[PATCH 0/5] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[PATCH 0/5] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Andre Muezerie (5):
  maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  drivers/net: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  app/test: add tests for portable versions of __builtin_add_overflow

 MAINTAINERS                    |   1 +
 app/test/meson.build           |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c           | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md      |   1 +
 drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c |   9 ++-
 lib/eal/include/meson.build    |   1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h     |  42 +++++++++++
 7 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

--
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH 1/5] maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 60bdcce543..4b03b6752e 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ F: app/test/test_devargs.c
 F: app/test/test_eal*
 F: app/test/test_errno.c
 F: app/test/test_lcores.c
+F: app/test/test_math.c
 F: app/test/test_memcpy*
 F: app/test/test_per_lcore.c
 F: app/test/test_pflock.c
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH 2/5] lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch introduces __rte_add_overflow_u8, __rte_add_overflow_u16
and __rte_add_overflow_u32.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 lib/eal/include/meson.build |  1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h  | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

diff --git a/lib/eal/include/meson.build b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
index d903577caa..041a4105b5 100644
--- a/lib/eal/include/meson.build
+++ b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ headers += files(
         'rte_lcore_var.h',
         'rte_lock_annotations.h',
         'rte_malloc.h',
+        'rte_math.h',
         'rte_mcslock.h',
         'rte_memory.h',
         'rte_memzone.h',
diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..df2f3d4d34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#ifndef _RTE_MATH_H_
+#define _RTE_MATH_H_
+
+/**
+ * @file
+ *
+ * Math function definitions for DPDK.
+ */
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Functions that allow performing simple arithmetic operations together with
+ * checking whether the operations overflowed.
+ * Example of usage:
+ *     uint8_t overflow;
+ *     uint16_t a, b, result;
+ *     a = 1;
+ *     b = 2;
+ *     overflow = __rte_add_overflow_u16(a, b, &result);
+ */
+#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
+#define __rte_add_overflow_u8(a, b, res) _addcarry_u8(0, a, b, res)
+#define __rte_add_overflow_u16(a, b, res) _addcarry_u16(0, a, b, res)
+#define __rte_add_overflow_u32(a, b, res) _addcarry_u32(0, a, b, res)
+#else
+#define __rte_add_overflow_u8(a, b, res) __builtin_add_overflow(a, b, res)
+#define __rte_add_overflow_u16(a, b, res) __builtin_add_overflow(a, b, res)
+#define __rte_add_overflow_u32(a, b, res) __builtin_add_overflow(a, b, res)
+#endif
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

RE: [PATCH 2/5] lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Morten Brørup]

> From: Andre Muezerie [mailto:andremue@linux.microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 2 January 2025 23.33
> 
> __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> version that can also be used with other compilers.
> 
> This patch introduces __rte_add_overflow_u8, __rte_add_overflow_u16
> and __rte_add_overflow_u32.

Instead of the proposed three type-specific macros, add one generic rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) macro, like rte_bit_test() [1] using "_Generic".

[1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v24.11.1/source/lib/eal/include/rte_bitops.h#L130

You may still need the type-specific macros as internal helpers for the MSVC implementation.

Furthermore, a 64 bit variant might be useful.

PS: DPDK naming convention typically uses just "8"/"16"/"32" postfix to the function name, not "_u8"/"_u16"/"_u32".

Re: [PATCH 2/5] lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 09:19:42AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Andre Muezerie [mailto:andremue@linux.microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, 2 January 2025 23.33
> > 
> > __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> > version that can also be used with other compilers.
> > 
> > This patch introduces __rte_add_overflow_u8, __rte_add_overflow_u16
> > and __rte_add_overflow_u32.
> 
> Instead of the proposed three type-specific macros, add one generic rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) macro, like rte_bit_test() [1] using "_Generic".
> 
> [1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v24.11.1/source/lib/eal/include/rte_bitops.h#L130
> 
> You may still need the type-specific macros as internal helpers for the MSVC implementation.
> 
> Furthermore, a 64 bit variant might be useful.
> 
> PS: DPDK naming convention typically uses just "8"/"16"/"32" postfix to the function name, not "_u8"/"_u16"/"_u32".

These are great suggestions. I'll incorporate them in the v2 of this series.

[PATCH 3/5] doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
index f0193502bc..c95a86448d 100644
--- a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
+++ b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ The public API headers are grouped by topics:
   [checksum](@ref rte_cksum.h),
   [config file](@ref rte_cfgfile.h),
   [key/value args](@ref rte_kvargs.h),
+  [math](@ref rte_math.h),
   [argument parsing](@ref rte_argparse.h),
   [ptr_compress](@ref rte_ptr_compress.h),
   [string](@ref rte_string_fns.h),
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH 4/5] drivers/net: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. It should be replaced with
a portable version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
index 56c6c96a95..1fc64b502c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
  */
 
 #include "ice_common.h"
+#include <rte_math.h>
 
 #define GL_MNG_DEF_DEVID 0x000B611C
 
@@ -469,8 +470,6 @@ int ice_read_sr_word(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 *data)
 	return status;
 }
 
-#define check_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow
-
 /**
  * ice_get_pfa_module_tlv - Reads sub module TLV from NVM PFA
  * @hw: pointer to hardware structure
@@ -500,7 +499,7 @@ ice_get_pfa_module_tlv(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 *module_tlv, u16 *module_tlv_len,
 		return status;
 	}
 
-	if (check_add_overflow(pfa_ptr, (u16)(pfa_len - 1), &max_tlv)) {
+	if (__rte_add_overflow_u16(pfa_ptr, (u16)(pfa_len - 1), &max_tlv)) {
 		ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_INIT, "PFA starts at offset %u. PFA length of %u caused 16-bit arithmetic overflow.\n",
 				  pfa_ptr, pfa_len);
 		return ICE_ERR_INVAL_SIZE;
@@ -541,8 +540,8 @@ ice_get_pfa_module_tlv(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 *module_tlv, u16 *module_tlv_len,
 			return ICE_ERR_INVAL_SIZE;
 		}
 
-		if (check_add_overflow(next_tlv, (u16)2, &next_tlv) ||
-		    check_add_overflow(next_tlv, tlv_len, &next_tlv)) {
+		if (__rte_add_overflow_u16(next_tlv, (u16)2, &next_tlv) ||
+		    __rte_add_overflow_u16(next_tlv, tlv_len, &next_tlv)) {
 			ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_INIT, "TLV of type %u and length 0x%04x caused 16-bit arithmetic overflow. The PFA starts at 0x%04x and has length of 0x%04x\n",
 					  tlv_sub_module_type, tlv_len, pfa_ptr, pfa_len);
 			return ICE_ERR_INVAL_SIZE;
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH 5/5] app/test: add tests for portable versions of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch adds tests for these new portable functions, to confirm
they behave the same way across different compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 app/test/meson.build |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c

diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index 22b3291fa6..ab23f8dc79 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ source_file_deps = {
     'test_lpm_perf.c': ['net', 'lpm'],
     'test_malloc.c': [],
     'test_malloc_perf.c': [],
+    'test_math.c': [],
     'test_mbuf.c': ['net'],
     'test_mcslock.c': [],
     'test_member.c': ['member', 'net'],
diff --git a/app/test/test_math.c b/app/test/test_math.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..55fb11f22c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_math.c
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright (C) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <rte_math.h>
+#include <rte_debug.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+
+/* Check condition and return if true. */
+#define TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(X) \
+do { \
+	if (X) { \
+		return -1; \
+	} \
+} while (0)
+
+RTE_LOG_REGISTER(math_logtype_test, test.math, INFO);
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow_u8(uint8_t a, uint8_t b,
+		uint8_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint8_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = __rte_add_overflow_u8(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: __rte_add_overflow_u8(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: __rte_add_overflow_u8(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow_u16(uint16_t a, uint16_t b,
+		uint16_t expected_res, uint16_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint16_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = __rte_add_overflow_u16(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: __rte_add_overflow_u16(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: __rte_add_overflow_u16(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow_u32(uint32_t a, uint32_t b,
+		uint32_t expected_res, uint32_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint32_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = __rte_add_overflow_u32(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: __rte_add_overflow_u32(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: __rte_add_overflow_u32(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow_u8(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u8(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u8(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u8(0, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u8(1, 0xFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u8(2, 0xFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u8(4, 0xFE, 2, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow_u16(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u16(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u16(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u16(0, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u16(1, 0xFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u16(2, 0xFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u16(4, 0xFFFE, 2, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow_u32(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u32(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u32(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u32(0, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u32(1, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u32(2, 0xFFFFFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow_u32(4, 0xFFFFFFFE, 2, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct unit_test_suite math_test_suite = {
+	.suite_name = "math autotest",
+	.setup = NULL,
+	.teardown = NULL,
+	.unit_test_cases = {
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow_u8),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow_u16),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow_u32),
+		TEST_CASES_END()
+	}
+};
+
+static int
+test_math(void)
+{
+	return unit_test_suite_runner(&math_test_suite);
+}
+
+REGISTER_FAST_TEST(math_autotest, true, true, test_math);
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

Re: [PATCH 0/5] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Thu,  2 Jan 2025 14:32:43 -0800
Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:

> __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> version that can also be used with other compilers.
> 
> Andre Muezerie (5):
>   maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
>   lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
>   doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
>   drivers/net: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
>   app/test: add tests for portable versions of __builtin_add_overflow
> 
>  MAINTAINERS                    |   1 +
>  app/test/meson.build           |   1 +
>  app/test/test_math.c           | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  doc/api/doxy-api-index.md      |   1 +
>  drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c |   9 ++-
>  lib/eal/include/meson.build    |   1 +
>  lib/eal/include/rte_math.h     |  42 +++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
> 
> --
> 2.47.0.vfs.0.3
> 

You should add _builtin_add_overflow into the checkpatch naughty list.
Or maybe all the _builtin_XXX functions?

Re: [PATCH 0/5] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 03:51:55PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu,  2 Jan 2025 14:32:43 -0800
> Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> > __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> > version that can also be used with other compilers.
> > 
> > Andre Muezerie (5):
> >   maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> >   lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> >   doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> >   drivers/net: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> >   app/test: add tests for portable versions of __builtin_add_overflow
> > 
> >  MAINTAINERS                    |   1 +
> >  app/test/meson.build           |   1 +
> >  app/test/test_math.c           | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  doc/api/doxy-api-index.md      |   1 +
> >  drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c |   9 ++-
> >  lib/eal/include/meson.build    |   1 +
> >  lib/eal/include/rte_math.h     |  42 +++++++++++
> >  7 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
> >  create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
> > 
> > --
> > 2.47.0.vfs.0.3
> > 
> 
> You should add _builtin_add_overflow into the checkpatch naughty list.
> Or maybe all the _builtin_XXX functions?

Absolutely! Let me add that for a v2 series.

Re: [PATCH 0/5] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:15:31PM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 03:51:55PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu,  2 Jan 2025 14:32:43 -0800
> > Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> > > version that can also be used with other compilers.
> > > 
> > > Andre Muezerie (5):
> > >   maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> > >   lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> > >   doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> > >   drivers/net: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> > >   app/test: add tests for portable versions of __builtin_add_overflow
> > > 
> > >  MAINTAINERS                    |   1 +
> > >  app/test/meson.build           |   1 +
> > >  app/test/test_math.c           | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  doc/api/doxy-api-index.md      |   1 +
> > >  drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c |   9 ++-
> > >  lib/eal/include/meson.build    |   1 +
> > >  lib/eal/include/rte_math.h     |  42 +++++++++++
> > >  7 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
> > >  create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
> > > 
> > > --
> > > 2.47.0.vfs.0.3
> > > 
> > 
> > You should add _builtin_add_overflow into the checkpatch naughty list.
> > Or maybe all the _builtin_XXX functions?
> 
> Absolutely! Let me add that for a v2 series.

Turns out such check was already added recently
(MESSAGE='Using __builtin helpers, prefer EAL macros'), so further changes
needed at this point.

[PATCH v2 0/5] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Andre Muezerie (5):
  maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  drivers/net: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

 MAINTAINERS                    |   1 +
 app/test/meson.build           |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c           | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md      |   1 +
 drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c |   9 +-
 lib/eal/include/meson.build    |   1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h     |  46 +++++++++
 7 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

--
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH v2 1/5] maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 0f940ad713..fb64ba893b 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ F: app/test/test_devargs.c
 F: app/test/test_eal*
 F: app/test/test_errno.c
 F: app/test/test_lcores.c
+F: app/test/test_math.c
 F: app/test/test_memcpy*
 F: app/test/test_per_lcore.c
 F: app/test/test_pflock.c
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH v2 2/5] lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch introduces rte_add_overflow.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 lib/eal/include/meson.build |  1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h  | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

diff --git a/lib/eal/include/meson.build b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
index d903577caa..041a4105b5 100644
--- a/lib/eal/include/meson.build
+++ b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ headers += files(
         'rte_lcore_var.h',
         'rte_lock_annotations.h',
         'rte_malloc.h',
+        'rte_math.h',
         'rte_mcslock.h',
         'rte_memory.h',
         'rte_memzone.h',
diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2f4581f81b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#ifndef _RTE_MATH_H_
+#define _RTE_MATH_H_
+
+/**
+ * @file
+ *
+ * Math function definitions for DPDK.
+ */
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Function that allows performing simple arithmetic operations together with
+ * checking whether the operation overflowed.
+ * Example of usage:
+ *     uint8_t overflow;
+ *     uint16_t a, b, result;
+ *     a = 1;
+ *     b = 2;
+ *     overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &result);
+ */
+#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
+#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
+	uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
+	uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
+	uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
+	uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
+#else
+#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
+	uint8_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint16_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint32_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint64_t : __builtin_add_overflow)(a, b, res)
+#endif
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Bruce Richardson]

On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 12:39:38PM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> version that can also be used with other compilers.
> 
> This patch introduces rte_add_overflow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  lib/eal/include/meson.build |  1 +
>  lib/eal/include/rte_math.h  | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
> 
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/meson.build b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
> index d903577caa..041a4105b5 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/include/meson.build
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ headers += files(
>          'rte_lcore_var.h',
>          'rte_lock_annotations.h',
>          'rte_malloc.h',
> +        'rte_math.h',
>          'rte_mcslock.h',
>          'rte_memory.h',
>          'rte_memzone.h',
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..2f4581f81b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + * Copyright(c) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _RTE_MATH_H_
> +#define _RTE_MATH_H_
> +
> +/**
> + * @file
> + *
> + * Math function definitions for DPDK.
> + */
> +
> +#ifdef __cplusplus
> +extern "C" {
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
> + * Function that allows performing simple arithmetic operations together with
> + * checking whether the operation overflowed.
> + * Example of usage:
> + *     uint8_t overflow;
> + *     uint16_t a, b, result;
> + *     a = 1;
> + *     b = 2;
> + *     overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &result);
> + */
> +#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
> +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> +	uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
> +	uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
> +	uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
> +	uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
> +#else
> +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> +	uint8_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> +	uint16_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> +	uint32_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> +	uint64_t : __builtin_add_overflow)(a, b, res)
> +#endif

For the gcc version, can you just simplify to the one-line below?

#define rte_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow

/Bruce

RE: [PATCH v2 2/5] lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Morten Brørup]

> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, 6 January 2025 12.07
> 
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 12:39:38PM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> > __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> > version that can also be used with other compilers.
> >
> > This patch introduces rte_add_overflow.
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Function that allows performing simple arithmetic operations
> together with
> > + * checking whether the operation overflowed.
> > + * Example of usage:
> > + *     uint8_t overflow;
> > + *     uint16_t a, b, result;
> > + *     a = 1;
> > + *     b = 2;
> > + *     overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &result);
> > + */
> > +#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
> > +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> > +	uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
> > +	uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
> > +	uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
> > +	uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
> > +#else
> > +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> > +	uint8_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > +	uint16_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > +	uint32_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > +	uint64_t : __builtin_add_overflow)(a, b, res)
> > +#endif
> 
> For the gcc version, can you just simplify to the one-line below?
> 
> #define rte_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow

Yes, but then GCC compilation would not fail if "a" has some other type than the four types explicitly supported.
I prefer keeping the method used this v2 patch.

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Bruce Richardson]

On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 12:21:39PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 6 January 2025 12.07
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 12:39:38PM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> > > __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> > > version that can also be used with other compilers.
> > >
> > > This patch introduces rte_add_overflow.
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Function that allows performing simple arithmetic operations
> > together with
> > > + * checking whether the operation overflowed.
> > > + * Example of usage:
> > > + *     uint8_t overflow;
> > > + *     uint16_t a, b, result;
> > > + *     a = 1;
> > > + *     b = 2;
> > > + *     overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &result);
> > > + */
> > > +#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
> > > +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> > > +	uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
> > > +	uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
> > > +	uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
> > > +	uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
> > > +#else
> > > +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> > > +	uint8_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > > +	uint16_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > > +	uint32_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > > +	uint64_t : __builtin_add_overflow)(a, b, res)
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > For the gcc version, can you just simplify to the one-line below?
> > 
> > #define rte_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow
> 
> Yes, but then GCC compilation would not fail if "a" has some other type than the four types explicitly supported.
> I prefer keeping the method used this v2 patch.
>
Is that really a problem? Should our DPDK macro not support all the types
that the GCC builtin supports?

/Bruce

RE: [PATCH v2 2/5] lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Morten Brørup]

> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, 6 January 2025 12.34
> 
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 12:21:39PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, 6 January 2025 12.07
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 12:39:38PM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> > > > __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a
> portable
> > > > version that can also be used with other compilers.
> > > >
> > > > This patch introduces rte_add_overflow.
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Function that allows performing simple arithmetic operations
> > > together with
> > > > + * checking whether the operation overflowed.
> > > > + * Example of usage:
> > > > + *     uint8_t overflow;
> > > > + *     uint16_t a, b, result;
> > > > + *     a = 1;
> > > > + *     b = 2;
> > > > + *     overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &result);
> > > > + */
> > > > +#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
> > > > +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> > > > +	uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
> > > > +	uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
> > > > +	uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
> > > > +	uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
> > > > +#else
> > > > +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> > > > +	uint8_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > > > +	uint16_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > > > +	uint32_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > > > +	uint64_t : __builtin_add_overflow)(a, b, res)
> > > > +#endif
> > >
> > > For the gcc version, can you just simplify to the one-line below?
> > >
> > > #define rte_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow
> >
> > Yes, but then GCC compilation would not fail if "a" has some other
> type than the four types explicitly supported.
> > I prefer keeping the method used this v2 patch.
> >
> Is that really a problem? Should our DPDK macro not support all the
> types
> that the GCC builtin supports?

The DPDK macro should support all the types that both MSVC and GCC supports.
Using _Generic() for GCC is an improvement for the CI to catch MSVC incompatible code when building for GCC.

Only these four unsigned types are supported by the x86_64 intrinsics.
I don't think we need support for more types; but if the need should arise, it can be added later.

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] lib/eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 6 January 2025 12.34
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 12:21:39PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, 6 January 2025 12.07
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 12:39:38PM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> > > > > __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a
> > portable
> > > > > version that can also be used with other compilers.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch introduces rte_add_overflow.
> > > > >
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * Function that allows performing simple arithmetic operations
> > > > together with
> > > > > + * checking whether the operation overflowed.
> > > > > + * Example of usage:
> > > > > + *     uint8_t overflow;
> > > > > + *     uint16_t a, b, result;
> > > > > + *     a = 1;
> > > > > + *     b = 2;
> > > > > + *     overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &result);
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
> > > > > +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> > > > > +	uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
> > > > > +	uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
> > > > > +	uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
> > > > > +	uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
> > > > > +#else
> > > > > +#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
> > > > > +	uint8_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > > > > +	uint16_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > > > > +	uint32_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
> > > > > +	uint64_t : __builtin_add_overflow)(a, b, res)
> > > > > +#endif
> > > >
> > > > For the gcc version, can you just simplify to the one-line below?
> > > >
> > > > #define rte_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow
> > >
> > > Yes, but then GCC compilation would not fail if "a" has some other
> > type than the four types explicitly supported.
> > > I prefer keeping the method used this v2 patch.
> > >
> > Is that really a problem? Should our DPDK macro not support all the
> > types
> > that the GCC builtin supports?
> 
> The DPDK macro should support all the types that both MSVC and GCC supports.
> Using _Generic() for GCC is an improvement for the CI to catch MSVC incompatible code when building for GCC.
> 
> Only these four unsigned types are supported by the x86_64 intrinsics.
> I don't think we need support for more types; but if the need should arise, it can be added later.

Great. Let me know if any further action is needed on this patch.

[PATCH v2 3/5] doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
index f0193502bc..c95a86448d 100644
--- a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
+++ b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ The public API headers are grouped by topics:
   [checksum](@ref rte_cksum.h),
   [config file](@ref rte_cfgfile.h),
   [key/value args](@ref rte_kvargs.h),
+  [math](@ref rte_math.h),
   [argument parsing](@ref rte_argparse.h),
   [ptr_compress](@ref rte_ptr_compress.h),
   [string](@ref rte_string_fns.h),
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH v2 4/5] drivers/net: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. It should be replaced with
a portable version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
index 56c6c96a95..1002a6b59f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
  */
 
 #include "ice_common.h"
+#include <rte_math.h>
 
 #define GL_MNG_DEF_DEVID 0x000B611C
 
@@ -469,8 +470,6 @@ int ice_read_sr_word(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 *data)
 	return status;
 }
 
-#define check_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow
-
 /**
  * ice_get_pfa_module_tlv - Reads sub module TLV from NVM PFA
  * @hw: pointer to hardware structure
@@ -500,7 +499,7 @@ ice_get_pfa_module_tlv(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 *module_tlv, u16 *module_tlv_len,
 		return status;
 	}
 
-	if (check_add_overflow(pfa_ptr, (u16)(pfa_len - 1), &max_tlv)) {
+	if (rte_add_overflow(pfa_ptr, (u16)(pfa_len - 1), &max_tlv)) {
 		ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_INIT, "PFA starts at offset %u. PFA length of %u caused 16-bit arithmetic overflow.\n",
 				  pfa_ptr, pfa_len);
 		return ICE_ERR_INVAL_SIZE;
@@ -541,8 +540,8 @@ ice_get_pfa_module_tlv(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 *module_tlv, u16 *module_tlv_len,
 			return ICE_ERR_INVAL_SIZE;
 		}
 
-		if (check_add_overflow(next_tlv, (u16)2, &next_tlv) ||
-		    check_add_overflow(next_tlv, tlv_len, &next_tlv)) {
+		if (rte_add_overflow(next_tlv, (u16)2, &next_tlv) ||
+		    rte_add_overflow(next_tlv, tlv_len, &next_tlv)) {
 			ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_INIT, "TLV of type %u and length 0x%04x caused 16-bit arithmetic overflow. The PFA starts at 0x%04x and has length of 0x%04x\n",
 					  tlv_sub_module_type, tlv_len, pfa_ptr, pfa_len);
 			return ICE_ERR_INVAL_SIZE;
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH v2 5/5] app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch adds tests for these new portable functions, to confirm
they behave the same way across different compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 app/test/meson.build |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c

diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index d5cb6a7f7a..49e13c5505 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ source_file_deps = {
     'test_lpm_perf.c': ['net', 'lpm'],
     'test_malloc.c': [],
     'test_malloc_perf.c': [],
+    'test_math.c': [],
     'test_mbuf.c': ['net'],
     'test_mcslock.c': [],
     'test_member.c': ['member', 'net'],
diff --git a/app/test/test_math.c b/app/test/test_math.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5b53eba71d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_math.c
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright (C) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <rte_math.h>
+#include <rte_debug.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+#include <inttypes.h>
+
+/* Check condition and return if true. */
+#define TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(X) \
+do { \
+	if (X) { \
+		return -1; \
+	} \
+} while (0)
+
+RTE_LOG_REGISTER(math_logtype_test, test.math, INFO);
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow8(uint8_t a, uint8_t b,
+		uint8_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint8_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow16(uint16_t a, uint16_t b,
+		uint16_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint16_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow32(uint32_t a, uint32_t b,
+		uint32_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint32_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow64(uint64_t a, uint64_t b,
+		uint64_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint64_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64 ") returned"
+			" result 0x%" PRIx64 ", but 0x%" PRIx64 " was expected.",
+			a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64 ") returned"
+			" overflow 0x%x, but 0x%x was expected.",
+			a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow8(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(1, 0xFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(2, 0xFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(4, 0xFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow16(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(1, 0xFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(2, 0xFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(4, 0xFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(
+			0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow32(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(
+			0, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(1, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(2, 0xFFFFFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(4, 0xFFFFFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(
+			0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow64(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			0, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			1, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			2, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			4, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct unit_test_suite math_test_suite = {
+	.suite_name = "math autotest",
+	.setup = NULL,
+	.teardown = NULL,
+	.unit_test_cases = {
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow8),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow16),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow32),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow64),
+		TEST_CASES_END()
+	}
+};
+
+static int
+test_math(void)
+{
+	return unit_test_suite_runner(&math_test_suite);
+}
+
+REGISTER_FAST_TEST(math_autotest, true, true, test_math);
-- 
2.47.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH v3 0/5] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

v3:
- Rebase on top of latest main.

Andre Muezerie (5):
  maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

 MAINTAINERS                          |   1 +
 app/test/meson.build                 |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c                 | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md            |   1 +
 drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c |   9 +-
 lib/eal/include/meson.build          |   1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h           |  46 ++++++++
 7 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

--
2.48.1.vfs.0.0

[PATCH v3 1/5] maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 312e6fcee5..31c25a6fff 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ F: app/test/test_devargs.c
 F: app/test/test_eal*
 F: app/test/test_errno.c
 F: app/test/test_lcores.c
+F: app/test/test_math.c
 F: app/test/test_memcpy*
 F: app/test/test_per_lcore.c
 F: app/test/test_pflock.c
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.0

[PATCH v3 2/5] eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch introduces rte_add_overflow.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 lib/eal/include/meson.build |  1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h  | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

diff --git a/lib/eal/include/meson.build b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
index d903577caa..041a4105b5 100644
--- a/lib/eal/include/meson.build
+++ b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ headers += files(
         'rte_lcore_var.h',
         'rte_lock_annotations.h',
         'rte_malloc.h',
+        'rte_math.h',
         'rte_mcslock.h',
         'rte_memory.h',
         'rte_memzone.h',
diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2f4581f81b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#ifndef _RTE_MATH_H_
+#define _RTE_MATH_H_
+
+/**
+ * @file
+ *
+ * Math function definitions for DPDK.
+ */
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Function that allows performing simple arithmetic operations together with
+ * checking whether the operation overflowed.
+ * Example of usage:
+ *     uint8_t overflow;
+ *     uint16_t a, b, result;
+ *     a = 1;
+ *     b = 2;
+ *     overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &result);
+ */
+#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
+#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
+	uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
+	uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
+	uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
+	uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
+#else
+#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
+	uint8_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint16_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint32_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint64_t : __builtin_add_overflow)(a, b, res)
+#endif
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.0

[PATCH v3 3/5] doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
index b2fc24b3e4..48922054ed 100644
--- a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
+++ b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ The public API headers are grouped by topics:
   [checksum](@ref rte_cksum.h),
   [config file](@ref rte_cfgfile.h),
   [key/value args](@ref rte_kvargs.h),
+  [math](@ref rte_math.h),
   [argument parsing](@ref rte_argparse.h),
   [ptr_compress](@ref rte_ptr_compress.h),
   [string](@ref rte_string_fns.h),
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.0

[PATCH v3 4/5] net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. It should be replaced with
a portable version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
index 56c6c96a95..1002a6b59f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
  */
 
 #include "ice_common.h"
+#include <rte_math.h>
 
 #define GL_MNG_DEF_DEVID 0x000B611C
 
@@ -469,8 +470,6 @@ int ice_read_sr_word(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 *data)
 	return status;
 }
 
-#define check_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow
-
 /**
  * ice_get_pfa_module_tlv - Reads sub module TLV from NVM PFA
  * @hw: pointer to hardware structure
@@ -500,7 +499,7 @@ ice_get_pfa_module_tlv(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 *module_tlv, u16 *module_tlv_len,
 		return status;
 	}
 
-	if (check_add_overflow(pfa_ptr, (u16)(pfa_len - 1), &max_tlv)) {
+	if (rte_add_overflow(pfa_ptr, (u16)(pfa_len - 1), &max_tlv)) {
 		ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_INIT, "PFA starts at offset %u. PFA length of %u caused 16-bit arithmetic overflow.\n",
 				  pfa_ptr, pfa_len);
 		return ICE_ERR_INVAL_SIZE;
@@ -541,8 +540,8 @@ ice_get_pfa_module_tlv(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 *module_tlv, u16 *module_tlv_len,
 			return ICE_ERR_INVAL_SIZE;
 		}
 
-		if (check_add_overflow(next_tlv, (u16)2, &next_tlv) ||
-		    check_add_overflow(next_tlv, tlv_len, &next_tlv)) {
+		if (rte_add_overflow(next_tlv, (u16)2, &next_tlv) ||
+		    rte_add_overflow(next_tlv, tlv_len, &next_tlv)) {
 			ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_INIT, "TLV of type %u and length 0x%04x caused 16-bit arithmetic overflow. The PFA starts at 0x%04x and has length of 0x%04x\n",
 					  tlv_sub_module_type, tlv_len, pfa_ptr, pfa_len);
 			return ICE_ERR_INVAL_SIZE;
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.0

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Bruce Richardson]

On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 08:38:09AM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. It should be replaced with
> a portable version that can also be used with other compilers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
> index 56c6c96a95..1002a6b59f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include "ice_common.h"
> +#include <rte_math.h>
>  
>  #define GL_MNG_DEF_DEVID 0x000B611C
>  
> @@ -469,8 +470,6 @@ int ice_read_sr_word(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 *data)
>  	return status;
>  }
>  
> -#define check_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow
> -

Rather than modifying the base code, can you instead add a #define to the
osdep.h file in the base directory to alias the new function to
__builtin_add_overflow for MSVC. The other files (other than osdep.h) in
the base directory, come from a common/shared source that is not DPDK
specific, so we try to avoid modifying them where possible.

/Bruce

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 04:52:09PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 08:38:09AM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> > __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. It should be replaced with
> > a portable version that can also be used with other compilers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c | 9 ++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
> > index 56c6c96a95..1002a6b59f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >   */
> >  
> >  #include "ice_common.h"
> > +#include <rte_math.h>
> >  
> >  #define GL_MNG_DEF_DEVID 0x000B611C
> >  
> > @@ -469,8 +470,6 @@ int ice_read_sr_word(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 *data)
> >  	return status;
> >  }
> >  
> > -#define check_add_overflow __builtin_add_overflow
> > -
> 
> Rather than modifying the base code, can you instead add a #define to the
> osdep.h file in the base directory to alias the new function to
> __builtin_add_overflow for MSVC. The other files (other than osdep.h) in
> the base directory, come from a common/shared source that is not DPDK
> specific, so we try to avoid modifying them where possible.
> 
> /Bruce

The problem is that the file below defines __builtin_add_overflow itself, so
it does not look like we can completely avoid changing this file.
I can still make the change you asked for, but the patch will have to remove
that define from the file under base.

drivers\net\intel\ice\base\ice_nvm.c
--
Andre Muezerie

[PATCH v3 5/5] app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch adds tests for these new portable functions, to confirm
they behave the same way across different compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 app/test/meson.build |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c

diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index b6285a6b45..05541c2d0f 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ source_file_deps = {
     'test_lpm_perf.c': ['net', 'lpm'],
     'test_malloc.c': [],
     'test_malloc_perf.c': [],
+    'test_math.c': [],
     'test_mbuf.c': ['net'],
     'test_mcslock.c': [],
     'test_member.c': ['member', 'net'],
diff --git a/app/test/test_math.c b/app/test/test_math.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5b53eba71d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_math.c
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright (C) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <rte_math.h>
+#include <rte_debug.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+#include <inttypes.h>
+
+/* Check condition and return if true. */
+#define TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(X) \
+do { \
+	if (X) { \
+		return -1; \
+	} \
+} while (0)
+
+RTE_LOG_REGISTER(math_logtype_test, test.math, INFO);
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow8(uint8_t a, uint8_t b,
+		uint8_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint8_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow16(uint16_t a, uint16_t b,
+		uint16_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint16_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow32(uint32_t a, uint32_t b,
+		uint32_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint32_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow64(uint64_t a, uint64_t b,
+		uint64_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint64_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64 ") returned"
+			" result 0x%" PRIx64 ", but 0x%" PRIx64 " was expected.",
+			a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64 ") returned"
+			" overflow 0x%x, but 0x%x was expected.",
+			a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow8(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(1, 0xFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(2, 0xFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(4, 0xFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow16(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(1, 0xFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(2, 0xFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(4, 0xFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(
+			0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow32(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(
+			0, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(1, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(2, 0xFFFFFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(4, 0xFFFFFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(
+			0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow64(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			0, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			1, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			2, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			4, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct unit_test_suite math_test_suite = {
+	.suite_name = "math autotest",
+	.setup = NULL,
+	.teardown = NULL,
+	.unit_test_cases = {
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow8),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow16),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow32),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow64),
+		TEST_CASES_END()
+	}
+};
+
+static int
+test_math(void)
+{
+	return unit_test_suite_runner(&math_test_suite);
+}
+
+REGISTER_FAST_TEST(math_autotest, true, true, test_math);
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.0

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Patrick Robb]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 166 bytes --]

Recheck-request: iol-intel-Performance

There was an infra failure with the Arm Grace server about 12 hours ago
which caused this failure - sending a retest request.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 204 bytes --]

[PATCH v4 0/5] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

v4:
- Added define in ice_osdep.h to use portable version of
  __builtin_add_overflow when using MSVC.
- Undid all changes from drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c.

v3:
- Rebase on top of latest main.

Andre Muezerie (5):
  maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

 MAINTAINERS                            |   1 +
 app/test/meson.build                   |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c                   | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md              |   1 +
 drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h |   5 +
 lib/eal/include/meson.build            |   1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h             |  46 +++++++
 7 files changed, 225 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

--
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

[PATCH v4 1/5] maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 82f6e2f917..a60fd0f976 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ F: app/test/test_devargs.c
 F: app/test/test_eal*
 F: app/test/test_errno.c
 F: app/test/test_lcores.c
+F: app/test/test_math.c
 F: app/test/test_memcpy*
 F: app/test/test_per_lcore.c
 F: app/test/test_pflock.c
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] maintainers: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 01:00:39PM -0700, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> version that can also be used with other compilers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 82f6e2f917..a60fd0f976 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ F: app/test/test_devargs.c
>  F: app/test/test_eal*
>  F: app/test/test_errno.c
>  F: app/test/test_lcores.c
> +F: app/test/test_math.c
>  F: app/test/test_memcpy*
>  F: app/test/test_per_lcore.c
>  F: app/test/test_pflock.c
> -- 
This patch should be squashed with the last patch actually adding the file.

/Bruce

[PATCH v4 2/5] eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch introduces rte_add_overflow.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 lib/eal/include/meson.build |  1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h  | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

diff --git a/lib/eal/include/meson.build b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
index d903577caa..041a4105b5 100644
--- a/lib/eal/include/meson.build
+++ b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ headers += files(
         'rte_lcore_var.h',
         'rte_lock_annotations.h',
         'rte_malloc.h',
+        'rte_math.h',
         'rte_mcslock.h',
         'rte_memory.h',
         'rte_memzone.h',
diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2f4581f81b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#ifndef _RTE_MATH_H_
+#define _RTE_MATH_H_
+
+/**
+ * @file
+ *
+ * Math function definitions for DPDK.
+ */
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Function that allows performing simple arithmetic operations together with
+ * checking whether the operation overflowed.
+ * Example of usage:
+ *     uint8_t overflow;
+ *     uint16_t a, b, result;
+ *     a = 1;
+ *     b = 2;
+ *     overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &result);
+ */
+#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
+#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
+	uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
+	uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
+	uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
+	uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
+#else
+#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
+	uint8_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint16_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint32_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint64_t : __builtin_add_overflow)(a, b, res)
+#endif
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

[PATCH v4 3/5] doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
index b2fc24b3e4..48922054ed 100644
--- a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
+++ b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ The public API headers are grouped by topics:
   [checksum](@ref rte_cksum.h),
   [config file](@ref rte_cfgfile.h),
   [key/value args](@ref rte_kvargs.h),
+  [math](@ref rte_math.h),
   [argument parsing](@ref rte_argparse.h),
   [ptr_compress](@ref rte_ptr_compress.h),
   [string](@ref rte_string_fns.h),
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] doc/api: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 01:00:41PM -0700, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> version that can also be used with other compilers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  doc/api/doxy-api-index.md | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
> index b2fc24b3e4..48922054ed 100644
> --- a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
> +++ b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
> @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ The public API headers are grouped by topics:
>    [checksum](@ref rte_cksum.h),
>    [config file](@ref rte_cfgfile.h),
>    [key/value args](@ref rte_kvargs.h),
> +  [math](@ref rte_math.h),
>    [argument parsing](@ref rte_argparse.h),
>    [ptr_compress](@ref rte_ptr_compress.h),
>    [string](@ref rte_string_fns.h),
> -- 
Please squash with patch 2, to add the docs along with the new header.

[PATCH v4 4/5] net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. It should be replaced with
a portable version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
index 7b96fcde03..e6c5512430 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <stdbool.h>
 
 #include <rte_common.h>
+#include <rte_math.h>
 #include <rte_memcpy.h>
 #include <rte_malloc.h>
 #include <rte_memzone.h>
@@ -128,6 +129,10 @@ writeq(uint64_t value, volatile void *addr)
 #define wr64(a, reg, value) writeq((value), (a)->hw_addr + (reg))
 #define rd64(a, reg)        readq((a)->hw_addr + (reg))
 
+#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
+#define __builtin_add_overflow rte_add_overflow
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __INTEL_NET_BASE_OSDEP__ */
 
 #ifndef __always_unused
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

[PATCH v4 5/5] app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch adds tests for these new portable functions, to confirm
they behave the same way across different compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 app/test/meson.build |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c

diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index b6285a6b45..05541c2d0f 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ source_file_deps = {
     'test_lpm_perf.c': ['net', 'lpm'],
     'test_malloc.c': [],
     'test_malloc_perf.c': [],
+    'test_math.c': [],
     'test_mbuf.c': ['net'],
     'test_mcslock.c': [],
     'test_member.c': ['member', 'net'],
diff --git a/app/test/test_math.c b/app/test/test_math.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5b53eba71d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_math.c
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright (C) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <rte_math.h>
+#include <rte_debug.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+#include <inttypes.h>
+
+/* Check condition and return if true. */
+#define TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(X) \
+do { \
+	if (X) { \
+		return -1; \
+	} \
+} while (0)
+
+RTE_LOG_REGISTER(math_logtype_test, test.math, INFO);
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow8(uint8_t a, uint8_t b,
+		uint8_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint8_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow16(uint16_t a, uint16_t b,
+		uint16_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint16_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow32(uint32_t a, uint32_t b,
+		uint32_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint32_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow64(uint64_t a, uint64_t b,
+		uint64_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint64_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64 ") returned"
+			" result 0x%" PRIx64 ", but 0x%" PRIx64 " was expected.",
+			a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64 ") returned"
+			" overflow 0x%x, but 0x%x was expected.",
+			a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow8(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(1, 0xFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(2, 0xFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(4, 0xFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow16(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(1, 0xFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(2, 0xFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(4, 0xFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(
+			0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow32(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(
+			0, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(1, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(2, 0xFFFFFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(4, 0xFFFFFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(
+			0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow64(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			0, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			1, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			2, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			4, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct unit_test_suite math_test_suite = {
+	.suite_name = "math autotest",
+	.setup = NULL,
+	.teardown = NULL,
+	.unit_test_cases = {
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow8),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow16),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow32),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow64),
+		TEST_CASES_END()
+	}
+};
+
+static int
+test_math(void)
+{
+	return unit_test_suite_runner(&math_test_suite);
+}
+
+REGISTER_FAST_TEST(math_autotest, true, true, test_math);
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

[PATCH v5 0/3] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

v5:
- Combined patches 1 with 5 and 2 with 3.

v4:
- Added define in ice_osdep.h to use portable version of
  __builtin_add_overflow when using MSVC.
- Undid all changes from drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c.

v3:
- Rebase on top of latest main.

Andre Muezerie (3):
  eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
  app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

 MAINTAINERS                            |   1 +
 app/test/meson.build                   |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c                   | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md              |   1 +
 drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h |   5 +
 lib/eal/include/meson.build            |   1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h             |  46 +++++++
 7 files changed, 225 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

--
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

[PATCH v5 1/3] eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch introduces rte_add_overflow.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 doc/api/doxy-api-index.md   |  1 +
 lib/eal/include/meson.build |  1 +
 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h  | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

diff --git a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
index b2fc24b3e4..48922054ed 100644
--- a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
+++ b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ The public API headers are grouped by topics:
   [checksum](@ref rte_cksum.h),
   [config file](@ref rte_cfgfile.h),
   [key/value args](@ref rte_kvargs.h),
+  [math](@ref rte_math.h),
   [argument parsing](@ref rte_argparse.h),
   [ptr_compress](@ref rte_ptr_compress.h),
   [string](@ref rte_string_fns.h),
diff --git a/lib/eal/include/meson.build b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
index d903577caa..041a4105b5 100644
--- a/lib/eal/include/meson.build
+++ b/lib/eal/include/meson.build
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ headers += files(
         'rte_lcore_var.h',
         'rte_lock_annotations.h',
         'rte_malloc.h',
+        'rte_math.h',
         'rte_mcslock.h',
         'rte_memory.h',
         'rte_memzone.h',
diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2f4581f81b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#ifndef _RTE_MATH_H_
+#define _RTE_MATH_H_
+
+/**
+ * @file
+ *
+ * Math function definitions for DPDK.
+ */
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Function that allows performing simple arithmetic operations together with
+ * checking whether the operation overflowed.
+ * Example of usage:
+ *     uint8_t overflow;
+ *     uint16_t a, b, result;
+ *     a = 1;
+ *     b = 2;
+ *     overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &result);
+ */
+#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
+#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
+	uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
+	uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
+	uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
+	uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
+#else
+#define rte_add_overflow(a, b, res) _Generic((a), \
+	uint8_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint16_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint32_t : __builtin_add_overflow, \
+	uint64_t : __builtin_add_overflow)(a, b, res)
+#endif
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

[PATCH v5 2/3] net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. It should be replaced with
a portable version that can also be used with other compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
index 7b96fcde03..e6c5512430 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <stdbool.h>
 
 #include <rte_common.h>
+#include <rte_math.h>
 #include <rte_memcpy.h>
 #include <rte_malloc.h>
 #include <rte_memzone.h>
@@ -128,6 +129,10 @@ writeq(uint64_t value, volatile void *addr)
 #define wr64(a, reg, value) writeq((value), (a)->hw_addr + (reg))
 #define rd64(a, reg)        readq((a)->hw_addr + (reg))
 
+#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
+#define __builtin_add_overflow rte_add_overflow
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __INTEL_NET_BASE_OSDEP__ */
 
 #ifndef __always_unused
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Bruce Richardson]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 07:33:39AM -0700, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. It should be replaced with
> a portable version that can also be used with other compilers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

[PATCH v5 3/3] app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
version that can also be used with other compilers.

This patch adds tests for these new portable functions, to confirm
they behave the same way across different compilers.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS          |   1 +
 app/test/meson.build |   1 +
 app/test/test_math.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 172 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 82f6e2f917..a60fd0f976 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ F: app/test/test_devargs.c
 F: app/test/test_eal*
 F: app/test/test_errno.c
 F: app/test/test_lcores.c
+F: app/test/test_math.c
 F: app/test/test_memcpy*
 F: app/test/test_per_lcore.c
 F: app/test/test_pflock.c
diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index b6285a6b45..05541c2d0f 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ source_file_deps = {
     'test_lpm_perf.c': ['net', 'lpm'],
     'test_malloc.c': [],
     'test_malloc_perf.c': [],
+    'test_math.c': [],
     'test_mbuf.c': ['net'],
     'test_mcslock.c': [],
     'test_member.c': ['member', 'net'],
diff --git a/app/test/test_math.c b/app/test/test_math.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5b53eba71d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_math.c
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright (C) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <rte_math.h>
+#include <rte_debug.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+#include <inttypes.h>
+
+/* Check condition and return if true. */
+#define TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(X) \
+do { \
+	if (X) { \
+		return -1; \
+	} \
+} while (0)
+
+RTE_LOG_REGISTER(math_logtype_test, test.math, INFO);
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow8(uint8_t a, uint8_t b,
+		uint8_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint8_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow16(uint16_t a, uint16_t b,
+		uint16_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint16_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow32(uint32_t a, uint32_t b,
+		uint32_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint32_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned result 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(overflow, expected_overflow,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%x, 0x%x) returned overflow 0x%x,"
+			" but 0x%x was expected.", a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+verify_add_overflow64(uint64_t a, uint64_t b,
+		uint64_t expected_res, uint8_t expected_overflow)
+{
+	uint64_t res;
+	uint8_t overflow = rte_add_overflow(a, b, &res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64 ") returned"
+			" result 0x%" PRIx64 ", but 0x%" PRIx64 " was expected.",
+			a, b, res, expected_res);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(res, expected_res,
+			"ERROR: rte_add_overflow(0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64 ") returned"
+			" overflow 0x%x, but 0x%x was expected.",
+			a, b, overflow, expected_overflow);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow8(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(1, 0xFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(2, 0xFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(4, 0xFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow8(0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow16(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(0, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(1, 0xFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(2, 0xFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(4, 0xFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow16(
+			0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow32(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(
+			0, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(1, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(2, 0xFFFFFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(4, 0xFFFFFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow32(
+			0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_add_overflow64(void)
+{
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(0, 0, 0, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(0, 1, 1, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			0, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			1, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			2, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 1, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			4, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, 2, 1));
+	TEST_MATH_RETURN_IF_ERROR(verify_add_overflow64(
+			0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct unit_test_suite math_test_suite = {
+	.suite_name = "math autotest",
+	.setup = NULL,
+	.teardown = NULL,
+	.unit_test_cases = {
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow8),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow16),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow32),
+		TEST_CASE(test_add_overflow64),
+		TEST_CASES_END()
+	}
+};
+
+static int
+test_math(void)
+{
+	return unit_test_suite_runner(&math_test_suite);
+}
+
+REGISTER_FAST_TEST(math_autotest, true, true, test_math);
-- 
2.48.1.vfs.0.1

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[David Marchand]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 3:34 PM Andre Muezerie
<andremue@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> version that can also be used with other compilers.
>
> v5:
> - Combined patches 1 with 5 and 2 with 3.
>
> v4:
> - Added define in ice_osdep.h to use portable version of
>   __builtin_add_overflow when using MSVC.
> - Undid all changes from drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c.
>
> v3:
> - Rebase on top of latest main.
>
> Andre Muezerie (3):
>   eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
>   net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
>   app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
>
>  MAINTAINERS                            |   1 +
>  app/test/meson.build                   |   1 +
>  app/test/test_math.c                   | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  doc/api/doxy-api-index.md              |   1 +
>  drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h |   5 +
>  lib/eal/include/meson.build            |   1 +
>  lib/eal/include/rte_math.h             |  46 +++++++
>  7 files changed, 225 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h

I am not a fan of adding such public API, an internal API would be enough.
Do you plan to add more helpers for math operations?

For the current helper, the only user is a driver (base code).
Can't we just wrap a __builtin_add_overflow (under #ifdef msvc) in the
osdep.h header?


-- 
David Marchand

RE: [PATCH v5 0/3] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Morten Brørup]

> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 June 2025 12.08
> 
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 3:34 PM Andre Muezerie
> <andremue@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. There's a need for a portable
> > version that can also be used with other compilers.
> >
> > v5:
> > - Combined patches 1 with 5 and 2 with 3.
> >
> > v4:
> > - Added define in ice_osdep.h to use portable version of
> >   __builtin_add_overflow when using MSVC.
> > - Undid all changes from drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c.
> >
> > v3:
> > - Rebase on top of latest main.
> >
> > Andre Muezerie (3):
> >   eal: add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> >   net/intel: use portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> >   app/test: add tests for portable version of __builtin_add_overflow
> >
> >  MAINTAINERS                            |   1 +
> >  app/test/meson.build                   |   1 +
> >  app/test/test_math.c                   | 170
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  doc/api/doxy-api-index.md              |   1 +
> >  drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h |   5 +
> >  lib/eal/include/meson.build            |   1 +
> >  lib/eal/include/rte_math.h             |  46 +++++++
> >  7 files changed, 225 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 app/test/test_math.c
> >  create mode 100644 lib/eal/include/rte_math.h
> 
> I am not a fan of adding such public API, an internal API would be
> enough.
> Do you plan to add more helpers for math operations?
> 
> For the current helper, the only user is a driver (base code).
> Can't we just wrap a __builtin_add_overflow (under #ifdef msvc) in the
> osdep.h header?

We already have public APIs for bit operations in rte_bitops.h.
This math API follows the same principle; and math operations - just like bit operations - might be useful for DPDK applications, so let's keep it public.

The only issue I have with these (incl. the bit operations) are that they are in the EAL library, although they have absolutely nothing to do with hardware or O/S abstraction, so they really should be in a "utils" library.
But that's another story, so let's not burden Andre with that.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[David Marchand]

On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 12:29 PM Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> > I am not a fan of adding such public API, an internal API would be
> > enough.
> > Do you plan to add more helpers for math operations?
> >
> > For the current helper, the only user is a driver (base code).
> > Can't we just wrap a __builtin_add_overflow (under #ifdef msvc) in the
> > osdep.h header?
>
> We already have public APIs for bit operations in rte_bitops.h.
> This math API follows the same principle; and math operations - just like bit operations - might be useful for DPDK applications, so let's keep it public.

This comparison is poor.

There are many users of bitops in dpdk, and *public* headers needed it.

Here, we have one single function in a driver implementation.
And this code is unused (__builtin_add_overflow -> check_add_overflow
-> ice_get_pfa_module_tlv -> ice_get_link_default_override ->
ice_cfg_phy_fec, with no intree user).


>
> The only issue I have with these (incl. the bit operations) are that they are in the EAL library, although they have absolutely nothing to do with hardware or O/S abstraction, so they really should be in a "utils" library.
> But that's another story, so let's not burden Andre with that.

Orthogonal to the question.


-- 
David Marchand

RE: [PATCH v5 0/3] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Morten Brørup]

> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 June 2025 12.41
> 
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 12:29 PM Morten Brørup
> <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> > > I am not a fan of adding such public API, an internal API would be
> > > enough.
> > > Do you plan to add more helpers for math operations?
> > >
> > > For the current helper, the only user is a driver (base code).
> > > Can't we just wrap a __builtin_add_overflow (under #ifdef msvc) in
> the
> > > osdep.h header?
> >
> > We already have public APIs for bit operations in rte_bitops.h.
> > This math API follows the same principle; and math operations - just
> like bit operations - might be useful for DPDK applications, so let's
> keep it public.
> 
> This comparison is poor.
> 
> There are many users of bitops in dpdk, and *public* headers needed it.

I don't think the number of uses of a generic function should determine if it should be public or private.
The important thing is avoiding copy-pasting.

> 
> Here, we have one single function in a driver implementation.
> And this code is unused (__builtin_add_overflow -> check_add_overflow
> -> ice_get_pfa_module_tlv -> ice_get_link_default_override ->
> ice_cfg_phy_fec, with no intree user).
> 

I'm mainly saying that Andre is doing nothing wrong here; it's a matter of setting the bar for making generic functions part of DPDK's public API.

In this particular case, I don't have a strong opinion on how public the new function is.
Putting it in some generic private header is also perfectly acceptable for me.
Just don't put it directly in the driver; that would lead to copy-paste into other drivers.

> 
> >
> > The only issue I have with these (incl. the bit operations) are that
> they are in the EAL library, although they have absolutely nothing to
> do with hardware or O/S abstraction, so they really should be in a
> "utils" library.
> > But that's another story, so let's not burden Andre with that.
> 
> Orthogonal to the question.

Partly, yes.
But if we had a generic "utils" library, there would be less resistance to adding the new function there than there is to adding it to the EAL API.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] add portable version of __builtin_add_overflow

[Thomas Monjalon]

04/06/2025 13:04, Morten Brørup:
> > From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 4 June 2025 12.41
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 12:29 PM Morten Brørup
> > <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> > > > I am not a fan of adding such public API, an internal API would be
> > > > enough.
> > > > Do you plan to add more helpers for math operations?
> > > >
> > > > For the current helper, the only user is a driver (base code).
> > > > Can't we just wrap a __builtin_add_overflow (under #ifdef msvc) in
> > the
> > > > osdep.h header?
> > >
> > > We already have public APIs for bit operations in rte_bitops.h.
> > > This math API follows the same principle; and math operations - just
> > like bit operations - might be useful for DPDK applications, so let's
> > keep it public.
> > 
> > This comparison is poor.
> > 
> > There are many users of bitops in dpdk, and *public* headers needed it.
> 
> I don't think the number of uses of a generic function should determine if it should be public or private.
> The important thing is avoiding copy-pasting.
> 
> > Here, we have one single function in a driver implementation.
> > And this code is unused (__builtin_add_overflow -> check_add_overflow
> > -> ice_get_pfa_module_tlv -> ice_get_link_default_override ->
> > ice_cfg_phy_fec, with no intree user).
> > 
> 
> I'm mainly saying that Andre is doing nothing wrong here;
> it's a matter of setting the bar for making generic functions part of DPDK's public API.
> 
> In this particular case, I don't have a strong opinion on how public the new function is.
> Putting it in some generic private header is also perfectly acceptable for me.
> Just don't put it directly in the driver; that would lead to copy-paste into other drivers.

We can move it as a public API later if there is a real need.
I don't think it is good to rush on adding new API in general.


> > > The only issue I have with these (incl. the bit operations) are that
> > they are in the EAL library, although they have absolutely nothing to
> > do with hardware or O/S abstraction, so they really should be in a
> > "utils" library.
> > > But that's another story, so let's not burden Andre with that.
> > 
> > Orthogonal to the question.
> 
> Partly, yes.

EAL is also good to abstract compiler differences.
I agree such basic stuff should be in EAL
if we would decide to add it.

> But if we had a generic "utils" library, there would be less resistance
> to adding the new function there than there is to adding it to the EAL API.

It would be the same.
An API is supposed to be maintained forever
and give guidance on what to use.

As a conclusion, I agree with David, it is safe to keep it private
for the unused base function for now.

[PATCH v6 0/1] define __builtin_add_overflow for MSVC

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. A macro needs to be defined
for code using this to be compiled with MSVC.
Since only one driver is using this, this patch adds the macro to
that driver only. It can be moved to some common place if/when
needed.

v6:
- Moved definition of __builtin_add_overflow to the only driver that
  needs it, making it private to that driver.

v5:
- Combined patches 1 with 5 and 2 with 3.

v4:
- Added define in ice_osdep.h to use portable version of
  __builtin_add_overflow when using MSVC.
- Undid all changes from drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_nvm.c.

v3:
- Rebase on top of latest main.

Andre Muezerie (1):
  net/intel: define __builtin_add_overflow for MSVC

 drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--
2.49.0.vfs.0.3

[PATCH v6 1/1] net/intel: define __builtin_add_overflow for MSVC

[Andre Muezerie]

__builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. A macro needs to be defined
for code using this to be compiled with MSVC.
Since only one driver is using this, this patch adds the macro to
that driver only. It can be moved to some common place if/when
needed.

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
index ad6cde9896..4f635f00a4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
@@ -128,6 +128,15 @@ writeq(uint64_t value, volatile void *addr)
 #define wr64(a, reg, value) writeq((value), (a)->hw_addr + (reg))
 #define rd64(a, reg)        readq((a)->hw_addr + (reg))
 
+#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
+#define __builtin_add_overflow(a, b, res) \
+	_Generic((a), \
+		uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
+		uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
+		uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
+		uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __INTEL_NET_BASE_OSDEP__ */
 
 #ifndef __always_unused
-- 
2.49.0.vfs.0.3

RE: [PATCH v6 1/1] net/intel: define __builtin_add_overflow for MSVC

[Morten Brørup]

+TO: David and Thomas, were part of the discussion
+CC: Stephen

> From: Andre Muezerie [mailto:andremue@linux.microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 5 June 2025 16.47
> 
> __builtin_add_overflow is gcc specific. A macro needs to be defined
> for code using this to be compiled with MSVC.
> Since only one driver is using this, this patch adds the macro to
> that driver only. It can be moved to some common place if/when
> needed.

This seems to be consensus over adding it to rte_math.h, so:
Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
> b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
> index ad6cde9896..4f635f00a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/base/ice_osdep.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,15 @@ writeq(uint64_t value, volatile void *addr)
>  #define wr64(a, reg, value) writeq((value), (a)->hw_addr + (reg))
>  #define rd64(a, reg)        readq((a)->hw_addr + (reg))
> 
> +#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
> +#define __builtin_add_overflow(a, b, res) \
> +	_Generic((a), \
> +		uint8_t : _addcarry_u8, \
> +		uint16_t : _addcarry_u16, \
> +		uint32_t : _addcarry_u32, \
> +		uint64_t : _addcarry_u64)(0, a, b, res)
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* __INTEL_NET_BASE_OSDEP__ */
> 
>  #ifndef __always_unused
> --
> 2.49.0.vfs.0.3