From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245C1A034D; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:19:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02C840DF4; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:19:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DB840DDD; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:19:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76265C0221; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:19:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:19:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; bh=nAKbbMMaD8fktP WhVo/q09XRX5qHCWrBCn/4BvwTC3s=; b=cvEk+GeyP5AgtuX/wfgf2QLVHHJuPr F2bIAehjwvSh96xcFsJ/oQLgbSpUBDxqdbECa4J/YXuCQccIDJH+phv660oMRQP9 w0NSq19YYkh2eN4aGjQviAfQuSM0yX27OotnNNgegfmYmz9gLLaf+b9evX8JWoGI TdAdAG2YK9eeA9a5AbP336xBfrdX4lcEAcG0nNggoKevsdicCrYPp/KXJYGTRp23 3aNWMCX3OQoa+S0OsULAalQM/KMlnKc2/xxbjkg8w1yGT+WJE5pIqockbfOitDm1 M7uhKgQ+vdIiWCVTYT3pNaf4iWi+x76+dN+L7X+wAII2OGsaKq3OkfvQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=nAKbbMMaD8fktPWhVo/q09XRX5qHCWrBCn/4BvwTC 3s=; b=IoHmce1JwkU7cB+geMPPdJZnUHay4AuxnBOGJQQepryxlnUK1bU9JMWbN f68ifvHpryyqiY3J/GeV+NCHepMO9qlk5oOBC9UHKRe8hu6Sah2uA9kZSeTv0TwW y8+iu2+zOPOBwEm0vI0r7QsAIm+okWyDAm3MDrfI+u1a9Oec+IDQiwC3L4qc/MDT r7nk9tknJ2uAAyCuWZ+sQp9tHhF0aniMsU5Yo15gaEEGWaVuZf2ukgWSoks3ZQ+a TXQANOT5eBvHZ6K4TEQoPPrJh+HT2k3uR09KmXzqu3bvUAkO0jftdgUZ31XriguV yaHxIMHNZgWitEE24E3BqQgz6YC5A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddvkedgudefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:19:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Cc: "Zhang, Roy Fan" , "Nicolau, Radu" , "Buckley, Daniel M" , stable@dpdk.org, "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix GMAC parameters setting Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:19:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1854949.taCxCBeP46@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20220309104514.1180589-1-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org > > > AES-GMAC requires plaintext length to be 0 when using AES-GCM, so only > > > AAD data is used. > > > > > > Fixes: a501609ea646 ("crypto/ipsec_mb: fix length and offset > > > settings") > > > Cc: pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara > > Acked-by: Fan Zhang Thanks Pablo! > > Would it be possible to merge this fix for this release? > A previous commit merged in this release has introduced a bug, > so it would be great if this fix can make it into 22.03. Applied, thanks.