DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3] Remove validate-abi.sh from tree
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:16:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1755319.1xdlsreqCQ@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422120108.GA864272@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>

22/04/2020 14:01, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 21/04/2020 20:56, Neil Horman:
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 01:46:43PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 21/04/2020 13:12, Neil Horman:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:42:38PM +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote:
> > > > > > On 17/04/2020 13:10, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > > > 17/04/2020 13:47, Ray Kinsella:
> > > > > > >> On 17/04/2020 11:20, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > > >>> 17/04/2020 12:11, Ray Kinsella:
> > > > > > >>>> check-abi.sh appears to be backward step in terms of usability.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> No, check-abi.sh benefits from a nice integration in build scripts.
> > > > > > >>> See below.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> With validate-abi.sh I do can do a "validate-abi.sh HEAD~1 HEAD".
> > > > > > >>>> And it will do the build, install, dump and comparison for me. 
> > > > > > >>>> And it picked up my 20.0.2 - > 21.0 changes no problem. 
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> With check-abi on the other hand, I need to the build and install myself.
> > > > > > >>>> check-abi requires dump files, but I see no reference in the documentation to how these are created.
> > > > > > >>>> It silently fails when it doesn't find any ...
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Do I run abi-dumper on the so's myself, or how does it work?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> check-abi.sh is integrated in test-build.sh and test-meson-builds.sh.
> > > > > > >>> Probably we should document usage in these scripts.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Looks like I need to set DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=master, not obvious.
> > > > > > >> Any tips or tricks would be welcome.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > export DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=v20.02
> > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > export DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=v19.11
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Depends on which compatibility you want to test...
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Few things ...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 1. test-meson-build.sh keep barfing complaining about reference paths.
> > > > > > ValueError: dst_dir must be absolute, got reference/v19.11/build-gcc-static/usr/local/share/dpdk/examples/bbdev_app
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Under the hood, ninja install is failing complaining that it needs an absolute path.
> > > > > > I fixed this in test_meson_build.sh and will send a patch in a minute. 
> > > > > > Though it's strange no-one else has seen it?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2. test-meson-build.sh compares the abi for the static builds, which doesn't make any sense. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 3. test-meson-build.sh will only take a branch in DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION that exists locally.
> > > > > > In order to get it to compare HEAD against HEAD~1, which you would imagine is a pretty common case.
> > > > > > I had a create a branch for HEAD~1, in validate-abi this a pretty simple `validate-abi HEAD~1 HEAD`
> > > > > > 
> > > > >  I think this code in test-meson-build.sh should probably be fixed:
> > > > > 
> > > > > if [ ! -d $abirefdir/src ]; then
> > > > >                                 git clone --local --no-hardlinks \
> > > > >                                         --single-branch \
> > > > >                                         -b $DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION \
> > > > >                                         $srcdir $abirefdir/src
> > > > >                         fi
> > > > > 
> > > > > Like you noted, using -b allows us to checkout a tag/branch in the cloned
> > > > > repository but requires that it exist locally.  We should probably prefix the
> > > > > checkout with a git fetch --tags
> > > > 
> > > > I don't understand your concern.
> > > > A reference is an older version, so it should be in the git tree.
> > > > 
> > > yes, but not unless you've done a recent pull or fetch.  If you set
> > > DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION to a tag/branch that didn't exist as of the last time you
> > > updated the tree, it won't be there (which it sounds like what is being
> > > encountered here).  You can fix that by doing a git pull or git fetch prior to
> > > running this script (or internal to the script)
> > 
> > Sorry I still don't understand the case.
> > We want to compare the current version C with a reference R which is older.
> > If the reference R is not in the tree, it means the version C is not in the tree.
> > But C is the current version, so it is in the tree by definition.
> > 
> 
> 
>                                       +---+
>                                       |   |
> +---+                                 |   | DPDK 20.11
> |   |Feature Branch commit            +-+-+
> |   |                                   |
> +-+-+   +---+                         +-v-+
>   |     |   | master HEAD             |   | master HEAD
>   |     +-+-+                         +-+-+
>   |       |                             |
>   |       |                             |
>   |     +-v-+                         +-v-+
>   +---->+   | DPDK 19.11              |   | DPDK 19.11
>         +---+                         +---+
> X                   X         X                   X
> XXXXXXX     XXXXXXXXX         XXXXXXX     XXXXXXXXX
>       XXX  XX                       XXX  XX
>         XXXX                          XXXX
> 
>      Local GIT copy                 DPDK.ORG
> 
> 
> 
> If a user clones from dpdk.org when dpdk 19.11 is tagged in the tree, or any
> time before dpdk 20.11 is tagged, then creates a feature branch, they may want
> to compare their abi to the latest stable version.  If they check dpdk.org and
> see that dpdk 20.11 is the latest tag in the tree, they can run check-abi.sh
> with the reference tag specified as 20.11, which exists in the dpdk.org tree,
> but may not have been pulled into their local copy yet.
> 
> I'm not saying this is definately what happened, but it would explain the
> reported observations.

OK now I understand.
The user specified a reference which is not in his local tree.
I vote for considering this case as an user mistake,
and document it as a limitation of the tool integration in our build
testing scripts.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-16 14:54 Neil Horman
2020-04-17 10:11 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-17 10:20   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-17 10:35     ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-17 11:46       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-17 11:47     ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-17 12:10       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-17 15:42         ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-17 16:10           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-20  8:43             ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-21 11:12           ` Neil Horman
2020-04-21 11:46             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-21 18:56               ` Neil Horman
2020-04-21 21:42                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-22 11:43                   ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-22 12:07                     ` Neil Horman
2020-04-22 12:18                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-22 13:19                         ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-22 13:30                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-23 11:03                         ` Neil Horman
2020-04-22 12:01                   ` Neil Horman
2020-04-22 12:16                     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-04-23 10:57                       ` Neil Horman
2020-05-24 20:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] devtools: remove old ABI validation script Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1755319.1xdlsreqCQ@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).