From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>,
Remy Horton <remy.horton@intel.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio: remove handling of zero desc number on RxQ setup
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:26:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17b58919-03a7-db3b-0c2d-612b3f365768@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <997133b4-176e-44f2-1340-b66a3a72e182@oktetlabs.ru>
On 9/14/21 8:40 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 9/13/21 10:25 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/20/21 2:47 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>>> From: Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>>>
>>> Rx queue setup callback allows to use the whole ring when
>>> descriptor number argument equals zero. There's no point to
>>> handle zero in any way since RTE Rx queue setup function
>>> rte_eth_rx_queue_setup() doesn't pass zero using fallback
>>> values.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 3be82f5cc5e3 ("ethdev: support PMD-tuned Tx/Rx parameters")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>>> index 8a48fba5cc..18f03c9fc9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>>> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ virtio_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>> }
>>> vq->vq_free_thresh = rx_free_thresh;
>>>
>>> - if (nb_desc == 0 || nb_desc > vq->vq_nentries)
>>> + if (nb_desc > vq->vq_nentries)
>>> nb_desc = vq->vq_nentries;
>>> vq->vq_free_cnt = RTE_MIN(vq->vq_free_cnt, nb_desc);
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Is that really a fix?
>> I see it more like an optimization in a cold path, so maybe it is not
>> worth backporting?
>
> The main idea is not an optimization, but simplification of
> the code to make it easier to understand. Less special
> cases is better.
>
> I agree that it does not make sense to backport it.
Ok, thanks. I'll will remove the Fixes tag while applying, no need to
resubmit.
Maxime
>
>> Other than that:
>> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-14 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-20 12:47 Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-13 19:25 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-09-14 6:40 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-14 7:26 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2021-09-14 7:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-14 11:24 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17b58919-03a7-db3b-0c2d-612b3f365768@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=remy.horton@intel.com \
--cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).