From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com (mail-wr0-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EF15911 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:52:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 89so25420288wrr.3 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:52:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XVZbMAv6SyytVZ20ycMMNYf4QLjDx/t4X6Slo3MZJb0=; b=ThPn4qajL900ZDPlLg90z8fKDoWHIKPxQOj96EUBWO+BnCjVT8T/izJYG4n8lvewGL AUwO2ifGLT4ubK/YsI8G69THFmV0U/EmGy1VbVsc1v21izDryFvNFP5ID7R/jeDGuWwt Od59nPFetMWimGgKJ2JfF6KBgQSFAmp5qvdSuP65c1dOxIhoG4sz2yATZKm3ig5xMsZ3 Wq4O/4LhP6LpuXPYXTp/4FQI8Vb/nw8QKBNmlUAkGVuy7ZCjKpHQuAB1Nx7MC5gWbU57 A8qp2S5chZWweixuGfskLinbjmybTC62/Nym/Of12JBPEANKpE5rcghHzMaDpAaAbRmY IRpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XVZbMAv6SyytVZ20ycMMNYf4QLjDx/t4X6Slo3MZJb0=; b=WPAnDPQNvXIVE7KE2YvSJBcRwc9hwDCjXZP56qQA8C84nbswuwMGimasmG2bFz/T4q SckudN/HXL8/ASlI1gQB5CN++qKEgjiaxN148/xBQPwXf+3BOVCMbpJswuYaXEQXd4D6 6vASnu9iKfOO9+LgiQDYCyKMv88e2dvCEwLWkzxkQNlOjqajuaOlFz7zT0zQBXyUPCQ2 nLNB5MqBf+Xs+s995ls1RD1vDdwyQRiPa9tWZqfvICVpi30b5YbN2eOu1HNDRvFH5y1f c21QTLveeJK2ZvUDQ//f+wNQFNq95Zy/7Je1zWcTcg4jLUZYzCmW9a4AJCacUNeabepc uuWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kLC4dX6US8bgiKazSAo0eWTzSh9/tzgDM0WHyVigo+EEIwSaRdP00UENgsjh6PzwK2 X-Received: by 10.223.128.231 with SMTP id 94mr28315668wrl.165.1487868746157; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:52:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (187.21.90.92.rev.sfr.net. [92.90.21.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b8sm4058256wrb.9.2017.02.23.08.52.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:52:25 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Cc: "Trahe, Fiona" , dev@dpdk.org, Pankaj Joshi , users@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:43:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1834186.BtXV0yjv0z@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <5068483.Xs10W06zQs@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] Problem running dpdk-qat example in SR-IOV mode X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:52:26 -0000 2017-02-23 16:18, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 2017-02-20 11:53, Trahe, Fiona: > > > The dpdk-qat example app is an earlier mechanism of wrapping a QAT > > driver into DPDK - it's not using the cryptodev API, and depends on both a > > kernel driver and user-space libs from a QAT package. > > > Unless you have a really good reason for using this (like you wanted to > > use the older Cave Creek device) I would recommend you use the cryptodev > > API. > > > > Could we remove this obsolete example? > > This is a good point. How can we proceed with this? As it is a sample application, > does it require a deprecation notice? I don't think so. You just have to send a patch. Thanks