Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"Somalapuram, Amaranath" <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>,
	Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
	"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
	Nagadheeraj Rottela <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] app: add multi process crypto application
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 22:20:54 +0200
Message-ID: <1741506.OIoGGINOQb@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB31687D34F04FFAEFF8E9A040E67E0@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

15/07/2020 22:15, Akhil Goyal:
> > > I see this application as a useful tool to test the readiness of a driver to be
> > used
> > > in a multi process environment. If app is not a correct place to host it, should it
> > be
> > > added in examples/multi_process/. I also suggested that in v2 but it makes
> > more
> > > sense in app as it is a unit test application which does not have any relevance
> > as
> > > standalone application as crypto may not be used standalone without ethernet
> > > for multi process scenario.
> > > My first preference was to modify l2fwd-crypto to be used as a multi process
> > proof
> > > Application but it also make sense to have a unit test application to verify
> > standalone
> > > crypto PMDs.
> > > Open for comments from other crypto PMD owners.
> > 
> > I agree it looks like unit tests.
> > Can it be added to app/test/test_cryptodev* ?
> > 
> 
> Running two instances of test application will be a challenge I guess.
> If it can be done, I think all the cases covered in test app other than crypto would
> be affected/tested.

Right

> Test-crypto-perf can be a better option but it may defeat the purpose of test-crypto-perf.
> Best would be to make l2fwd-crypto compliant with multi process.

Yes, probably a good idea.

> But still I am ok to have a unit test application.





  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-15 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15 15:50 Arek Kusztal
2020-07-15 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] app: add muli " Arek Kusztal
2020-07-15 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] app/mp_crypto: add device configuration functions Arek Kusztal
2020-07-15 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] app/mp_crypto: add function to allocatie mempools Arek Kusztal
2020-07-15 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] app/mp_crypto: add enqueue-dequeue functions Arek Kusztal
2020-07-15 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] doc: add documentation for multi process crypto app Arek Kusztal
2020-07-15 18:22   ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-22 14:20     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2020-07-23  8:45       ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-15 18:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] app: add multi process crypto application Akhil Goyal
2020-07-15 19:11   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-15 19:25     ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-15 20:06       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-15 20:15         ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-15 20:20           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-08-31 11:50           ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2020-10-08 13:16           ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1741506.OIoGGINOQb@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com \
    --cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=rnagadheeraj@marvell.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git