From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E26A00E6 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11E41BDEE; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:21:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF001BDED for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:21:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502EB21C4D; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:21:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 05 Aug 2019 10:21:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=2TCb4xnPhjqho96RMJUHKulV9geQisuEOPBHLbOMidQ=; b=gjv3piVaoibU Qh1wZtLl8fQHKO9H8xHMd33l+AeJefReGMkYRN94GzM+wIQlapq1bElDSLmE+HHy L/HmbgkRtv74jhHTnQ8+/PWlnJOpT8xYCK9qgAEV2geEHmvmeDhmcjSz4R9Dgsyu nzuBKRPlMeNxcd2bgzRvU/vutJ/HkUU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=2TCb4xnPhjqho96RMJUHKulV9geQisuEOPBHLbOMi dQ=; b=N1O8BzABAqqRoJytgHKS60qeVopHowVujwj/HEpBrwIWcWEhKbbZBqkJO be0S5nA7gjBXHY/ZkYcf9baptY8goZnhNx4Uml20m7O5AzZfzQQL7C7vstX9za9Z meyj75MGeSsUWCvA5TTKH7ZLfR+g44dQtJrYz1DJHvvUsbYp3YpvyWFZZ8pclj97 z/WKzMUOGct80TnqNOLokJo45X4K1YgPgmInG0S+hkhOX10cM5G8YtLcuRtQoI7E 9A6AunOku00rlUM292zwQ3YJDtiMeOGkVA7xQar7pFtkOq2/n3wGUgRaKlpzlC7B Mdlup3Mr6Nh7Rix4TugR1DTbfKn5A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddruddtjedgjeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D4FF78005A; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:21:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Aaron Conole Cc: Michael Santana Francisco , David Marchand , dev , Bruce Richardson , Ferruh Yigit , Luca Boccassi Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 16:21:03 +0200 Message-ID: <1803730.FWrF8JSLS9@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20190731145030.19956-1-aconole@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Enable fast-unit tests under travis X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 05/08/2019 16:18, Aaron Conole: > One thing I notice is that some of the tests are still failing > 'sporadically' and that's difficult to discern. So we might just use > the robot as 'warn' rather than 'error' for now and maintainers will > have to make a best determination. Yes it can be a good first step.