From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176E2A0A02; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 21:18:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95484410E5; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 21:18:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721CA410E2 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 21:18:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA225C01E3; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:18:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 03 Jun 2021 15:18:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= u8xppJyiK7trwR6qh6RwsGdljn86ZjSOFQBIDkzHolA=; b=yI6nN1u1y+n0LSXQ ezmdt8APlFFGCJg/4Api57VIzp2UxG/mKN54MR2dxhxkkTBRTTi5hHmfVpdvAwlA VY7eGiPA2bigGA65TvPnoHTVMHnFgKhVYUYX6TpKAK911A+PX30KdJDUSxbr98f6 s8NwiguJs01XNcwJnW/Bh8dSMUZTKa/4YbxjebI9Te3d2QBYUz3VIANoB/kYKHod oj7ZjjRYL0bLybcU8vJZkB2TUH97orSVg4ouT+tJG0UPGaSEqz/V9oIDnHFDpVot IPp6tNzX3YWM49T85gae4kyhLs4eAxbooFjjoMgwZHB7/N0/831E2zKs55e599g2 rwnJuw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=u8xppJyiK7trwR6qh6RwsGdljn86ZjSOFQBIDkzHo lA=; b=d54+6iy94B0Kz8bDVzsulSggZtPlJdnGDbUs0lYWGOAO03pfnxOEDIfcE lECVeVHSwn9r/Fsz3py8Jz4CRnVZVZD/V7w4j4WV44vc9mpezz1PaVdQwRCZlbPd vrosO3tULIwTVZTm5aua8ZXBT5Y/3AxG3Wml5yTMvRsDcZCWEy3LTdP5jsWc8scg VagGJ+Uq/J1vdclacSZOwuMmbSr2MEiSknENeFm3bmxOR1K++KaOm1/geo/jjpNu dAAJ+7FX26IItzDyGz+3fsRdZmwfL9z3+cc6NNa5QjzyVkQPjTKVhVzvEE2R5eBj Qhhc4Hxp3R3Aso8FaMSQzPEwWNGEw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdelledgudeffecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtudenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefffegiedtfeetffeuueffleeuuddvleetkeelgfevudekvdeu ueegieekhfelgfenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:18:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ali Alnubani , Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 21:18:23 +0200 Message-ID: <1835865.ogO8Tvl0ac@thomas> In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61818@smartserver.smartshare.dk> References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61817@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <11041276.vyNeVKDHc6@thomas> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61818@smartserver.smartshare.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 03/06/2021 20:15, Morten Br=F8rup: > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11 > >=20 > > 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Br=F8rup: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org. > > > > > > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing. > > > > > > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this. > >=20 > > Ali is the admin of dpdk.org. > > I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases > > are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git. >=20 > Ali, it would be great if you can include them. > Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS > bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade > to the latest LTS bugfix release. Actually it's already included (thanks Ali for reminding it to me): https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v20.11/source There are 2 different repos and that's how it is exposed in this tool. It may be a bit confusing. Do you think it would be OK to rename dpdk-stable to dpdk in this tool?