From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005245B2E for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:30:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9426321EFE; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:30:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:30:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=2LJDtz3navhJPqgV0R5unGQ7SSXokcHimF0Hc6ViKpA=; b=F90GLXTqLfWI xRHjmQ51JTEiLtd962lfplxirXEPTCbZxOUvWD/2IMFUEBcYxUxoJjn1KcUN+PNH vvjDMfoBYSdvz/LzOWS6nuBNa82f8AB/gVaq+K5IHXeQJWZR+3mqEeAJBcou5BUe I24kw6lCasN0q5k/i1MwznUETyFc1lQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=2LJDtz3navhJPqgV0R5unGQ7SSXokcHimF0Hc6ViK pA=; b=SibEeg9UeRdyMzb+BLjMTyZtjHlZvRu0gBbQqbaWGr+/zMGLti4k3JWTP eJbahyax6npN8EH2xdqPizpfEu+UM22J5cS0MDC+AkG056Bfmv9xoAFVhvi0lp8m 4eYuj7Xk5JqPvjPN4ksx+BCZbX+rgy06WP6mJJAI7yCcLN1pQIRxgbh5FHi9sFuL /w5JjV41F60O9vyedfi6oQ3Nw6kHvwayH/QeX3zn+U/zvxNB+5mdy51/cdb5F+LK nG9CBduWg454MBWu0UTUvirYsZbwcgiBZG7BtBAHJiZ4Gkg+Pvv7l1ZelqQP045C mPA44wkI+nEUnCUHv7pjcnJorGxXw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrtdehgdeigeculddtuddrgedutddrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvden ucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrg hlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9271610319; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:30:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Gage Eads Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 15:30:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1742818.CN8ABES3X5@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190403232020.12784-2-gage.eads@intel.com> References: <20190403205041.4651-1-gage.eads@intel.com> <20190403232020.12784-1-gage.eads@intel.com> <20190403232020.12784-2-gage.eads@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 13:30:07 -0000 04/04/2019 01:20, Gage Eads: > --- a/mk/rte.app.mk > +++ b/mk/rte.app.mk > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY) += -lrte_security > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_COMPRESSDEV) += -lrte_compressdev > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV) += -lrte_eventdev > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_RAWDEV) += -lrte_rawdev > +_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_STACK) += -lrte_stack > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_TIMER) += -lrte_timer > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MEMPOOL) += -lrte_mempool > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_DRIVER_MEMPOOL_RING) += -lrte_mempool_ring Stack library is used by mempool, so it should appear after mempool in the library list. It is the same as ring lib being after mempool_ring. If you agree, please just tell me without sending a new version, because I'm doing other minor changes (sorting stack near ring in many files). From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92860A0679 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4841B205; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005245B2E for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:30:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9426321EFE; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:30:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:30:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=2LJDtz3navhJPqgV0R5unGQ7SSXokcHimF0Hc6ViKpA=; b=F90GLXTqLfWI xRHjmQ51JTEiLtd962lfplxirXEPTCbZxOUvWD/2IMFUEBcYxUxoJjn1KcUN+PNH vvjDMfoBYSdvz/LzOWS6nuBNa82f8AB/gVaq+K5IHXeQJWZR+3mqEeAJBcou5BUe I24kw6lCasN0q5k/i1MwznUETyFc1lQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=2LJDtz3navhJPqgV0R5unGQ7SSXokcHimF0Hc6ViK pA=; b=SibEeg9UeRdyMzb+BLjMTyZtjHlZvRu0gBbQqbaWGr+/zMGLti4k3JWTP eJbahyax6npN8EH2xdqPizpfEu+UM22J5cS0MDC+AkG056Bfmv9xoAFVhvi0lp8m 4eYuj7Xk5JqPvjPN4ksx+BCZbX+rgy06WP6mJJAI7yCcLN1pQIRxgbh5FHi9sFuL /w5JjV41F60O9vyedfi6oQ3Nw6kHvwayH/QeX3zn+U/zvxNB+5mdy51/cdb5F+LK nG9CBduWg454MBWu0UTUvirYsZbwcgiBZG7BtBAHJiZ4Gkg+Pvv7l1ZelqQP045C mPA44wkI+nEUnCUHv7pjcnJorGxXw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrtdehgdeigeculddtuddrgedutddrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvden ucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrg hlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9271610319; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:30:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Gage Eads Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 15:30:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1742818.CN8ABES3X5@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190403232020.12784-2-gage.eads@intel.com> References: <20190403205041.4651-1-gage.eads@intel.com> <20190403232020.12784-1-gage.eads@intel.com> <20190403232020.12784-2-gage.eads@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190404133001.tNnnEdmgpheFWw9X3g95r-Tz-g6CGXNrvM81QcgGfsQ@z> 04/04/2019 01:20, Gage Eads: > --- a/mk/rte.app.mk > +++ b/mk/rte.app.mk > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY) += -lrte_security > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_COMPRESSDEV) += -lrte_compressdev > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV) += -lrte_eventdev > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_RAWDEV) += -lrte_rawdev > +_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_STACK) += -lrte_stack > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_TIMER) += -lrte_timer > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MEMPOOL) += -lrte_mempool > _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_DRIVER_MEMPOOL_RING) += -lrte_mempool_ring Stack library is used by mempool, so it should appear after mempool in the library list. It is the same as ring lib being after mempool_ring. If you agree, please just tell me without sending a new version, because I'm doing other minor changes (sorting stack near ring in many files).