From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD782946 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id z87so139782754wmh.0 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:42:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SNstKur+WjA27DGHDLjvxMbySggKIU+pj/pvWt1PSiY=; b=spGDmiuVdQlQ771jYGa0qWeQrKGWtNd1DNkB2vvpYhQgHPage9qVWQlBMCGLIIVwO6 bwhbKK3mEncLkVUMlqweMFnsRMcY1CKNzjMZ2EwUnXbdbrBQ9pYJJ+JI6iXstyX1u4QJ X3yBLy5qo1L1TYQJmBDvC83mLmLu9oC1o9oC28ur1ZDVrLcO/j2j6uo/OMWHbFLPCN6/ OvW7XUtSdK13QXKIIHt4tT/M4HL9YBEF6TPfd41p0f1EIUoavmO/i1+OrsZrf36kbyxm JEznDHr5j6hAJlfka2Er3WvdaAUZb2O2j2PocklnS2gp9WE2ZsLTYPI4AOlqFxOnyDd2 s7YA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SNstKur+WjA27DGHDLjvxMbySggKIU+pj/pvWt1PSiY=; b=Uc+zanAEm0DrP4411WttmsVuI7WsG5AuYcYY80By0lBrJpAhgFnJcYdPxVL2TDj6Hn cNg4qFRqshaLBYDo3GosptG4I0qp0XXso6g3vRs+vp2r4ME0KDzQB6MrSQGGJaYrNonq MR8N5T9HvzDO7mMAqvjWxCxnnAZ7z7iFNGXgzFezPlWz5ZUmHvTGx6MvRYtmfh1oK7dz u8HdXdsj4nthwwzSR16XAaKQMgtEJeuKCvGn8zNCugKH+nJy/fMis58E3ZBM6S8ShZk/ K2IqUmNaCplXwOqZrI+l9CL40TcFwvd35odKERhCHLa3t30hGbXb/yYsjd5wNq6whsYI 9oug== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tILlnj2qKxiqsCl+d/kNevAWwtbEZCq4djL9J9h4BpND6hogSxVtJCyM5jvDv7Csid+ X-Received: by 10.28.165.66 with SMTP id o63mr10164233wme.102.1464360124535; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm8906570wme.19.2016.05.27.07.42.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 May 2016 07:42:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" Cc: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:42:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1802112.k4C4WrGtVZ@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2017180.gcuZq2Skul@xps13> <17438858.1XjK0Grm1a@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] fast red autotest X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:42:04 -0000 2016-05-27 14:04, Kantecki, Tomasz: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Is it possible to split them in > > - short functional tests > > - long run / perf tests > > ? > > So we could keep some basic tests in fast_test. > > I expect that tests which are not part of fast_test won't be run often or in > > enough various environments. > > It sounds like a good idea Thomas. I ran the test couple of times and it seems that functional test #4 takes most of the time and could be removed to long run scenario. Other functional tests run rather promptly. > Next week, I can prepare patch to implement long and short run commands for this test suite. Would it be OK? Yes. The goal is to have "make fast_test" really fast. Thanks