From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-f174.google.com (mail-qt1-f174.google.com [209.85.160.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359B94C9F; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 20:32:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f174.google.com with SMTP id c56-v6so22628994qtd.11; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:32:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5ohcFxz0UKMRe0XCOpvCKsFeL854CAxC6gTwGy5BQNE=; b=bHqRhuiiBA6lBlagOeJmReQ1lvBhDrPxPgSmJUpFYH5c3O7YGEXPydDb1NF9tnCL1W T2lrhRUoz7CQXzG+IY7zPP8hRnzLImB2wy5ACvAsyZJD9wH4g25NLHskgxPWbJy0WPpy nCXiisSMHszpv56RfJaMQPRk+7liV3MJQry3Zvhni8tNeEqhREBFU9MFkUdi5xC0j4p0 f+Syora03NuACLJsTkRV+t+yXwBD4ReV5pfNAFY0gSW4Z+OWSIpcwcPQEVwbI4BbQVkZ wdeSzkZ5KR8dct3PmBY2UZ5izGbyjBB+DxQOJTshqUfAsjebDYg9FjxmtMU4+ogGIXTa A2eQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5ohcFxz0UKMRe0XCOpvCKsFeL854CAxC6gTwGy5BQNE=; b=YMBHhIlQKKZaNwwEhvlTHpKonoL1gi4a3iSOq0aJLhmacwu0/VVgdFLmvowEH/jWx/ /37PRL5uuTK3f8Ek8XdNUtWIyOixX/mhKEl/L4yuXsml2ZKRNK6OCCiFIButsynE82hi 4r1HEk38FE+7+EKSW47PcUFLOL9gqSJ0zNl9b2P5d5O1GaJD4UvOPE/yZgziluPfXsZG SRr/tPQKHUxRy1YftO8G2zBueSm8mk1wD5wZKHHy9S4aPOTq+h9nz6YjSvTyjck+tVQC czcY6X4GmBvz0ooEwUwu+WL+TND0ZCOFDazVQvDH528BvuAxpI5VQVGl4l7Bys6UVLr7 mL8w== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfog9iy0wChpAVaByM1MOt8TBkAkz7inPlGMqFzLgSE2LtiPg+o8j U41xJrUBVAiH9lQomlN4YbkzrYo8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62CmWmOiX2O1IconlH3RjcUSIVSMkiTVZCDYQT2JYR5XplSkta3CXChuajxsR35bh6tZ34Cew== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9e6e:: with SMTP id z46mr12042253qve.180.1539628367418; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:8e22:d657:1886:ac81:a56f:69df? ([2600:380:8e22:d657:1886:ac81:a56f:69df]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v46-v6sm13475369qta.65.2018.10.15.11.32.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Ruinan X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16A366) In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:32:45 -0400 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "users@dpdk.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <17849E86-931B-494B-90D7-74E2016C0D3C@gmail.com> References: To: "Dey, Souvik" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:32:48 -0000 Hi, Did you enable trust mode on vf? If trust is off on host, promiscuous can=E2= =80=99t enabled from vm. Ruinan Hu ruinan.hu@casa-systems.com (857) 209-1955 > On Oct 15, 2018, at 14:26, Dey, Souvik wrote: >=20 > Hi All, > I am currently facing issues with getting the multicast IPv= 6 packets when using the i40evf pmd. >=20 > I do see there is a limitation mentioned in the release notes of DPDK that= >=20 > 16.27. I40e VF may not receive packets in the promiscuous mode > Description: > Promiscuous mode is not supported by the DPDK i40e VF driver when using th= e i40e Linux kernel driver as host driver. > Implication: > The i40e VF does not receive packets when the destination MAC address is u= nknown. > Resolution/Workaround: > Use a explicit destination MAC address that matches the VF. > Affected Environment/Platform: > All. > Driver/Module: > Poll Mode Driver (PMD). >=20 >=20 > Do this mean that multicast promiscuous mode is also not supported ? I am c= urrently facing issues with receiving packets multicast packets for IPv6 whi= ch is making IPv6 to fail with i40evf pmd. > I am currently using 17.11.2 DPDK with the Centos 7.5 and i40e 2.4.6 versi= on on the host. I have the rte_eth_allmulticast_enable() also set for the po= rt but still I see all multicast packets are not reaching the pmd. > Also if promiscuous mode has to be turned off then how should we add multi= cast address to the PF from the VF ? > -- > Regards, > Souvik