From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAACA0547; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:58:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3601D4111F; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:58:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CF6410E1 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:58:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B51E3201CF6; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:58:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:58:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= /A1CqWMpozT+kZpOE6nCWEH32dCFAYpZkNs6lIgm4Ic=; b=hYIdUCd3pkJMqC0R PVUdwd7ckKk/BjHGrod5ptjnEZNbeBFH30uTAwogTWJTdE1CScemBycumQVW5SMb srLP7oNe+7Z/wvN6jQZaAcVpi6n0+HyMAHJKjUn6Dkdwc57kM7K5POWs7L6mMK65 q0wEtDHdST16ZjmWE4/tEuklanzbbJCjNm195PzDl2X9UOJeo8VGLa2Pk0yp/wBS EOENnkJT9XvymqogEAWtEvwEMoXToTTy153qkykMMSoIaTj7JRGcKANx61m0feCu J3Y9bauh7LtsqroOXck18Rr5IMnAsFg4SS3w4oq5Whjs6hxTUM7PhB5TtdEF15HK pxbFFw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=/A1CqWMpozT+kZpOE6nCWEH32dCFAYpZkNs6lIgm4 Ic=; b=NhvUEgiojBNp6gsz+FumbAbedUpwoP75hporIIro6imBSSVX6fakl++rp 0Elr6zHAXir+GTJGN2XGN2YXcyPkfQasSHopBTujS1YZk0NyYmbYCAHzgJf3x3Fl OOlCa3v8ZSIe/QmASoS1peLwQnpOAuDUx+3Z+FJKWLYRepF1MB4VgBUI2r1Q2h6F 0SZbg+npt7SAUPtOUUr18wh8QkclyABQBmUSrnNRqg0evuujXP7F5SXwCqxYGq7y T7RNnEl3EouJsQZWRGDt44AmdsOGodEQVnz8OL4bvy/lJY8hzQCX8yB9xUJwgMIG sw7MNIzJOeiRKrprvQHUC7SW/1qEg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdeghedgieeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:57:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jasvinder.singh@intel.com, megha.ajmera@intel.com, "Liguzinski, WojciechX" , david.marchand@redhat.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:57:57 +0200 Message-ID: <1856407.E66k3sLkBB@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20211028101802.4127295-2-wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com> References: <20211025113208.3910951-1-wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com> <20211028101802.4127295-1-wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com> <20211028101802.4127295-2-wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v19 1/5] sched: add PIE based congestion management X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 28/10/2021 12:17, Liguzinski, WojciechX: > Implement PIE based congestion management based on rfc8033 An explanation is missing about why RED code is removed. I don't know whether it deserves a separate commit, but at least it should be removed consisently in lib and example code in the same patch. Cristian, please make efforts to help this patchset be properly organized. A blind ack is not enough.