From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f178.google.com (mail-wj0-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767902A66 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 08:21:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f178.google.com with SMTP id v7so381015080wjy.2 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 23:21:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XrX0XpWwXTOKZcxd7J8zymYpiBaQo0ffQyYAFlh2Wqc=; b=CDbEQKV+Y3ZJFBf+3dKLhNvGPLj8Tj9MTwlvYk2INWxsRthQcvV4k+JYXwZgLOTloc lyU7ipvRD5D2q2FzVhc83bMGCaZEof+n6ah5p8sz9B4bX2e+xlT8XvA14B/d7PrmVcoQ uEvgF/CkjUUHJ4dnIoz/nfOtaQwB4LPD76xEAXeVHv10JCZpt5oxyOrOHe3vPeQCRjPD rLzRvkBQ2BXHy9T/P6EJEB/F1acxP0DPPsKM/+jT3UlcxpRyVaFG0M0107LVOxxnEXje TfCakYpqM9qPBa5CmRSr2PH7YVeZplxFFQvEO91VZIAXl40HCpQzNKZD03BcTHQWVTkR wUCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XrX0XpWwXTOKZcxd7J8zymYpiBaQo0ffQyYAFlh2Wqc=; b=bBOWuiCV4bpZZOtn0ocXmTGlgmWkg/Wip+TjpHPygvo777CwUccfdvdfz/ARxzuGFy jU0BIWz2QA9RXcfNbu2btamiG6Jf0QYg+iNBgI7QPZ9wRYGSK3kUBPydsA0YLfrXmJon JruoCHxNQwBvV46/QsFyHD3bpp4yK75bkH2O+Rf780a3LENqAUzBwTd1xMq50icKTTSL eKcgBIluWI1tS21z/z3LGbCAJce/MWVajE1i3PRDy3BswCT4TvPnqdRSooVibYZZIpcA jehqkMroVtU7DxXll3/OSftPruA92FKfsRsGA0usr7XnZXh6fnMbE9gdE4ee1SmKFQgg cjRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02kvLdKt+/T4Mbyf7llFW5auKO+oX1dVanJCrkyCYmUbLQCPOB6mHDykwo/nbwzigaF X-Received: by 10.194.146.131 with SMTP id tc3mr64398531wjb.129.1481181683037; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 23:21:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e6sm35334893wjw.33.2016.12.07.23.21.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 23:21:22 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Shreyansh Jain Cc: David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 08:21:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1743313.gQvgAgeimG@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1480846288-2517-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> <1524529.OpOKghfniY@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:21:23 -0000 2016-12-08 10:34, Shreyansh Jain: > On Wednesday 07 December 2016 06:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-12-07 18:40, Shreyansh Jain: > >> Is there anything specific that you are looking for in patchset v2? > >> I was thinking of: > >> 0. fixing BSD compilation issue reported by CI > >> 1. improving the test_pci.c > >> 2. hotplugging > >> 3. trying to move PCI to drives/bus/pci/linux/* and resolving how > >> drivers link to it, and how EAL resources like devargs are consumed. > > > > I am concerned about the time needed for all these changes. > > Please let's make sure that the basic parts are well done and pushed, first. > > That's why I suggest to postpone 1, 2 and 3 to next release if possible. > > The priority is to have a clean bus model, > > and if time permits, integrate the NXP driver. > > > > I am absolutely OK with this. > > Just a confirmation, though. Is it OK to have a broken test_pci.c (1) in > a series? It is not getting compiled by default, but it would definitely > not work if compiled (symbols are missing). No, that's why I said "if possible" :). I thought 1. was about improvements. But if it does not compile, it is a must.