From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5B72A5F for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f65so93849134wmi.0 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:34:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RP423t3obZ8J1eBwTFhvYyHJlqC/Hk7XGiOC7tXxGRQ=; b=czaEyHlhjodt6X02vYZA5e8mflPS4keK1vnNOCfqb2f/wOS8hVzN/hLAxfONh7/QAH zt8P9bNaMfXIXQgIN1GfILIE2HmU3TjE0d4IHx8INcBeT6opi+co1mvFExpHpBTit7JR lV6vw09/g3Sx00mdF1DkiHZsIagapzPpvLpZ6HaxIVq1amSu+f7CUrqb0ZpAFtDbyWmo fSdeIlwfguWFA4eKXNYz6ZG9DmGxnGm7NjzODxoFQFJvp9V2ipzCr9nV4CKX9OKY0RlX r7W7BUweSWfsyPy7fTQyCu7W6mju3hNy/AWKfmPK0cK09D0ifP/u798irbD4AdJumc2S 590w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RP423t3obZ8J1eBwTFhvYyHJlqC/Hk7XGiOC7tXxGRQ=; b=c3TE2FoLWSv6BwvWDvsujhhwB6uEkesnOfsuSe+t+ozQVqmn3Yi36j+oHNJbBdyW1N EuzRZqisHkJu62Gn41v7RhUQrWZByQjO2MYNpHvfXfBdVoex6tOmN8zYHhxgycgELWVT mPbK7iSDBm95y8T+hrcwHThiYF53Luk9dx5H4Nzb2vZanM4FzLQppZF6V3eF58jpiUOS NggAUObjSLE2CqdVISgniBtebT0IVnv/Aj5PVgAfYx1sqPBwF5cN7iw/e99pDzle6VYi hQAwJHqy8r+sVTKxm7FIVpvD/PdfmbvhUXo+WCSg9FbfQ+mVmCdipMqUHbtdEDzebGt1 U5wg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKKFNXy0LMAx3Om7CeNaOi4DZVnESGzV41GKcugirNTi48cilPLsFQv0DVJxfVUVnzg X-Received: by 10.28.186.138 with SMTP id k132mr11798444wmf.65.1468316048804; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m5sm27537163wmm.10.2016.07.12.02.34.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:34:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: huawei.xie@intel.com, Jan Blunck , huilongx.xu@intel.com, Thiago Martins Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1795705.pPV7SVCssA@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK on Xen maintenance X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:34:09 -0000 Hi all, We are facing some issues with Xen dom0. Some were fixed in RC2: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/043760.html and there still have some other issues. It seems Xen is becoming less attractive: - we do not have a lot of test reports or feedbacks - there is no maintainer for DPDK on Xen - we are still waiting for the Xen netfront PMD I wonder wether it still makes sense to maintain this code or not? In case of positive reply, it would be nice to have the name of someone responsible for this code, i.e. a maintainer. Thanks