From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C175586
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:51:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l124so31978427wmf.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dUwqb4L8uTbd+B4krqPgwCBqXIIYgdVqizH26yGKQHQ=;
 b=HZ2p9gDHRDcLd1SUNuij6qihexYGazJCBwqtyvH/nwXstQtu8HzdQ8HFdzbp7Hqf0D
 2l1H7O6Rruksfxge90m5BSdMfmSoyATME/CH+jjxDC3Hg0M+czuavaA6KbH815uj/CXn
 e9ZTlw4Sc2CbOpmMmyBF9/CvrVXsOLUbhoG2mZ+YUAzYzmsn1yNC/vt2HNetv6dcopqN
 golNptAz80tNKYV4z6X/yWZPmyfPg7shV2WWvpkRn4W24NXTFbMT3zuZ30CyPHVC60aT
 XC1OcwZq3OiXrljLR5r9RKujeuk7ex67nwEFKXN4kgW/qiICvG6nvZkRPX/nEoZdkJXl
 7xsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dUwqb4L8uTbd+B4krqPgwCBqXIIYgdVqizH26yGKQHQ=;
 b=EK0KdikVALcXneTshExOKUHc/Oab4voOOENjh13AKe84f0DMv1fC7/IliG6S9gZLUn
 G0eqPtWY7GZpMVUWwhhoR6l7d4PzMxZRG0bz0IYtl2vYyuU5hyv6ILvOrvtQLU5qhjJl
 5/mdBAiQvYELOOGzoXKyVRujWA3vJ7u7dUWOOdTWZ/nSoRXHR/UO9q7/w84pP0cdnreR
 baNiXg+PQG419dwmjd1XWscnzZU219TdmOCf7uVBRuSDn7AFhIFRctYoONqoLKfnnBQT
 VQC+WrLgC0IzNENrRJsnPVb7KLYLfjdFS3y0UGLJ1pMFT8dRc9g3BwHQoHCerJRxHppa
 D42Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJt6dzxjyYmO+X5D+HK2YMY/B5gcw6uaEWSnaAn0YfK8InmmpDhTH8syjpGPI5tf3yR
X-Received: by 10.28.195.9 with SMTP id t9mr18197010wmf.0.1458309089083;
 Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (91.111.75.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.75.111.91])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c71sm12787797wmd.4.2016.03.18.06.51.28
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: viktorin@rehivetech.com
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 jianbo.liu@linaro.org
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:49:57 +0100
Message-ID: <18259292.OJteoyVp0E@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20160318130019.4715e5d5@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz>
References: <20160318130019.4715e5d5@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] arm: detect NEON by RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON
	flag only
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:51:29 -0000

2016-03-18 13:00, Jan Viktorin:
> The RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON was only a result of the gcc testing.
> However, the target CPU may not support NEON or the user can disable to
> use it (as it does not always improve the performance).
> 
> The RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON detection is now based on both, the
> __ARM_NEON_FP feature from gcc and CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_NEON from
> the .config. The memcpy implemention is driven by
> RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON, so the reason to disable neon is hidden for
> the actual code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
> ---
> 
> I can also include this one:
> 
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c:253:#elif defined(__ARM_NEON)

Yes please.
I will set my patch as superseded.