From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F5AA0547; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:29:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00860100C; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:29:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CD7374 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:29:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456CC578; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:29:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=EAVjaJccpB098+6Ej/czqsjY74ofhtb2giRa9wawPDI=; b=OdQoLSHHxG2v HVuAQ4kBPwf4Dau6MX5V9fOFk9X9R8pyGFY5gFWjbbmOOyGI8v0nDUvK+pvVQnXC HJmQzzH1NygE8Xkfap2rSdo9mry+ZPwDE76VvJlXd6KbgVCYsLQ2ExAkh5HEFgKV oygZbaj9jD3RZSR8sBrhCPvMRW8SSPM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=EAVjaJccpB098+6Ej/czqsjY74ofhtb2giRa9wawP DI=; b=QBWQ3zvz9uqC8PTErbtbfQMWydvHMfOo9NEsdSpRre1yNr0Piecg8WbxC otCfL74GJZf3lS7Uqf7gasz/fmka9R7hyxntZwklhKCXOavR2oWTEj6tVQ4z4z/a Hp51r2IRCbTE7iYvxZXkO8X3MAJQsMzuY94vrg+JYKmiNDasBVHhMFmZalN88gcE 4/dLyUVFC4uU/vI2iaPuEpXgwXlULg1esOafoPEoOKVQpNMdP/iWoWaX4vmTNL0d cxzs1AC+2lVf/4uETTfpShQA11T3O02hse0brmvk0TGE3/TJxXkUFKedi7ZjLL2w XTy4Vdr3dxaQIqLAHTMRUD5NBlXIw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrjedtgdejkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrsh esmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BB9103060BE4; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:29:47 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Yasufumi Ogawa , David Marchand Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , dev Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:29:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1776149.MyG8hOvIyE@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20191113214346.33749-1-yasufum.o@gmail.com> <6ea0b73a-1d38-dbe1-2142-9ab4fec594e7@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 14/02/2020 16:08, David Marchand: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 8:46 AM Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Could I confirm that this patch is going to be merged in 20.02? > > Sorry, but I can't take this patch in 20.02. > It breaks compilation on FreeBSD. > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2019-November/109435.html > > > I am still unconvinced on the need to change the size to something so > huge to accommodate with this new use case (secondary processes in > containers). > Why can't we truncate the container hostname so that it fits in 64 bytes? > > > Thomas, opinion? If the use case is justified enough, I would prefer merging such change in 20.11 avoiding an ABI breakage in a core library, even if it is experimental.