From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, "olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"viktorin@rehivetech.com" <viktorin@rehivetech.com>,
Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] usages issue with external mempool
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:09:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17497044.vFCEfOXVbh@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB5PR04MB16059B05C079F2DAAB0E8FE9890F0@DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2016-07-27 16:52, Hemant Agrawal:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > 2016-07-27 13:23, Hemant Agrawal:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > > > 2016-07-27 15:21, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > > If we agree on this then may be I can send the API deprecation
> > > > > notices for rte_mempool_create for v16.11
> > > >
> > > > It would have been a lot better to send a patch during the 16.07
> > > > cycle to avoid breaking again the API.
> > > > I'm afraid it will even be too late for the deprecation notice.
> > >
> > > [Hemant] Yes! It is late.
> > > we can make these changes immediately after 16.07.
> >
> > You cannot change the API in 16.11 without having a deprecation agreement in
> > 16.07.
> [Hemant] Can you still accommodate the deprecation notice for 16.07?
No, I cannot write a deprecation notice for you.
And you must give some time to other developers to review your proposal and
accept it.
You failed to write a patch to modify the new API in 16.07 and
you failed to prepare and discuss a deprecation notice for 16.11.
So I think your best bet is to work now for a change in 17.02.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-28 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-26 10:11 Hemant Agrawal
2016-07-27 9:51 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-27 10:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-27 13:23 ` Hemant Agrawal
2016-07-27 13:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-27 16:52 ` Hemant Agrawal
2016-07-28 7:09 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-07-28 8:32 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-07-28 10:25 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-29 10:09 ` Hemant Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17497044.vFCEfOXVbh@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
--cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).