From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11279A0547; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:58:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89991608BB; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:58:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DC11608AD for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:58:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C8C5C010E; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:57:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:57:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= hqO35z6SA886Tzn+R3SJBynu4kYJ2VLKzEjUDbGIlBk=; b=Dw14ufEbwsgb/mzW G4ZlFi7iXGNC+MQrbljZKtfEKrQdp6TTPjMOdHBJCflmIz53iJJ/50sxlnLHjvxz +GRJw5Q1IQssyO7S62OW0BZ8nefmseBr4bvenjjsqko/XaZKGu60j6DN5+rkoeBE kF1gsF9HtCiA+4eCfQy9D3ZTD5gxsRg9w54ydA8ZDrK3Lx9h+AwCrRb8HMENKioi ntpPpzSgGdmI+Ratb2t46VRiAaqvnHUlEqauPWrVTfrQAjB4+U9c19u+C+dgHsY5 aTVtU9lrYJeiLM2te6jU8e0G6N+7rk6TDKCKKLeTZHqlUhQrhNHAHyKQjCgQlAUD b+JbVQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=hqO35z6SA886Tzn+R3SJBynu4kYJ2VLKzEjUDbGIl Bk=; b=eYwTNJRgo1Z0J1A+XekMmvVyfBoPjD8+LorOOMRYQGobBL+F/VN79VY9a peQS2LK7n4dQeilAKOUMQ0glv5/vlsqt5GlO6pX04+T//n6btQKPmWYTR3FtmHOQ Jc4m8KNGCxBvYNG0u9EDroJCyNXmryzcCh2W1WRa4FGonLKXzGx/8RXi5J58Fyy4 OcNYH4LMTT8PXYMLSaHLWbPXK18GlLBlckxwDrb/npLmtRbfkaXbuilYHUVDQ5zy dWy3E3Q5o3GTuh+klNEk+c3Ivr2gKHk1rjRXjVeVVaJ++KvVGEpxl1hbQBi1d6tJ hzDw5Vi0tKW+X21iJPj9vWlB+vsCQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddvvddgkedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E8D131080057; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:57:57 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Andrew Rybchenko , dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger , Hemant Agrawal Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:57:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1814295.Ebq3lEQrT6@thomas> In-Reply-To: <43888872-56db-974c-056d-a337ed22e48d@intel.com> References: <20210311100040.3267225-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> <43888872-56db-974c-056d-a337ed22e48d@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] common/sfc_efx: update copyright year X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 12/03/2021 15:57, Ferruh Yigit: > On 3/11/2021 10:00 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > Bump copyright year to 2021. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko > > Series applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks. > > > Not really it is a trouble for me but do we really need these year updates, > what happens if we update the year only when we touch that file? We don't think about updating the year each time we touch a file, and it would be annoying. > cc'ed a few more people may know more about copyright year. I am not sure the copyright can end at a date if not mentioned. And I don't think it has already been an issue for any Open Source SW. I think the most important is to mark the first year. Personnaly I consider the starting date is enough, so I never extend the copyright after the original year. Note: I avoid the usual "IANAL but". Oops just did it ;)